Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Another guy gets cought with an AW and does no real jail time.
Collapse
X
-
/Chris
I have a perfect Burning Man attendance record: zero.
You do know there are more guns in the country than there are in the city.
Everyone and their mums is packin' round here!
Like who?
Farmers.
Who else?
Farmers' mums. -
-
Yeah, no kidding. It's not like LA jails and California prisons don't count much more legitimate "Hollywood Elite" among their block residents. Much more famous rappers or musicians have ended up there.WTB: French & Finnish firearms. WTS: raw honey, tumbled .45 ACP brass, stupid cat.Comment
-
/Chris
I have a perfect Burning Man attendance record: zero.
You do know there are more guns in the country than there are in the city.
Everyone and their mums is packin' round here!
Like who?
Farmers.
Who else?
Farmers' mums.Comment
-
And what if you can't walk out because spouse is blocking the door?
Or what if spouse comes after you and your defense of yourself involves blocking which leaves marks, and the cops charge you for being bigger and male?
Not all of life's choices are really choices.Mention the Deacons for Defense and Justice and make both left and right wingnuts squirmComment
-
Good plea for serving time
Crappy plea for Firearm rights.Hauoli Makahiki Hou



-------Comment
-
Bill, if you know them personally I will not argue with you about it. However, I worked in the background screening industry for several years (post 9-11) and most employers are screening employees nowdays, the liability to shareholders and customers is staggering otherwise. There may be a few tech-startup enterprises where they are desperate for talent, that may cut a few corners and may nod-wink at a pot bust on somebody's record. At the firm where I worked, the prospective employers did not even care to know the charge, just whether it was a felony or a misdemeanor and how old the conviction was. I don't know any employers using our screening services that would hire someone with a felony on their record. If you spend even as little as 5 years sitting on the sideline in any vaguely technical area (medicine, computers, even auto mechanics) you are basically starting from scratch when you finally do get back in the game.
I can tell you, if I have a choice between two individuals and one has a clean record and the other has a misdemeanor, I would not be hiring the guy with a record. In the current job market, having a record is going to keep a lot of people looking for work a looooooong time.The one thing worse than defeat is surrender.Comment
-
-
-
I would be devastated.Boy this post is an epic fail. He plead no contest to DV charges. He will never own firearms again. EVER! (unless we can win some court cases).
I guess that is no real jail time, but the idea that this isn't a big deal is probably something most of this forum will disagree with.
Losing my hobby, my job, my right to self-defense...
I can only think of a few worse punishments (serious prison time, debilitating injury, death).Comment
-
"Just leave me alone, I know what to do." - Kimi Raikkonen
The moment the idea is admitted into society, that property is not as sacred as the laws of God, and that there is not a force of law and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence.' and that `Property is surely a right of mankind as real as liberty.'
- John Adams
http://www.usdebtclock.org/Comment
-
I would argue that any time an "assault weapon" charge is levied against a citizen, it is a travesty; even hardened criminals. Let them be charged with the crimes they are committing, absent an AW charge. I would also argue that any time someone loses his gun rights forever over something stupid like a misdemeanor, it is a travesty, even when it's a hardened criminal.
Let severe crimes carry severe penalties, and minimum crimes carry little penalty. As soon as we begin to say it's OK for one group, it can be used against another.Originally posted by Alan GuraThe Second Amendment now applies to state and local governments. Our lawsuit is a reminder to state and local bureaucrats that we have a Bill of Rights in this country, not a Bill of NeedssigpicOriginally posted by hoffmang12050[CCW] licenses will be shall issue soon.
-GeneComment
-
As a contractor who has been in hundreds of businesses I can agree. Many companies will not even let someone on site with ANY form of DV, some are even more strict.Bill, if you know them personally I will not argue with you about it. However, I worked in the background screening industry for several years (post 9-11) and most employers are screening employees nowdays, the liability to shareholders and customers is staggering otherwise. There may be a few tech-startup enterprises where they are desperate for talent, that may cut a few corners and may nod-wink at a pot bust on somebody's record. At the firm where I worked, the prospective employers did not even care to know the charge, just whether it was a felony or a misdemeanor and how old the conviction was. I don't know any employers using our screening services that would hire someone with a felony on their record. If you spend even as little as 5 years sitting on the sideline in any vaguely technical area (medicine, computers, even auto mechanics) you are basically starting from scratch when you finally do get back in the game.
I can tell you, if I have a choice between two individuals and one has a clean record and the other has a misdemeanor, I would not be hiring the guy with a record. In the current job market, having a record is going to keep a lot of people looking for work a looooooong time.
Working for financial institutions, Goldman, Morgan, chase, the federal reserve etc, often requires that contractors (electricians, AC guys) pass the 1934 sec act background. We have had guys with expunged misdemeanors denied.
They WILL find the arrest for a misdemeanor, even one 15 years old as they did for one guy I know. He was 18 when t happened. It's expunged so they wanted the police report to make their decision. He never even saw the police report and the cops wouldn't give him a redacted copy, even with a public records request. He was denied access to the job. 12 years with the same company, never ANY contact with law enforcement before or after. Everyone at work now knows he has a record, the company is scared to send him to new high profile clients, and this will NEVER be fixed.
Another guy had a drunk and disorderly in college. He is an officer of the company and makes over 500k. He has had trouble getting badged to project manage his jobs. I know this man personally.
If your arrested now days, it will never go away, EVER!Last edited by anthonyca; 10-05-2011, 6:31 AM.https://www.facebook.com/pages/Union...70812799700206
Originally posted by WherryjI am a physician. I am held to being "the expert" in medicine. I can't fall back on feigned ignorance and the statement that the patient should have known better than I. When an officer "can't be expected to know the entire penal code", but a citizen is held to "ignorance is no excuse", this is equivalent to ME being able to sue my patient for my own malpractice-after all, the patient should have known better, right?Comment
-
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,858,295
Posts: 25,042,744
Members: 354,731
Active Members: 5,947
Welcome to our newest member, Juan1302.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 3311 users online. 43 members and 3268 guests.
Most users ever online was 65,177 at 8:20 PM on 09-21-2024.

Comment