Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gov Brown's Newsroom - Check for Vetoes
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
i am guessing the DROS as a tax=good because you can't raise the price on DROS fees. it has to be just enough to pay for what it was intended to do, which is to cover the cost of what a DROS does.
because now they can't say, "you have UOC, you don't need LTC." we no longer have UOC, thus we HAVE to have LTC since no other option is legally viable.PSN name= entwie_dumaylaOriginally posted by 2761377man's greatest accomplishments have been achieved in the face of futility.
it's a piss poor excuse to quit.
"I came into this world with someone else's blood on me and I don't mind leaving the same way..."
***looking to buy in great condition yugo sks***Comment
-
So CCW is good because it keeps the 58 Sherrifs from holding LTCs hostage with fees and now they have to play only with good cause right?sigpicComment
-
I do like lemonade. I'm still pissed off.Sean
sigpicComment
-
The DROS bill will necessarily and immediately be challenged in the NRA's Harris v. Bauer case. If anyone doesn't understand the DROS issue or SB 819, I recommend reading the NRA's alert in that case on www.calgunlaws.com or reading the complaint in that case.
Everyone knows how AB 144 will be used agaist the other side in the current LTC cases (SAF/CGF & NRA/CRPAF).
SB 427 was vetoed as a result of the NRA's Parker v. CA case from last year that overturned AB 962 and is currently being appealed.
Obviously it certainly would have been nice if AB 809 wasn't signed. But at the end of the day, two of the three bills that were signed aren't the end of the world. They become part of litigation that was already set in motion. So while those cases are litigated, enjoy purchasing all of your ammo over the internet and in stores without leaving a thumbprint. Lets see how litigation plays out regarding long gun registration.
The pro 2A bill on his desk was signed.
And if any of you need another reason to look on the bright side, consider this: De Leon introduced 3 anti-gun bills this session (SB 124, SB 427, and SB 798). As of midnight tonight, ZERO of those bills became law.
Last edited by CMonfort; 10-10-2011, 2:04 AM.Comment
-
Ah, I get it now. Well, this might work out in the end, after all. Sure would be nice if they would do away with the moral character/ good cause part of CCWs, though.There was an argument in the case Michel and Associates filed that the DROS fees were fees and not taxes. Now that the DROS fees are used for other stuff, it's clear they are taxes and thus unconstitutional.
In both carry cases, the judges ruled that since you could UOC in urban California you had an alternate means of self defense in public. Now you don't. Heh.
Absolutely nothing. Only new long guns that are DROSed will have their serial numbers retained in AFS. If you bend your own flat, no DROS. If you buy a bent receiver, the DROS will retain the serial number just like your handguns.
-GeneThis may sound strange and unbelievable to you, but it is real and true.
- excerpt from Nigerian scam emailComment
-
"When you get the (men) to the range, you just get the men. But when you bring the (women) to the range, you get the (whole family). And that's what's going to save our 2nd Amendment."--Dianna Liedorff
"Since self-preservation is the 1st law of nature, we assert the...right to self-defense. The Constitution...clearly affirms the right of every American...to bear arms. And as Americans, we will not give up a single right guaranteed under the Constitution." --Malcolm XComment
-
And what good cause will require them to issue LTC's? I see them saying they will now issue but since no one has a good cause then they will still be able to deny them.Gun control is a 1" group at 500 yds!Comment
-
Did I ever tell you how much I love you guys! http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/i...ilies/kilt.gif
Too bad most ends up needing litigated. Anything you guys need please tell me. Need to speak to you off list one day.Comment
-
The first part, Bauer v. Harris
Second, the Peruta and Richards judges essentially ruled that un-functional firearms carry is A-OK under the 2nd amendment "Bear" provision. We know this to be obviously wrong, and in fact, it is widely believed that even if UOC were banned, the District Courts would have ruled against us anyway the first round (see the numerous other cases in concealed carry only states such as NY).
The Circuit Courts is a different question all together. If they screw up at that level, we can take it to SCOTUS.Comment
-
AB 809 is the only bummer in the pile really. Certainly I'd overall prefer that UOC not be banned. However, it will get us all to loaded carry faster and then the whole "substantially concealed" issue will rear it's hilarious head.
This year certainly beats "Republican" Governor Ahnold and his Microstamping and Lead Ammo bans...
-GeneGene Hoffman
Chairman, California Gun Rights Foundation
DONATE NOW to support the rights of California gun owners. Follow @cgfgunrights on Twitter.
Opinions posted in this account are my own and not the approved position of any organization.
I read PMs. But, if you need a response, include an email address or email me directly!
"The problem with being a gun rights supporter is that the left hates guns and the right hates rights." -Anon
Comment
-
While I'm just speculating... ever consider that Gov. Brown is playing chess too? I figure that by signing the Long Gun registration, he just made it VERY easy to create a circuit split... You see he knows politics. This way he can appease his base while still driving a pro-gun agenda. Turning the DROS Fee into a tax should have it's own consequences that probably aren't good for the DROS tax. From what I recall of the UOC bill, UOC is still legal in this state... it's just now only legal to UOC in the same places that you can LOC without a permit/license to do so.
If he's as pro-gun as I suspect he really is, he might actually be looking for ways to make it so California can't do stuff like this ever again... Remember, chess...Comment
-
Last edited by NorCalDustin; 10-10-2011, 2:06 AM.Originally posted by BannedinBritainThe only dumb question is the one you don't ask...and get arrested for later.Comment
-
Mark my words that I hesitated to point out Heller II to him...While I'm just speculating... ever consider that Gov. Brown is playing chess too? I figure that by signing the Long Gun registration, he just made it VERY easy to create a circuit split... You see he knows politics. This way he can appease his base while still driving a pro-gun agenda. Turning the DROS Fee into a tax should have it's own consequences that probably aren't good for the DROS tax. From what I recall of the UOC bill, UOC is still legal in this state... it's just now only legal to UOC in the same places that you can LOC without a permit/license to do so.
If he's as pro-gun as I suspect he really is, he might actually be looking for ways to make it so California can't do stuff like this ever again... Remember, chess...
-GeneGene Hoffman
Chairman, California Gun Rights Foundation
DONATE NOW to support the rights of California gun owners. Follow @cgfgunrights on Twitter.
Opinions posted in this account are my own and not the approved position of any organization.
I read PMs. But, if you need a response, include an email address or email me directly!
"The problem with being a gun rights supporter is that the left hates guns and the right hates rights." -Anon
Comment
-
I certainly hope that your "plan comes together" in far less than two weeks.sigpicComment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,857,754
Posts: 25,035,957
Members: 354,530
Active Members: 6,278
Welcome to our newest member, Boocatini.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 39629 users online. 21 members and 39608 guests.
Most users ever online was 65,177 at 8:20 PM on 09-21-2024.





Comment