Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

DFG can prohibit rifles and handguns

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #61
    Flying Sig
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 1338

    sigpic
    NRA Patron Member

    Comment

    • #62
      YubaRiver
      Senior Member
      • May 2009
      • 991

      WA state allows LTC when archery

      If you have a LTC in WA state, you can carry for self defense while
      archery only hunting. WA is a shall issue state as well. This is good in some
      of the areas that have grizzly bears and such. You may not use
      the firearm to dispatch or otherwise take game tho.

      Anyway, I find I am a better shot with a bow than a handgun at archery
      ranges.

      I mentioned this to a CA warden friend who archery hunts and tho he believed
      it was illegal to carry a handgun when on shotgun or archery only hunts that he saw little reason for such a rule since the other weapons did just fine.

      I suppose someone could bring a scoped .308 Contender on their hip.

      Comment

      • #63
        huntercf
        Veteran Member
        • Aug 2011
        • 3114

        Originally posted by thenodnarb
        They also prevent bowhunters from carrying while bowhunting in bow season. It makes me really nervous hunting bears with only a bow, without a 44 mag backup. But the law is there to prevent poaching with a gun in bow season. I understand it, but I don't necessarily agree with it.

        If you aren't hunting, I don't think DFG laws apply to you.
        In other states they allow you to carry a pistol for protection because in other states they actually care about the welfare of their residents, CA does not. Also, in those other states when you take an animal with a bow they have a kit that checks for the presence of lead just to make sure, but in this state that would make too much sense, hence it won't be done.
        Gun control is a 1" group at 500 yds!

        Comment

        • #64
          Spelunker
          Member
          • Jul 2007
          • 458

          Originally posted by hoffmang
          You should see progress on this by the end of the year.

          -Gene
          Were getting close to the end of the year and I got a bow for Christmas, soooo is there any progress?

          Comment

          • #65
            Kid Stanislaus
            Veteran Member
            • Dec 2008
            • 4419

            Originally posted by donw
            it is also unlawful to possess a firearm during ARCHERY only season for deer. its intended to prevent the taking of a deer with a firearm then using an archery tag.
            I'm think'n its no be chore for an experienced eye to see the difference between an arrow wound and a bullet wound. Since hunters are required to check in with DF&G at the earliest opportunity I'm calling BULL PUCKY on their policy.
            Things usually turn out best for those who make the best of how things turn out.

            Comment

            • #66
              gun toting monkeyboy
              Calguns Addict
              • Aug 2008
              • 6820

              Originally posted by Kid Stanislaus
              I'm think'n its no be chore for an experienced eye to see the difference between an arrow wound and a bullet wound. Since hunters are required to check in with DF&G at the earliest opportunity I'm calling BULL PUCKY on their policy.
              Here is a partial list of the people who can sign off your deer tag in California:
              1. (No idea, this one was ommited from the list I found)
              2. Forest Supervisors (FS)
              3. Assistant Forest Supervisors (FS)
              4. District Forest Rangers (FS)
              5. Foresters (FS, BLM)
              6. Range Conservationists (FS, BLM)
              7. Forest Engineers (FS, BLM)
              8. Forestry Aides (FS)
              9. Fire Control Officers or Aides (FS, BLM)
              10. Clerks (FS, FWS, BLM) while on duty at their headquarters
              11. Game Management Agents (FWS)
              12. Wildlife Management Biologists (FS, FWS, BLM)
              13. District Managers (BLM)
              14. Information Specialists (BLM)
              15. Area Managers (BLM)
              16. Realty Specialists (BLM)
              17. Natural Resource Specialists (BLM)
              18. Engineers (BLM)
              19. Engineering Technicians (BLM)
              20. Recreation Resource Specialists (BLM)
              21. Geologists (BLM)
              22. Recreation Aides (BLM)
              23. All Uniformed Personnel of the National Park Service
              24. Commanding officers of any United States military installation or their designated personnel for deer taken on their reservation.
              25. Postmasters
              26. Post Office Station or Branch Manager for deer brought to their post office.

              My guess would be a fair number of these people would have no idea how to tell wounds apart. Showing up at a Post Office and dragging some poor woman out to look at a splattered deer carcass probably won't get you exactly what you could consider to be a thorough examination...

              -Mb
              Originally posted by aplinker
              It's OK not to post when you have no clue what you're talking about.

              Comment

              • #67
                Curtis
                Senior Member
                • Oct 2008
                • 1443

                25. Postmasters
                26. Post Office Station or Branch Manager for deer brought to their post office.
                Isn't there a court case involving firearms on post office property/parking lot? I would like to see have the post office sign off on a deer.

                Comment

                • #68
                  Spirit 1
                  Senior Member
                  • Jan 2009
                  • 591

                  Seems that a very large part of the problem is that some, or now many, in these fed & state agencies like DFG are much more into 'Managing Wetlands' and 'Managing wildlife populations' as in CONTROL over our natural resources, which they consider THEIR resources, rather than making them available to America's citizens. They are apparently more concerned about hunters killing THEIR animals and fishermen killing THEIR fish than they are about fundamental human & Constitutional rights of access to OUR RESOURCES or Consitutionally guaranteed protections while doing so.

                  Comment

                  • #69
                    Arrowhunters5
                    Member
                    • Jun 2009
                    • 107

                    I really worry about my family members that can not carry a sidearm while bow hunting. Our area we hunt is strangled my cartel MJ gardens. So much so that we refer the increase of late night and seasonal activity as "cartel traffic."

                    It's a sad day when a family is trying maintain their traditions of deer camp and no one wants to venture too far from the main roads. It is so bad we routinely run across plastic piping near major road ways.

                    To deprive a citizen of their 2nd amendment rights to defend themselves, simply because he/she chooses to bow hunt, is disgusting.

                    I am an awesome marksman with my pistol, but no where near as accurate as I am with a bow at 25 yards and beyond. So to say bow hunters will "cheat" is a joke. Even a noobie bow hunter is typically more accurate than the average pistol shooter, IMHO.
                    GO DUCKS

                    Comment

                    • #70
                      Spelunker
                      Member
                      • Jul 2007
                      • 458

                      Sooo, any word on this from the higher ups (AKA people in the know)?

                      Comment

                      • #71
                        Don Edmondson
                        Member
                        • May 2010
                        • 377

                        Originally posted by pointedstick
                        Birdshot is for little birds. If you have to fire your gun, it's because there is a grave threat to your life and you need to STOP that threat. Birdshot will not physically stop a human threat. It may convince them to retreat (being shot with anything at all is gonna suck), but it will not do anything to physically make the attack stop. You need at least 12" of penetration for that to even really be a possibility, and you're still going to need to aim for the vitals. Birdshot may (may!) penetrate 3-4" if you're lucky. It's just gonna give them nasty painful flesh wounds.
                        You people that believe that bird shot at 6 to 20 feet is not lethal are not well informed you can prove it to your self just take your shotgun with #7 or #8 shot and shot a pigs head, or watermelon at 6 foot there will be a 2to3 inch hole bet you cant live with that hole in your head or chest. All old hunters know in big bear country shot guns are your best friend Don

                        Comment

                        • #72
                          tpuig
                          Senior Member
                          • Jun 2005
                          • 2163

                          This does bring a smile to my face..


                          Originally posted by GOEX FFF
                          I love these kinds of responces -
                          NRA LIFE Member

                          Comment

                          • #73
                            hoffmang
                            I need a LIFE!!
                            • Apr 2006
                            • 18448

                            The action on this isn't CGF but another entity. Not everyone moves as quickly as CGF.

                            -Gene
                            Gene Hoffman
                            Chairman, California Gun Rights Foundation

                            DONATE NOW
                            to support the rights of California gun owners. Follow @cgfgunrights on Twitter.
                            Opinions posted in this account are my own and not the approved position of any organization.
                            I read PMs. But, if you need a response, include an email address or email me directly!


                            "The problem with being a gun rights supporter is that the left hates guns and the right hates rights." -Anon

                            Comment

                            • #74
                              locosway
                              I need a LIFE!!
                              • Jun 2009
                              • 11346

                              Originally posted by hoffmang
                              I recommend genocide for Cottonmouths...



                              3" to 4" of penetration is far too survivable on average for home defense. One wants an attack to stop. The way to do that is to do damage to the CNS. Ribs are quite capable of stopping that. FBI recommends 12" of penetration for self defense rounds.

                              -Gene
                              12" minimum, but more is better.
                              OCSD Approved CCW Instructor
                              NRA Certified Instructor
                              CA DOJ Certified Instructor
                              Glock Certified Armorer

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1