For ease I will be typing in the first person. Edit: I live in Ontario, CA and I am trying to understand these 2 laws in question.
I live in Free America and I own guns. For some strange reason I decided to move to California. I do some research and find PC 12072 f(2)(a)
I decide to comply with PC 12072 f(2)(a) by implementing clause (ii)Sell or transfer the firearm in accordance with the provisions of subdivision (d) or in accordance with the provisions of an exemption from subdivision (d).
So, my intention is to move to CA and sell my handguns in compliance of PC 12072 f(2)(a) clasue (ii).
Then I find PC 12125 (a)
Now this code says that my plans to comply with PC 12072 f(2)(a) clause (ii) is in direct violation of PC 12125 (a)
How can this be?
But I continue to read PC 12125 and find 12125 (c)
I understand "Violations of subdivision (a) are cumulative with respect to each handgun" means that they can charge you for 3 counts of violation if you manufacture, import, sell 3 guns.
But what does "shall not be construed as restricting the application of any other law" mean?
The way I read it that one part of that sentence makes PC 12125 (a) not applicable to PC 12072 f(2)(a) clause (ii).
Is my logic wrong?
Edit: I removed the word "section" and replaced it with "clause"
I live in Free America and I own guns. For some strange reason I decided to move to California. I do some research and find PC 12072 f(2)(a)
Originally posted by PC 12072 f(2)(a)
So, my intention is to move to CA and sell my handguns in compliance of PC 12072 f(2)(a) clasue (ii).
Then I find PC 12125 (a)
Originally posted by PC 12125 (a)
How can this be?
But I continue to read PC 12125 and find 12125 (c)
Originally posted by PC 12125 (c)
But what does "shall not be construed as restricting the application of any other law" mean?
The way I read it that one part of that sentence makes PC 12125 (a) not applicable to PC 12072 f(2)(a) clause (ii).
Is my logic wrong?
Edit: I removed the word "section" and replaced it with "clause"
Comment