Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Ammunition Ban Violates Second Amendment

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #16
    wash
    Calguns Addict
    • Aug 2007
    • 9011

    Originally posted by wildhawker
    Irrelevant; as written, and ignoring any other constitutional issues, it fails on preemption grounds. Read the 3 cases, and stay tuned for some *interesting* revelations about AB962.
    I can't wait to hear those!
    sigpic
    Originally posted by oaklander
    Dear Kevin,

    You suck!!! Your are wrong!!! Stop it!!!
    Proud CGF and CGN donor. SAF life member. Former CRPA member. Gpal beta tester (it didn't work). NRA member.

    Comment

    • #17
      stix213
      AKA: Joe Censored
      CGN Contributor - Lifetime
      • Apr 2009
      • 18998

      Linking ammunition with the right to bear arms sounds to me like any attempt to say UOC was the lawful manner of the "bear" side of the 2A would fail for certain, if that's even being tried.

      Comment

      • #18
        Librarian
        Admin and Poltergeist
        CGN Contributor - Lifetime
        • Oct 2005
        • 44626

        Originally posted by bomb_on_bus
        is there any chance AB962 can be amended so it wont be weakened by these cases and outcomes or are we in fact seeing a light at the end of the tunnel?
        That would require a new bill, not sooner than January and not out of the process sooner than about July.

        There are ways to get emergency legislation through, but this topic probably wouldn't qualify - would need the Governor to make a proclamation requiring a session on 'crime' or some such. (Extraordinary session, urgency bill, 2/3 majority in each house would be the 'cleanest' version; in regular session, Speaker can approve introduction of a bill after deadline, supermajority - 54 - votes can change deadlines and such.)
        ARCHIVED Calguns Foundation Wiki here: http://web.archive.org/web/201908310...itle=Main_Page

        Frozen in 2015, it is falling out of date and I can no longer edit the content. But much of it is still good!

        Comment

        • #19
          N6ATF
          Banned
          • Jul 2007
          • 8383

          Ooh, "coextensive", words like that make me randy, baby.

          Comment

          • #20
            yellowfin
            Calguns Addict
            • Nov 2007
            • 8371

            This has immediate application against NYC and NJ which have ammo possession bans, the former being a felony charge.
            "You can't stop insane people from doing insane things with insane laws. That's insane!" -- Penn Jillette
            Originally posted by indiandave
            In Pennsylvania Your permit to carry concealed is called a License to carry fire arms. Other states call it a CCW. In New Jersey it's called a crime.
            Discretionary Issue is the new Separate but Equal.

            Comment

            • #21
              bigstick61
              Veteran Member
              • May 2008
              • 3202

              Originally posted by yellowfin
              This has immediate application against NYC and NJ which have ammo possession bans, the former being a felony charge.
              Didn't someone driving through D.C. who had his car searched get in trouble this week for ammo possession? D.C. has some pretty screwed up laws. Hopefully the guy gets a good lawyer who takes advantage of these 2nd Amendment cases.

              Comment

              • #22
                QQQ
                Senior Member
                • Apr 2010
                • 2243

                Ah sheeze- don't even get me started on DC's gun laws. Folks talk about how nice it would be to move from CA to AZ- believe me, moving from DC to CA feels kinda like that.

                And yes, in order to even possess ANY sort of ammunition, be it rifle or handgun, you need to have a valid firearms license for a firearm of the same caliber. And you can't take it out of your home unless you're going hunting or to the range. And heaven forbid you're one of the hundreds of thousands of DC residents who cannot afford to have a car- you don't have a snowball's chance in hell of exercising your RKBA. It doesn't surprise me the least bit that they smacked someone for carrying ammunition in their car.
                And yes, even long guns must be licensed and registered- a process which involves expenses running into the hundreds as well as a course on handgun safety (regardless of whether you plan to register a handgun, rifle, or shotgun). DC is the Brady Bunch's wet dream. Kinda sad and funny that in spite of all this, DC still has one of the highest firearm homicide rates in the country.
                Last edited by QQQ; 11-04-2010, 11:54 PM.

                Comment

                • #23
                  obeygiant
                  CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                  CGN Contributor
                  • Oct 2007
                  • 4167

                  Originally posted by N6ATF
                  Ooh, "coextensive", words like that make me randy, baby.
                  sigpic
                  Member, CRPA Board of Directors
                  "No one could make a greater mistake than he who did nothing because he could do only a little." - Edmund Burke

                  Search Calguns using Google
                  CGN Search plugin for Firefox & IE CA Shotgun AW ID Flowchart CA Handgun AW ID Flowchart CA Senate CA Assembly Anti-2A Search Plugin

                  Comment

                  • #24
                    Kavey
                    Member
                    • Oct 2010
                    • 104

                    Appellate ruling - 2nd Amendment protects ammo

                    This is my first post on Calguns.net, so please be gentle with me.

                    Because of the upcoming legal battles over AB962, I thought that yesterday's D.C. Appellate Court decision might be of significance. It appears to be the first ruling that holds that ammunition is protected by the Second Amendment. How about some of you crackerjack legal brains look this over and tell us what you think.

                    From Herrington v. United States, decided today by D.C.’s highest court (the D.C. Court of Appeals): Appellant Kevin Herrington was convicted in 2006 of unlawful possession of ammunition (UA), in violation of D.C. Code § 7-2506.01 (2001) (now § 7-2506.01(a) (Supp. 2010)). His conviction was based solely on evidence that he possessed handgun ammunition in […]
                    sigpic

                    Comment

                    • #25
                      foxtrotuniformlima
                      Veteran Member
                      • Nov 2008
                      • 3445

                      Unfortunately, anything that happens in the District of Columbia gets little to no play in the rest of the US.

                      It is a great ruling, don't get me wrong, but just like Heller, it only affects The District until the SCOTUS rules on it.
                      Anyone press will hear the fat lady sing.

                      Originally posted by Vin Scully
                      Don't be sad that it's over. Smile because it happened.
                      Originally posted by William James
                      I cannot allow your ignorance, however great, to take precedence over my knowledge, however small.
                      Originally posted by BigPimping
                      When you reach the plateau, there's always going to be those that try to drag you down. Just keep up the game, collect the scratch, and ignore those who seek to drag you down to their level.
                      .

                      Comment

                      • #26
                        Librarian
                        Admin and Poltergeist
                        CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                        • Oct 2005
                        • 44626

                        Astonishingly, the first thread on this has already dropped down to third page ... merged.

                        Good first post, though.
                        ARCHIVED Calguns Foundation Wiki here: http://web.archive.org/web/201908310...itle=Main_Page

                        Frozen in 2015, it is falling out of date and I can no longer edit the content. But much of it is still good!

                        Comment

                        • #27
                          yellowfin
                          Calguns Addict
                          • Nov 2007
                          • 8371

                          They really could have and should have left "in the home" out of that ruling. Why didn't they?
                          "You can't stop insane people from doing insane things with insane laws. That's insane!" -- Penn Jillette
                          Originally posted by indiandave
                          In Pennsylvania Your permit to carry concealed is called a License to carry fire arms. Other states call it a CCW. In New Jersey it's called a crime.
                          Discretionary Issue is the new Separate but Equal.

                          Comment

                          • #28
                            Librarian
                            Admin and Poltergeist
                            CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                            • Oct 2005
                            • 44626

                            Originally posted by yellowfin
                            They really could have and should have left "in the home" out of that ruling. Why didn't they?
                            Because that was the wording of the appeal (page 6 and other places).
                            ARCHIVED Calguns Foundation Wiki here: http://web.archive.org/web/201908310...itle=Main_Page

                            Frozen in 2015, it is falling out of date and I can no longer edit the content. But much of it is still good!

                            Comment

                            • #29
                              yellowfin
                              Calguns Addict
                              • Nov 2007
                              • 8371

                              So we're back to waiting on Palmer...again. What in the heck is STILL taking so long?!?
                              "You can't stop insane people from doing insane things with insane laws. That's insane!" -- Penn Jillette
                              Originally posted by indiandave
                              In Pennsylvania Your permit to carry concealed is called a License to carry fire arms. Other states call it a CCW. In New Jersey it's called a crime.
                              Discretionary Issue is the new Separate but Equal.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1