How about the one that says I can't carry a gun in CA? That's the only one that matters.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you colud have one Gun Law Abolished!
Collapse
X
-
www.christopherjhoffman.com
The Second Amendment is the one right that is so fundamental that the inability to exercise it, should the need arise, would render all other rights null and void. Dead people have no rights.
Magna est veritas et praevalebit -
Comment
-
I don't like these polls because there is never just one to pick.
It also brings to light on how much this state has taken advantage of our rights.
They've dismissed our constitutional rights and spat on us. This is still happening today...laws passed by emotion and not common sense or facts.Last edited by Ding126; 06-22-2010, 10:15 PM.sigpicComment
-
I abhor the roster
Lets just start from Scratch. Standard Federal 4473 form. Ability to buy guns in any state and bring them back to our home state. Lets limit interstate FTF purchases to 1 in 30 days, no wait, cash and carry with COE. Still have background checks. Still have FFL's for shipping guns. 03 FFL with COE in state cash and carry. No 1 in 30. CCW shall issue with 8 hour defensive training class. No interview, no buddy system. Class certification, COE, application, issue. Loss of COE, loss of permit. Roster, what roster, old news. Same with DROS.. bye bye.
10 day wait, not really a big deal except for FTF in State transfers over long distance, hence 03FFL + COE exemption.
Opps without DROS this wouldn't be an issue. OK I need to refer to committee on person to person transfers.
My main concern is handguns. So I would volunteer to be on the handgun committee to revise the state of decay.
I leave the minutia of detail to the AR guys for AW revisions.
+1 ExcellentBecause Miller basically stated that weapons without military/militia application do not have as much protection under the 2A, it seems like it should actually be cited as precedent in favor of overturning "AW" bans.
California's "AW" bans have specifically targeted firearms that have the most resemblance (physical and practical) with actual military firearms, and that use parts and ammunition that re interchangeable with military arms - things that make them the most suitable firearms for citizens to use in their capacity as an unorganized "militia", either serving independently, or in conjunction with the active duty and reserve components of the armed forces.
Flash suppressor - useful for militia.
Bayonet lug - useful for militia.
High Cap magazine - useful for militia.
Detachable magazine - useful for militia.
Ability to accept standard GI M-16/M-4 mags, ammo, and spare parts - useful for militia.
The unfortunate side effect of such a legal challenge to the patently unconstitutional "AW" bans is that it could then be used as an argument in favor of banning all firearms that are not in military calibers or military-type configurations.Last edited by Malthusian; 06-22-2010, 6:16 PM."While it may come as a surprise to the authors of the legislation, most semi-automatic pistols do in fact come with a pistol grip"Malthusianism is the idea that population growth is potentially exponential while the growth of the food supply is arithmetical at best.Comment
-
http://www.norcalmedtac.com
Providing CPR and First Aid training, to small groups and individuals; NRA classes; Defensive Medicine, Defensive Pistol, Defensive Carbine, and Defensive Shotgun classes.
sigpicComment
-
I wonder if they considered the remington 870 MCS systemThat's how it was debated for decades, but really Miller didn't directly address the individual right vs collective (militia) right issue. Neither Miller nor Layton were a part of any militia, the only thing that the court addressed was the SBS's perceived lack of suitability as a military weapon.
indeed configured as a breaching or QCB weapon that obviously needs to be short.you don't rise to the occasion,
you just fall back on your level of training.Comment
-
I don't think those existed in 1939
And the other thing to remember is that there was nobody to argue the other side of the case to SCOTUS at the time. Neither Miller nor his attorney went to Washington or even submitted a brief...the solicitor general got to say whatever he wanted without rebuttal. By the time the court issued its opinion Miller had been dead for a month.Comment
-
+1 for the list.
How can a handgun be deemed safe for a year and, because the manufacturer did not pay the ransom, become unsafe?
OGComment
-
How about getting to the root of the matter. Abolish the leftist dimocrats and their Rino buddies.!Comment
-
Not at present. However, at present it would be very easy to get the legislature to amend the law if one were to start selling online.
...this will probably become significantly harder to do post-Macdonald, although the need for an armored car company middleman would probably be short-lived anyway.Primary author of gunwiki.net - 'like' it on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Gunwiki/242578512591 to see whenever new content gets added!Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,857,636
Posts: 25,034,517
Members: 354,530
Active Members: 6,324
Welcome to our newest member, Boocatini.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 37788 users online. 170 members and 37618 guests.
Most users ever online was 65,177 at 8:20 PM on 09-21-2024.

Comment