Where and why would YOU put limits on RKBA?

[Meplat]

Oh boy! Do I really have to lead you by the hand. You said that: "by the time there is a need to use anti-tank mines, tow missiles and grenades against a tyrannical government, it will be a Civil War between two or more Governments and their militaries.

The Davidians could have used ant-tank weapons against a tyrannical Government. And they were not a government. If you believe they were or that it was done "for the children". I'm sorry, but you are too far gone for me to help.

Where did I discuss the Branch Davidians?



You provoke nerd rage in me.

[Meplat]

Thank you.

Meplat - You're 100% right about the letters of marque and Privateers. Forgot about 'em!

[rolo]

The Davidians could have used ant-tank weapons against a tyrannical Government. And they were not a government. If you believe they were or that it was done "for the children". I'm sorry, but you are too far gone for me to help.

You ignored the entirety of the discussion that was being had before you came in and cherry picked your two word rebuttal! I had to drag out an answer from you and you trotted out something that has no relation to the issues being discussed except in some grandiose fantasy you have about the little guy sticking it to the man.

What was being discussed before you called bull**** on my post was the legalities of revolution. Did the Branch Davidians have legal standing? Did they have the backing of the people? Did they examine every avenue? Were they attempting to uphold the constitution or participate in society in any way?

The government ****ed up in Waco. The Branch Davidians ****ed up in Waco. That's not up for debate. You missed the point of the entire conversation.

[Meplat]

Could be, but my answer to that particular post, I stand behind. And I think it relevant.

You ignored the entirety of the discussion that was being had before you came in and cherry picked your two word rebuttal! I had to drag out an answer from you and you trotted out something that has no relation to the issues being discussed except in some grandiose fantasy you have about the little guy sticking it to the man.

What was being discussed before you called bull**** on my post was the legalities of revolution. Did the Branch Davidians have legal standing? Did they have the backing of the people? Did they examine every avenue? Were they attempting to uphold the constitution or participate in society in any way?

The government ****ed up in Waco. The Branch Davidians ****ed up in Waco. That's not up for debate. You missed the point of the entire conversation.

[rolo]

Could be, but my answer to that particular post, I stand behind. And I think it relevant.

Yes, I'm sure you do. Thanks for participating Meplat.

[HondaMasterTech]

Our government has used them with the intent to kill twice, to the best of MY knowledge. If these devices were in the hands of the general population, we probably wouldn't have a planet left.

[HondaMasterTech]

Where did I discuss the Branch Davidians?

You provoke nerd rage in me.

Is this someone who should be able to own a nuclear device?

[FeuerFrei]

Any "firearm" should be allowed with full responsibility born by the barer/citizen for it's use or misuse.
Nukes? Artillery? Mortars? Battle ships? Nope.
Come on...be realistic.

[aklon]

Individual weapons, yes.

Crew served weapons, no.

Rocket borne projectile weapons, no.

Everything else: you bet. We're American citizens.

[wash]

I want rockets.

I want crew served.

I can find a crew.

Explosives are cool, I would keep a spool of det-cord if I could. Flash-bangs would be good for self defense too.

[Scratch705]

if you can pay for it, you can own it in my opinion.

since i doubt there are that many ego-manical, supervillians that are billionaires that can own nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons.
(terrorist groups don't count since they won't register the weapons)

although let me know when one of you calgunners can afford to purchase a nuclear powered aircraft carrier. i want to launch a car with the catapult... haha

[Meplat]

We were talking about anti-tank weapons Dip-Sh*t.

Is this someone who should be able to own a nuclear device?

[Meplat]

In reality, nothing bars ownership of anything but the ability to pay for it. If you think you can vote anything out of existence, or the UN can stop the most wacked out nut jobs from getting anything they want, you are delusional.

[HondaMasterTech]

We were talking about anti-tank weapons Dip-Sh*t.

So to reiterate the question: should we, as individuals, have the right to keep and bear strategic nuclear arms?

That was copied and pasted from the Original Post. That's what I was talking about, Dip-Sh*t.

[Scratch705]

So to reiterate the question: should we, as individuals, have the right to keep and bear strategic nuclear arms?

That was copied and pasted from the Original Post. That's what I was talking about, Dip-Sh*t.

yep. if you can afford the millions if not billions it cost to obtain it in the first place.