Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

HUNT V. CA: Declaration of Ignatius Chinn

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • E Pluribus Unum
    Calguns Addict
    • Dec 2006
    • 8097

    We may disagree with Iggy and his coworkers with regards to their stances on firearms but let us not forget the fact that despite what they do to us, the law-abiding citizen, they are out there risking their lives stopping or at least trying to stop real crimes.

    Even in a worst case scenario he is doing his job despite what his personal views are. The blame falls strickly upon the shoulders of the legislature and the Governor at the time. Mr. Gay Davis.
    Originally posted by Alan Gura
    The Second Amendment now applies to state and local governments. Our lawsuit is a reminder to state and local bureaucrats that we have a Bill of Rights in this country, not a Bill of Needs
    Originally posted by hoffmang
    12050[CCW] licenses will be shall issue soon.

    -Gene
    sigpic

    Comment

    • DrjonesUSA
      Veteran Member
      • Dec 2005
      • 4680

      Originally posted by E Pluribus Unum
      We may disagree with Iggy and his coworkers with regards to their stances on firearms but let us not forget the fact that despite what they do to us, the law-abiding citizen, they are out there risking their lives stopping or at least trying to stop real crimes.

      Even in a worst case scenario he is doing his job despite what his personal views are. The blame falls strickly upon the shoulders of the legislature and the Governor at the time. Mr. Gay Davis.

      That's a spectacularly lame "argument".

      The truth isn't something you are allowed to have an opinion about. Second Amendment supporters are absolutely right and those who work to destroy the Second Amendment and prevent people from exercising their rights protected by the 2A are dead wrong.

      As far as "doing the job despite their personal views", it's pretty clear what the Deputy AGs personal view on guns is: she hates them and hates gun owners.

      She should be tried for Treason.

      She is so grossly abusing her office in order to force her personal agenda on law-abiding American citizens that it is positively sickening.

      "I was only doing my job" has already been proven to be an unacceptable defense in a court of law.

      Not only is it not a valid legal excuse, but people should be thrown in jail for having such a gaping lack of morals and backbone that they would "just do their job" despite their personal views on it.

      All you people who say, "well, at the end of the day they are people just doing their job" are hurting our cause.

      You talk as if its a game or something.

      This is a real fight for our rights, freedom and for our very lives.

      Those who do not own guns exist solely at the whim of those who DO own guns, whether they are criminals wearing badges or those without them.
      Last edited by DrjonesUSA; 12-07-2006, 11:26 PM.

      Comment

      • E Pluribus Unum
        Calguns Addict
        • Dec 2006
        • 8097

        Originally posted by DrjonesUSA
        That's a spectacularly lame "argument".

        The truth isn't something you are allowed to have an opinion about. Second Amendment supporters are absolutely right and those who work to destroy the Second Amendment and prevent people from exercising their rights protected by the 2A are dead wrong.

        As far as "doing the job despite their personal views", it's pretty clear what the Deputy AGs personal view on guns is: she hates them and hates gun owners.

        She should be tried for Treason.

        She is so grossly abusing her office in order to force her personal agenda on law-abiding American citizens that it is positively sickening.

        "I was only doing my job" has already been proven to be an unacceptable defense in a court of law.

        Not only is it not a valid legal excuse, but people should be thrown in jail for having such a gaping lack of morals and backbone that they would "just do their job" despite their personal views on it.

        All you people who say, "well, at the end of the day they are people just doing their job" are hurting our cause.

        You talk as if its a game or something.

        This is a real fight for our rights, freedom and for our very lives.

        Those who do not own guns exist solely at the whim of those who DO own guns, whether they are criminals wearing badges or those without them.
        You are preaching to the choir and I am in no way arguing FOR him. All I am saying is despite what he does to us (the evil) he is not all bad.
        Originally posted by Alan Gura
        The Second Amendment now applies to state and local governments. Our lawsuit is a reminder to state and local bureaucrats that we have a Bill of Rights in this country, not a Bill of Needs
        Originally posted by hoffmang
        12050[CCW] licenses will be shall issue soon.

        -Gene
        sigpic

        Comment

        • DrjonesUSA
          Veteran Member
          • Dec 2005
          • 4680

          Originally posted by E Pluribus Unum
          You are preaching to the choir and I am in no way arguing FOR him. All I am saying is despite what he does to us (the evil) he is not all bad.

          And I'm saying that you could not possibly be more wrong.

          The Second Amendment is the most important of all the amendments because without it, we have NO rights.

          You have no right to life without guns, you have no freedom of speech without guns, you have NOTHING if you do not have guns because you can only actually exercise rights that you can defend, and you cannot defend anything without weapons.

          Anyone actively working to persecute people for exercising their rights protected by the Second Amendment are as evil as it gets, period.

          You're probably thinking that Iggy could be a nice guy to hit the gym with, or to sit down and have a beer with, and you know what? You could well be right.

          I'm sure he's probably a likeable human being, but that certainly does not change the fact that he and others in his office are actively working to undermine the Constitution and persecute innocent American citizens simply for exercising their rights, and that is positively unforgivable.

          Saddam looks like he could be related to me, and I'm sure he could be pretty nice to sit and have a cup of coffee with, but that doesn't change the fact that he did evil things, nor does it excuse him from his evildoings.

          Comment

          • Kestryll
            Head Janitor
            • Oct 2005
            • 21580

            Originally posted by DrjonesUSA
            And I'm saying that you could not possibly be more wrong.

            The Second Amendment is the most important of all the amendments because without it, we have NO rights.

            You have no right to life without guns, you have no freedom of speech without guns, you have NOTHING if you do not have guns because you can only actually exercise rights that you can defend, and you cannot defend anything without weapons.

            Anyone actively working to persecute people for exercising their rights protected by the Second Amendment are as evil as it gets, period.

            You're probably thinking that Iggy could be a nice guy to hit the gym with, or to sit down and have a beer with, and you know what? You could well be right.

            I'm sure he's probably a likeable human being, but that certainly does not change the fact that he and others in his office are actively working to undermine the Constitution and persecute innocent American citizens simply for exercising their rights, and that is positively unforgivable.

            Saddam looks like he could be related to me, and I'm sure he could be pretty nice to sit and have a cup of coffee with, but that doesn't change the fact that he did evil things, nor does it excuse him from his evildoings.
            Are you comparing the DOJ personnel to Saddam Hussein?
            That has to be the dumbest thing I've seen in a while if you are.
            If not then a little clarification might be in order to avoid confusion.
            sigpic NRA Benefactor Life Member / CRPA Life Member / SAF Life Member
            Calguns.net an incorported entity - President.
            The Calguns Shooting Sports Assoc. - Vice President.
            The California Rifle & Pistol Assoc. - Director.
            DONATE TO NRA-ILA, CGSSA, AND CRPAF NOW!
            Opinions posted in this account are my own and unless specifically stated as such are not the approved position of Calguns.net, CGSSA or CRPA.

            Comment

            • Joe
              Calguns Addict
              • Apr 2006
              • 5730

              Originally posted by kap
              Especially with those two pistol grips right next to the grenade. Just think of how much more dangerous that grenade would be it it had a pistol grip attached to it.
              Pistol grips on the grenade Now the grenades can be sprayed randomly without having to reload.

              Comment

              • E Pluribus Unum
                Calguns Addict
                • Dec 2006
                • 8097

                Originally posted by DrjonesUSA
                And I'm saying that you could not possibly be more wrong.

                The Second Amendment is the most important of all the amendments because without it, we have NO rights.

                You have no right to life without guns, you have no freedom of speech without guns, you have NOTHING if you do not have guns because you can only actually exercise rights that you can defend, and you cannot defend anything without weapons.

                Anyone actively working to persecute people for exercising their rights protected by the Second Amendment are as evil as it gets, period.

                You're probably thinking that Iggy could be a nice guy to hit the gym with, or to sit down and have a beer with, and you know what? You could well be right.

                I'm sure he's probably a likeable human being, but that certainly does not change the fact that he and others in his office are actively working to undermine the Constitution and persecute innocent American citizens simply for exercising their rights, and that is positively unforgivable.

                Saddam looks like he could be related to me, and I'm sure he could be pretty nice to sit and have a cup of coffee with, but that doesn't change the fact that he did evil things, nor does it excuse him from his evildoings.
                You have once again misunderstood what I am saying. Please do not spout off to me anymore about "gun control is evil and why" because we are in 100% agreement.

                I understand the evils that he has done in his office. I am in no way condoning what he did. My point is this: He is simply one man, doing what he perceives to be his job as he is sworn to do. He is misguided, I agree but I highly doubt his intent is malicious.

                My point is this: Chinn is just a soldier; if you want to get mad at someone and alter what’s going on focusing on Chinn is a mistake as he is a nobody. Focus on people like Don Perata, Paul Koretz, Diane Fienstine, Barbara Boxer, Gray Davis, Mike Roos, David Roberti, Andres Soto, Jack Rackove and the many other influential people who instigate and proliferate this tendency. Without those people Chinn would be powerless to do anything despite what he thinks personally.

                Furthermore, the video that was presented was not about taking our guns. The video that was presented was about keeping Chinese mobsters in jail rather than brokering deals to let them out. I agree with that so it only proves that it is not all bad; I happen to agree with the statement he made.
                Originally posted by Alan Gura
                The Second Amendment now applies to state and local governments. Our lawsuit is a reminder to state and local bureaucrats that we have a Bill of Rights in this country, not a Bill of Needs
                Originally posted by hoffmang
                12050[CCW] licenses will be shall issue soon.

                -Gene
                sigpic

                Comment

                • Joe
                  Calguns Addict
                  • Apr 2006
                  • 5730

                  ^^ I think a lot of people shared that view about them "just doing their job" but that whole idea was pretty much destroyed by AM when we read her emails exposing her agenda. It was 100% clear she was not "just doing her job", she was pushing her agenda.

                  To my knowledge, Iggy has not been exposed like AM has. But that does not mean he isn't also pushing a personal agenda.

                  Comment

                  • E Pluribus Unum
                    Calguns Addict
                    • Dec 2006
                    • 8097

                    Originally posted by Joe
                    ^^ I think a lot of people shared that view about them "just doing their job" but that whole idea was pretty much destroyed by AM when we read her emails exposing her agenda. It was 100% clear she was not "just doing her job", she was pushing her agenda.

                    To my knowledge, Iggy has not been exposed like AM has. But that does not mean he isn't also pushing a personal agenda.
                    Again irrelevant. You are focusing on the wrong area. They are soldiers; we need to target the Generals.

                    I'm done arguing. I have stated my opinion; you are free to disagree if you choose.
                    Originally posted by Alan Gura
                    The Second Amendment now applies to state and local governments. Our lawsuit is a reminder to state and local bureaucrats that we have a Bill of Rights in this country, not a Bill of Needs
                    Originally posted by hoffmang
                    12050[CCW] licenses will be shall issue soon.

                    -Gene
                    sigpic

                    Comment

                    • Draven
                      Member
                      • Oct 2005
                      • 396

                      Chinn is not a Soldier, the thugs under him are soldiers. He is an Officer at the very least, and should act like one.

                      Comment

                      • Can'thavenuthingood
                        C3 Leader
                        CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                        • Oct 2005
                        • 5246

                        Chinn is enforcing the law through his own interpretation.
                        He is a symptom of bad law and hiring practices by those with an agenda.

                        The target is the legislature and reform or repeal of those laws.
                        That is done through the legislature which is full of leftist Democrats appointing and hiring Chinn types throughout the government.

                        Vick
                        sigpic

                        "Nobody ever defended anything successfully, there is only attack and attack and attack some more." (George Patton)

                        Picnic Time

                        Comment

                        • luvtolean
                          Senior Member
                          • Aug 2006
                          • 2063

                          Thugs?

                          Come on. I still believe the people there want to do what they believe is best for people.

                          I believe in AM is doing what SHE believes is for people's ultimate benefit. Though I STRONGLY disagree with her.

                          There are problems at the DOJ, but from what I've seen it comes from management allowing people to push their own agendas, which has led to a total lack of cohesion in message.

                          Comment

                          • Mute
                            Calguns Addict
                            • Oct 2005
                            • 8446

                            Originally posted by luvtolean
                            Thugs?

                            Come on. I still believe the people there want to do what they believe is best for people.

                            I believe in AM is doing what SHE believes is for people's ultimate benefit. Though I STRONGLY disagree with her.

                            There are problems at the DOJ, but from what I've seen it comes from management allowing people to push their own agendas, which has led to a total lack of cohesion in message.
                            After reading the Cal NRA alert pdf, I don't believe that anymore. AM clearly has no interest in what is best for the people but just wishes to carry out a personal vendetta against California gunowners and more specifically those who own OLLs.
                            NRA Benefactor Life Member
                            NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Personal Protection In The Home, Personal Protection Outside The Home Instructor, CA DOJ Certified CCW Instructor, RSO


                            American Marksman Training Group
                            Visit our American Marksman Facebook Page

                            Comment

                            • luvtolean
                              Senior Member
                              • Aug 2006
                              • 2063

                              You very well may be right. I tend to be an optimist.

                              I think most antis really do have misguided notions about what causes crime, and how to stop it...but hell, maybe we've caused her enough grief that she's downright just pissed at us.

                              In the end, it doesn't really matter. She wants to take our guns away, that much is clear...

                              Comment

                              • DrjonesUSA
                                Veteran Member
                                • Dec 2005
                                • 4680


                                Ok. I agree that his intent is probably (likely) not malicious and I completely agree that we should focus attention/efforts on the higher-ups.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1