Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
New regs are out (Large-Capacity Magazine rules)
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
You have to read the rest of the new proposed statute though.
Both of those methods qualify as a permanently reduced according to the DOJ. It does not say anything about roll pins and it does not imply other methods meet the standard. While one could argue that the proposed regulations require both epoxy and a rivet, that is due to sentence structure, not meaning.
If you asked someone at the DOJ "How can I permanently reduce the capacity of my mags?" and they read the proposed regulations, their answer would be "Both inserting a mag block and epoxying the floor plate to the magazine body - and - inserting a mag block and riveting it in place through the floor plate or side wall of the magazine body - will permanently reduce the capacity of the magazine"
They will not say, "Or any other method that permanently affixes the floor plate to the magazine body."
They have now defined what permanent means. Both of those methods meet the definition of permanent. Although it is easy to disagree with what is actually permanent, it is clear as day to me what their intent was.
Also, the purported proposed regulations (for which an official url link has NOT been provided) only give an example of what would be acceptable to DOJ. Concerning epoxy and rivets, one is not mandated to perform as in the regulations if one is in compliance with the statute, PC 16740, by using other methods.Last edited by ifilef; 12-20-2016, 9:48 AM.Comment
-
Bold. You are confusing the statute with the regulations. Don't call a regulation a statute because it is NOT a statute.
Also, the purported proposed regulations (for which an official url link has NOT been provided) only give an example of what would be acceptable to DOJ. Concerning epoxy and rivets, one is not mandated to perform as in the regulations if one is in compliance with the statute, PC 16740, by using other methods.
Thats about as official as it gets. It was also posted in post 3 of this thread.
What I mean regarding these statutes/regulations... it's pretty simple. This is what is likely to become law.
"The regulations have been submitted under California’s emergency rulemaking process, which means they could become effective in just 17 days."Comment
-
https://oag.ca.gov/sites/all/files/a...xt-of-regs.pdf
Thats about as official as it gets. It was also posted in post 3 of this thread.
What I mean regarding these statutes/regulations... it's pretty simple. This is what is likely to become law.
"The regulations have been submitted under California’s emergency rulemaking process, which means they could become effective in just 17 days."Comment
-
I can't believe this thread. Why don't you all just bend over and take it up the ********, but only after you have installed your rivets, and have epoxied everything, even your dignity?
Lookit, some may have purchased Hexmags blocked to 10 rounds.
From a practical standpoint, I don't think that any cop cares so long as only 10 fit in the mag.
And, frankly, it's hard to imagine where a LE would demand an inspection. They could probably care less about it and have more important things to do.As for me, I think if I go in prepared to encounter Kamala Harris incarnate in uniform, I'll be able to show that I have done my best to comply with (work around/within) the new, albeit $#itty, regs. And all for just a little effort on my part. I really dont care to gamble when there is no payout for me, but only the potential for huge loss. Whether my mag is riveted, epoxied, or welded shut I won't be opening it back up due to these rules. Yup, that sucks alright.
Sorry to pi$$ on your parade, but some of us are trying to help those who re looking for any guidance other than "don't comply, take the hit and spend a lot of money...ah and possibly lose all your gun rights because....you know....it's California and they like to go overboard when it comes to scarygunstuff. I got yer six bro, but only verbally cuz I won't donate any money if you get busted". Being a keyboard commando is not the same as being a spartan.
I don't know if/when the time will come to truly proclaim Molon Labe. But since none of us are drawing blood to resist our oppressors, we have to stick to the boundaries of the judicial & legislative systems. Helping to keep fellow gunners out of harm's way is a good start.Last edited by heyjerr; 12-20-2016, 10:32 AM.Do not try and bend the spoon, that's impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth...there is no spoon.Comment
-
Last edited by NationsMostWanted; 12-20-2016, 11:15 AM.CC/LTC Review Links
http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/s...0#post19921520Comment
-
-
You have to read the rest of the new proposed statute though.
Both of those methods qualify as a permanently reduced according to the DOJ. It does not say anything about roll pins and it does not imply other methods meet the standard. While one could argue that the proposed regulations require both epoxy and a rivet, that is due to sentence structure, not meaning.
If you asked someone at the DOJ "How can I permanently reduce the capacity of my mags?" and they read the proposed regulations, their answer would be "Both inserting a mag block and epoxying the floor plate to the magazine body - and - inserting a mag block and riveting it in place through the floor plate or side wall of the magazine body - will permanently reduce the capacity of the magazine"
They will not say, "Or any other method that permanently affixes the floor plate to the magazine body."
They have now defined what permanent means. Both of those methods meet the definition of permanent. Although it is easy to disagree with what is actually permanent, it is clear as day to me what their intent was.Comment
-
Per Webster, definition of both: the one as well as the other
definition of either: being the one or the other of twoDo not try and bend the spoon, that's impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth...there is no spoon.Comment
-
To clarify... come July 2017 what is the punishment if you're caught using a 10+ mag in your featureless or pistol?
Is this an infraction? Risk confiscation and a ticket?
Or Misdemeanor? And what does that mean going forward for that individual?
"Yeah, like... well, I just want to slap a hippie or two. Maybe even make them get jobs."
Comment
-
"A large-capacity magazine that is a box type can have its capacity permanently reduced by using both of the following methods:"
I think the key here is "following methods"
Per webster - a procedure or process for attaining an object
They clearly define (b) as another method when they say "and" at the end of (a)Last edited by tonyxcom; 12-20-2016, 11:46 AM.Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,852,903
Posts: 24,977,641
Members: 353,086
Active Members: 6,300
Welcome to our newest member, kylejimenez932.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 5822 users online. 194 members and 5628 guests.
Most users ever online was 65,177 at 7:20 PM on 09-21-2024.
Comment