Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

SB 347

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #16
    chris
    I need a LIFE!!
    • Apr 2006
    • 19447

    Originally posted by Inoxmark
    Wireless read either the text of the bill or at least the link above your post. This has nothing to do with drugs or reduced charges. It increases the list of firearm related offenses (only) leading to 10 year ban.
    they are just lowering the bar lower and lower soon a parking ticket will get you a 10 year ban.
    http://govnews.ca.gov/gov39mail/mail.php
    sigpic
    Thank your neighbor and fellow gun owners for passing Prop 63. For that gun control is a winning legislative agenda.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6Dj8tdSC1A
    contact the governor
    https://govnews.ca.gov/gov39mail/mail.php
    In Memory of Spc Torres May 5th 2006 al-Hillah, Iraq. I will miss you my friend.
    NRA Life Member.

    Comment

    • #17
      dms1
      Member
      • Mar 2007
      • 158

      Possession of a firearm that is not registered.
      Dave S

      Comment

      • #18
        Librarian
        Admin and Poltergeist
        CGN Contributor - Lifetime
        • Oct 2005
        • 44633

        Originally posted by dms1
        Possession of a firearm that is not registered.
        Already answered - see post 13, above.
        ARCHIVED Calguns Foundation Wiki here: http://web.archive.org/web/201908310...itle=Main_Page

        Frozen in 2015, it is falling out of date and I can no longer edit the content. But much of it is still good!

        Comment

        • #19
          ninja750r
          Member
          • Feb 2014
          • 216

          So let's say someone was arrested with an unregistered handgun 8 years ago. If this passes will they have to turn in there legally registered firearms they now own?

          Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

          Comment

          • #20
            advocatusdiaboli
            Calguns Addict
            • Sep 2009
            • 5521

            Well, on the upside, it could be worse: long guns are not included. When I went hunting at a friend's duck club a couple of years ago, I borrowed his Benelli Super Black Eagle and tried his Winchester Super SX3 Waterfowl in the blind because I wanted to purchase a waterfowl gun and we both could have faced a 10-year prohibition for that. (I ended up buying a Super SX3 Waterfowl and it has been a great purchase at $500 cheaper than the Benelli)

            Of course at this rate, they'll fix that next session.


            Many of the members take their kids and grandkids hunting there and give them (oops I meant Selling or giving possession of ammunition to a minor) shot shells (now prohibited since the law doesn't specify pistol ammunition only).

            On the bright side, we all now have good cause to apply for an FFL just so we can legally hand (oops I meant Selling or giving possession of ammunition to a minor) our children and grandchildren shot shells when duck hunting.
            Last edited by advocatusdiaboli; 08-24-2015, 9:05 AM.
            Benefactor Life Member NRA, Life Member CRPA, CGN Contributor, US Army Veteran, Black Ribbon in Memoriam for the deceased 2nd Amendment
            sigpic

            Comment

            • #21
              advocatusdiaboli
              Calguns Addict
              • Sep 2009
              • 5521

              Originally posted by ninja750r
              So let's say someone was arrested with an unregistered handgun 8 years ago. If this passes will they have to turn in there legally registered firearms they now own?

              Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
              Only if the law is retroactive, which most laws are not however firearms laws are sometimes the exception to that general rule such in some Northeastern States where you have to turn in or register all your "assault weapons" retroactively if I recall correctly (not going to support those tyrants by looking it up).

              Check the full text for that but I doubt it.
              Benefactor Life Member NRA, Life Member CRPA, CGN Contributor, US Army Veteran, Black Ribbon in Memoriam for the deceased 2nd Amendment
              sigpic

              Comment

              • #22
                randian
                Senior Member
                • May 2011
                • 1293

                "Carrying ammunition onto school grounds."

                Is a carry license an exemption to this, or is this a back-door anti-school-carry provision?

                Comment

                • #23
                  advocatusdiaboli
                  Calguns Addict
                  • Sep 2009
                  • 5521

                  Originally posted by randian
                  "Carrying ammunition onto school grounds."

                  Is a carry license an exemption to this, or is this a back-door anti-school-carry provision?
                  No exemption. Another bill is outlawing legal concealed carry on school grounds anyway. So the exemption would be moot.
                  Benefactor Life Member NRA, Life Member CRPA, CGN Contributor, US Army Veteran, Black Ribbon in Memoriam for the deceased 2nd Amendment
                  sigpic

                  Comment

                  • #24
                    wildhawker
                    I need a LIFE!!
                    • Nov 2008
                    • 14150

                    Originally posted by advocatusdiaboli
                    No exemption. Another bill is outlawing legal concealed carry on school grounds anyway. So the exemption would be moot.
                    Not quite. SB 707 attacks both CCW right to carry on campus and, separately, removes the CCW exemption for ammunition possession on campus (while retaining/adding exemptions to both 626.9 and 30310 for retired LE and retired reserve LE.)
                    Brandon Combs

                    I do not read private messages, and my inbox is usually full. If you need to reach me, please email me instead.

                    My comments are not the official position or a statement of any organization unless stated otherwise. My comments are not legal advice; if you want or need legal advice, hire a lawyer.

                    Comment

                    • #25
                      wildhawker
                      I need a LIFE!!
                      • Nov 2008
                      • 14150

                      Originally posted by randian
                      "Carrying ammunition onto school grounds."

                      Is a carry license an exemption to this, or is this a back-door anti-school-carry provision?
                      There is currently a carry license exemption to 30310. See https://www.firearmspolicy.org/wp-co...-2015-8-21.pdf and https://www.firearmspolicy.org/wp-co...-2015-8-21.pdf.

                      (Exemption at 30310(b)(5): "[This section shall not apply to....]A person holding a valid license to carry the firearm pursuant to Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 26150) of Division 5.")

                      -BC
                      Brandon Combs

                      I do not read private messages, and my inbox is usually full. If you need to reach me, please email me instead.

                      My comments are not the official position or a statement of any organization unless stated otherwise. My comments are not legal advice; if you want or need legal advice, hire a lawyer.

                      Comment

                      • #26
                        advocatusdiaboli
                        Calguns Addict
                        • Sep 2009
                        • 5521

                        Originally posted by wildhawker
                        Not quite. SB 707 attacks both CCW right to carry on campus and, separately, removes the CCW exemption for ammunition possession on campus (while retaining/adding exemptions to both 626.9 and 30310 for retired LE and retired reserve LE.)
                        'You da man' on legislation and I bow to your superior knowledge of such things, but writing as an inaccurate layman and cutting to the chase, the result for most citizens is as I said is it not? A concealed firearm with no ammunition is as pointless as...well, I cannot think of anything more pointless save our legislature.
                        Benefactor Life Member NRA, Life Member CRPA, CGN Contributor, US Army Veteran, Black Ribbon in Memoriam for the deceased 2nd Amendment
                        sigpic

                        Comment

                        • #27
                          wildhawker
                          I need a LIFE!!
                          • Nov 2008
                          • 14150

                          Originally posted by advocatusdiaboli
                          'You da man' on legislation and I bow to your superior knowledge of such things, but writing as an inaccurate layman and cutting to the chase, the result for most citizens is as I said is it not?
                          I didn't mean to be pedantic, just clarifying for the general audience.

                          The result of SB 707 is that tens of thousands of current CCW licensees -- and likely more than a million future licensees -- are screwed and might end up criminals.

                          The result of SB 347 is that otherwise law-abiding, good people will be banned from possessing guns for 10 years for non-violent, technical violations of [dumb and useless] laws.
                          Brandon Combs

                          I do not read private messages, and my inbox is usually full. If you need to reach me, please email me instead.

                          My comments are not the official position or a statement of any organization unless stated otherwise. My comments are not legal advice; if you want or need legal advice, hire a lawyer.

                          Comment

                          • #28
                            advocatusdiaboli
                            Calguns Addict
                            • Sep 2009
                            • 5521

                            Originally posted by wildhawker
                            I didn't mean to be pedantic, just clarifying for the general audience.

                            The result of SB 707 is that tens of thousands of current CCW licensees -- and likely more than a million future licensees -- are screwed and might end up criminals.

                            The result of SB 347 is that otherwise law-abiding, good people will be banned from possessing guns for 10 years for non-violent, technical violations of [dumb and useless] laws.
                            I put up with any hint of pendantry from you and a few others (like Gene H and the Librarian) because of the good work you all do and, more over, that fact that you are nearly always right and school me into humility. No offense taken. Today at least I can be ornery.
                            Last edited by advocatusdiaboli; 08-24-2015, 12:01 PM.
                            Benefactor Life Member NRA, Life Member CRPA, CGN Contributor, US Army Veteran, Black Ribbon in Memoriam for the deceased 2nd Amendment
                            sigpic

                            Comment

                            • #29
                              advocatusdiaboli
                              Calguns Addict
                              • Sep 2009
                              • 5521

                              I have to wonder if the penultimate anti-gun strategy is simply to make regulation of firearms and ammunition possession and use in California so labyrinthine, arcane, and draconian that few sane people even dare to risk it. And the insane are already prohibited persons. Q.E.D.
                              Benefactor Life Member NRA, Life Member CRPA, CGN Contributor, US Army Veteran, Black Ribbon in Memoriam for the deceased 2nd Amendment
                              sigpic

                              Comment

                              • #30
                                RobertMW
                                Senior Member
                                • Jul 2013
                                • 2117

                                Originally posted by advocatusdiaboli
                                I have to wonder if the penultimate anti-gun strategy is simply to make regulation of firearms and ammunition possession and use in California so labyrinthine, arcane, and draconian that few sane people even dare to risk it. And the insane are already prohibited persons. Q.E.D.
                                It's the best they could do, so they will keep marching towards that goal.
                                Originally posted by kcbrown
                                I'm most famous for my positive mental attitude.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1