Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

California should drop certified handgun roster

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #16
    Mayor McRifle
    Calguns Addict
    • Dec 2013
    • 7660

    Originally posted by Dr.Lou
    Yep, I am now one of Nevada's newest residents! Don't have much use for black rifles, but I think I'll go buy one just because I can. Perhaps I'll hang it above the fireplace as a reminder I am no longer in CA. I also enjoy a decent pay raise since they don't deduct state income tax from my retirement, my vehicle registration is a fraction of what it was in CA and sales tax is 1.5-2% lower. All this bragging is making me hungry, think I'll hit one of the free buffets before I go gun shopping. :-)
    No need to hang out and thread crap on a California firearms owners' internet forum then. Best of luck to you. Give them our regards on Nevguns.net.
    Last edited by Mayor McRifle; 02-17-2015, 6:20 AM.
    Anchors Aweigh

    sigpic

    Comment

    • #17
      Mayor McRifle
      Calguns Addict
      • Dec 2013
      • 7660

      Originally posted by ArchangelZeroSix
      An opinion piece that I caught in this morning's Daily News. Good read.

      It is the opinion of most California gun owners that the state government intends to eradicate private handgun ownership in the state by making handguns illegal, making handguns expensive or by mak…


      I must say though, the 'drop' in the title is a nice touch.
      Excellent op-ed piece. We need more of this. A lot more of this. We can no longer afford to sit back and allow the Antis to frame the issue. This is exactly the sort of thing we need to do to start turning the tide of public opinion. I think I'll write a letter to the editor today.
      Anchors Aweigh

      sigpic

      Comment

      • #18
        mif_slim
        I need a LIFE!!
        • Apr 2008
        • 10089

        Look at the comments... that's how libtards win. They didnt have to say a single word and gunowners are fighting against each other. So sad.
        Originally posted by Gottmituns
        It's not protecting the rights of the 1%, it's IMPOSING new laws because of the 1%.

        Comment

        • #19
          Jimi Jah
          I need a LIFE!!
          • Jan 2014
          • 17956

          People love to fight. Ever been to family reunion?

          Comment

          • #20
            AceGirlsHusband
            Veteran Member
            • Jan 2013
            • 2651

            Originally posted by mif_slim
            Look at the comments... that's how libtards win. They didnt have to say a single word and gunowners are fighting against each other. So sad.
            Yep. We will be our own undoing, eventually, and I have no idea how to fix that.

            Comment

            • #21
              Wiz-of-Awd
              Veteran Member
              • Jan 2012
              • 3556

              Originally posted by AceGirlsHusband
              Yep. We will be our own undoing, eventually, and I have no idea how to fix that.
              It can't really ever be fixed Ace.
              People are involved - 'tis the way of things.

              A.W.D.
              Seven. The answer is always seven.

              Comment

              • #22
                SuperSet
                Calguns Addict
                • Feb 2007
                • 9048

                Not sure if op-eds will do much nowadays as it seems all the movement, positive and otherwise, is happening in the courtroom (i.e. Pena).

                Comment

                • #23
                  ArchangelZeroSix
                  Junior Member
                  • Nov 2014
                  • 64

                  Originally posted by mif_slim
                  Look at the comments... that's how libtards win. They didnt have to say a single word and gunowners are fighting against each other. So sad.

                  The only diversion I saw was the California Right to Carry guy, who trolls every positive pro-gun LADN article. It looked like there was one anti, which he helped fuel by mentioning the 'evil' NRA.

                  I wouldn't exactly call that 'fighting', but sadly infighting is a common theme among this community, and your point is spot on.


                  Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

                  Comment

                  • #24
                    Sikvenum93
                    Senior Member
                    • Jul 2014
                    • 2181

                    How is our lawsuit against said roster going?
                    Wise men seldom speak. - Arcus

                    Comment

                    • #25
                      RobertMW
                      Senior Member
                      • Jul 2013
                      • 2117

                      Originally posted by Sikvenum93
                      How is our lawsuit against said roster going?
                      You'll find out in
                      Originally posted by kcbrown
                      I'm most famous for my positive mental attitude.

                      Comment

                      • #26
                        Sikvenum93
                        Senior Member
                        • Jul 2014
                        • 2181

                        Originally posted by RobertMW
                        You'll find out in
                        Thought that was the ten day waiting period.....
                        Wise men seldom speak. - Arcus

                        Comment

                        • #27
                          tumark2
                          Member
                          • Mar 2014
                          • 144

                          Originally posted by ArchangelZeroSix
                          An opinion piece that I caught in this morning's Daily News. Good read.

                          It is the opinion of most California gun owners that the state government intends to eradicate private handgun ownership in the state by making handguns illegal, making handguns expensive or by mak…


                          I must say though, the 'drop' in the title is a nice touch.
                          yes it is a well argued article.

                          one question: if the non roster handguns are truly unsafe, why is it LEO are allowed to buy "unsafe" handguns. isnt their job dangerous enough?

                          Comment

                          • #28
                            EM2
                            Veteran Member
                            • Jan 2008
                            • 4867

                            Originally posted by SonofWWIIDI
                            The roster is all about power to control the people, disarm the populace, and garner fees from the gun manufacturers to pay for it.

                            The Constitution has become toilet paper to politicians not only here in kommiefornia and other states, but our executive branch of the federal government as well.

                            THIS ^^^^



                            Originally posted by chris
                            it has nothing to do with safety or anything close to it. it is an incremental ban period. the author knew it when he wrote it.

                            and THIS ^^^^

                            Until people realize it is about money and control and not about "why don't they understand" we will not solve the problem.
                            The masses need to wake up and understand that there are evil people in this world hell bent on controlling others and all of the logic and reason in this world will not dissuade them from their goal.
                            "duck the femocrats" Originally posted by M76

                            If violent crime is to be curbed, it is only the intended victim who can do it. The felon does not fear the police, and he fears neither judge nor jury. Therefore what he must be taught to fear is his victim. Col. Jeff Cooper

                            Originally posted by SAN compnerd
                            It's the flu for crying out loud, just stop.

                            Comment

                            • #29
                              EM2
                              Veteran Member
                              • Jan 2008
                              • 4867

                              Originally posted by hedemark20
                              I'm still waiting for someone, anyone, to offer a reasoned, cogent explanation as to why a handgun, legal & safe to be sold in 48 other states, is magically unsafe because we happen to be in CA. That is impossible. The roster is the biggest, steaming pile of bull sh#t law ever. I despise it with every fiber of my being

                              chris just provided your explanation, are you awake yet?
                              "duck the femocrats" Originally posted by M76

                              If violent crime is to be curbed, it is only the intended victim who can do it. The felon does not fear the police, and he fears neither judge nor jury. Therefore what he must be taught to fear is his victim. Col. Jeff Cooper

                              Originally posted by SAN compnerd
                              It's the flu for crying out loud, just stop.

                              Comment

                              • #30
                                RobertMW
                                Senior Member
                                • Jul 2013
                                • 2117

                                Originally posted by Sikvenum93
                                Thought that was the ten day waiting period.....
                                It's the reality of pretty much every 2A rights case in country. Judges have been very slow about making their decisions for these cases, whether it is from procrastination, careful research, or fear of reprisal, we just don't know. Luckily, several cases have been kicking out recently, it seems that judges are getting the idea that the public needs to know where the 2A stands with regards to a myriad of different situations, post Heller and McDonald.

                                However, expect the cases out of California, DC, New York, New Jersey, and any other liberal stronghold to take the longest to go through the system. They have two things working against cases from them: those areas have very high population densities so more caseload in a given area which bogs down the courts, and they obviously also have the strongest protest from the public and politicians of the area. Even if a judge is a 2A supporter in those areas, they will have the most work to do in order to get a case through their courtroom.
                                Originally posted by kcbrown
                                I'm most famous for my positive mental attitude.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1