Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Peņa v. Cid (Handgun Roster) **CERT DENIED 6-15-2020**

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Colt
    Senior Member
    • Jul 2007
    • 1596

    So it includes the shoulder thing that goes up?

    Comment

    • CandG
      Spent $299 for this text!
      CGN Contributor - Lifetime
      • Apr 2014
      • 16970

      This just in: the 9th circuit has ruled that the state of California's list of "approved words that may be spoken", and the prison sentences for speaking off-list words, is definitely not a violation of the 1st amendment.
      Settle down, folks. The new "ghost gun" regulations probably don't do what you think they do.


      Comment

      • CandG
        Spent $299 for this text!
        CGN Contributor - Lifetime
        • Apr 2014
        • 16970

        Originally posted by Colt
        So it includes the shoulder thing that goes up?
        You're thinking of the assault weapon ban, not the handgun roster. The assault weapon ban is what prohibits shoulder things that go up.
        Settle down, folks. The new "ghost gun" regulations probably don't do what you think they do.


        Comment

        • pacrat
          I need a LIFE!!
          • May 2014
          • 10258



          2A rights have been incrementally denied by the legislature over several decades.

          In order to UNDO the 2A damage done over those decades. We as citizens must now INCREMENTALLY UNDO all that harm.

          It's not an all or nothing battle.

          Comment

          • ronlglock
            CGN/CGSSA Contributor
            CGN Contributor
            • May 2011
            • 2670


            Annnnndddddd this is why we keep losing. Need to donate FOR the win.


            Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
            sigpic

            NRA/USCCA/DOJ instructor, NRA CRSO, Journalist

            Comment

            • selfshrevident
              Senior Member
              • May 2011
              • 706

              Originally posted by wireless
              Re-listed is a good sign. They typically do not take a case without relisting it first.
              I forget, but was the NYSRPA case re-listed or did they take it on the first go? (srs question)

              Comment

              • HowardW56
                Calguns Addict
                • Aug 2003
                • 5901

                How are the lawsuits and appeals to be filed without funding?
                sigpic

                Comment

                • SantaCabinetguy
                  I need a LIFE!!
                  • Feb 2011
                  • 15137

                  Originally posted by selfshrevident
                  I forget, but was the NYSRPA case re-listed or did they take it on the first go? (srs question)
                  Distributed for conference twice:

                  Hauoli Makahiki Hou


                  -------

                  Comment

                  • selfshrevident
                    Senior Member
                    • May 2011
                    • 706

                    Originally posted by Ubermcoupe
                    Nice. I just remember back in the day seeing every significant 2A case get before the SCOTUS, only to be re-listed a dozen times before getting rejected. Those were disappointing times.

                    Comment

                    • taperxz
                      I need a LIFE!!
                      • Feb 2010
                      • 19395

                      Reverse and remand would be nice

                      Comment

                      • HowardW56
                        Calguns Addict
                        • Aug 2003
                        • 5901

                        Originally posted by selfshrevident
                        Nice. I just remember back in the day seeing every significant 2A case get before the SCOTUS, only to be re-listed a dozen times before getting rejected. Those were disappointing times.
                        That is possible this time too. SCOTUS receives hundreds upon hundreds of Cert Petitions, and grants a relative few...
                        sigpic

                        Comment

                        • HowardW56
                          Calguns Addict
                          • Aug 2003
                          • 5901

                          Originally posted by taperxz
                          Reverse and remand would be nice
                          GVR would be just fine, not that I think it is likely....
                          sigpic

                          Comment

                          • bruss01
                            Calguns Addict
                            • Feb 2006
                            • 5336

                            During all these re-listings, they are reminding each other of the case.

                            Don't think they don't think about these things, just the way you and I think about work issues even off the clock.

                            There are countless water-cooler conversations, remarks, aides talking among themselves and other subtle ways of the Justice's inclinations on a case leaking out. If they think they've got 5 votes for a decision they think they can live with... they may vote for the case to be heard. If the tendrils come back with "we've got four and a half, very mushy, lots of compromise required to get the fifth vote" - then it's a different story. Believe me, in that latter case, they're doing us a favor long term as well as the rest of the country and all our future descendants.

                            I'd prefer they turn the case down for hearing if, in order to get that 5th vote, they have to dilute it to the point of presenting a "Solomon's Solution" (cutting the baby in half to satisfy a parentage dispute). The real mother cries out "NO! Give her the baby." - preferring her child to be raised by a lying stranger than to be killed outright. If you care about the 2A, you'd cry out "NO!" on hearing a case where the decision might end up getting the 2nd Amendment neutered.
                            The one thing worse than defeat is surrender.

                            Comment

                            • meanspartan
                              Member
                              • Apr 2019
                              • 377

                              Being re-listed isn't really a "win" except that it wasn't denied right?

                              Every case that isn't denied, or granted cert, or remanded with instructions, gets re-listed, right?
                              sigpic

                              Comment

                              • taperxz
                                I need a LIFE!!
                                • Feb 2010
                                • 19395

                                Originally posted by HowardW56
                                GVR would be just fine, not that I think it is likely....
                                So, my reason for thinking this is possible is because it is a blatantly violation of Heller, (Dick Hellers gun could not be sold new in California) plus the Roster of Handguns is very unique to California

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1