Peņa v. Cid (Handgun Roster) **CERT DENIED 6-15-2020**

[CCWFacts]

Looking at the panel on this we have:

• Wallace (Nixon, please retire ASAP dude)
• Bybee (Bush)
• McKeown (Clinton)

Interestingly, 2/3 of the panel are MORMONS! Yes, right here in the 9th circuit, in a gun case, we got a panel with two Mormons appointed by Republicans. What are the odds?

I'm sure we will win at the panel level, 2-1. Really hope Wallace retires immediately after.

[Paladin]

Looking at the panel on this we have:
[LIST][*]Wallace (Nixon, please retire ASAP dude)
...
Really hope Wallace retires immediately after.

Wallace has already taken "senior" status. His "seat" on CA9 has been considered open since 1996....

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Senior_status

[Califpatriot]

Wallace has already taken "senior" status. His "seat" on CA9 has been considered open since 1996....
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Senior_status

Kim Wardlaw filled his seat when Clinton appointed her.

[wolfwood]

Well Wallace was the only disent in the CA mag case Duncan. I am pretty worried now in light of the fact a Clinton Dem upheld the injunction in Duncan and Wallace disented

[wolfwood]

I have just read the summary. Its a loss. I am to angry to deeply read the opinion. Everything else I can understand but the microstamping requirement? Come on

I hope a en bacn petition get filed just to kill time. Once that is denied hopefully Kavanaugh will be on the bench

http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2018/08/03/15-15449.pdf

[Rastoff]

Yes, it sounds like a 2-1 loss.

It's my opinion that all gun laws are a violation of the 2nd amendment. Having said that, in the context of the current way of interpreting things, they at least agreed with the concept that guns were still available that had chamber indicators and mag disconnects. However, they completely ignore the fact that not one single company makes a gun with micro-stamping.

This ruling just shows once again that the 9th circuit is not a law abiding entity and will do whatever they want regardless of what the law says. All of them should be removed and imprisoned for miscarriage of justice.

[CandG]

Hmm... Do you think SCOTUS would take this case? Being a pretty CA-specific law, I'm concerned that they'd pass.

What's next, en banc?

[Califpatriot]

Clifford Wallace is a huge disappointment.

[Califpatriot]

I have just read the summary. Its a loss. I am to angry to deeply read the opinion. Everything else I can understand but the microstamping requirement? Come on

I hope a en bacn petition get filed just to kill time. Once that is denied hopefully Kavanaugh will be on the bench


http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastor...3/15-15449.pdf

SCOTUS gives you 90 days to ask for cert. That takes us to early November. Kavanaugh should be confirmed by then, God willing.

[speedrrracer]

SCOTUS gives you 90 days to ask for cert. That takes us to early November. Kavanaugh should be confirmed by then, God willing.

Trying to find it now, just read yesterday they were anticipating an Oct 1 confirmation date, where the heck did I read that?

[mit31]

It was a recent Chuck Grassley interview:

"If we could get this all done by October 1 when the Supreme Court starts its new fall session it would be ideal, but I think we can get it done soon after that if we don't get it done by October the first," Grassley told Hewitt.

Trying to find it now, just read yesterday they were anticipating an Oct 1 confirmation date, where the heck did I read that?

[FABIO GETS GOOSED!!!]

I want two-tone, wah wah!

[kcbrown]

I want two-tone, wah wah!

[FABIO GETS GOOSED!!!]

The proof is in the pudding lol.

It would be nice to go on a trip down memory lane to read my original criticisms of this massive turd of a case, but they seem to have vanished into the ether unfortunately. This was a textbook example of what not to do, you could not have crafted this any more carefully to ensure a loss even if you tried.

[wolfwood]

The proof is in the pudding lol.

It would be nice to go on a trip down memory lane to read my original criticisms of this massive turd of a case, but they seem to have vanished into the ether unfortunately. This was a textbook example of what not to do, you could not have crafted this any more carefully to ensure a loss even if you tried.

You have to admit the microstamping requirement is pretty crazy though. It appears impossible to comply with. The 51 page disent lays out why it is unconstitutional better than I ever can.