Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Peņa v. Cid (Handgun Roster) **CERT DENIED 6-15-2020**

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • gryffinwings
    Member
    • Feb 2016
    • 377

    Originally posted by Librarian
    March of 2017 is not two years from September of 2017. Why CGF has not updated should be addressed to them directly.
    I just realized that this video is unavailable on youtube :/

    Comment

    • Burbur
      Senior Member
      • Sep 2010
      • 1258

      Perhaps they are anticipating microstamping getting tossed.

      I know I'll be in line for a 357 Coonan, hopefully they'll send me a couple.

      Comment

      • conquestking
        Junior Member
        • Jul 2012
        • 22

        Still waiting on this; all I want is a S&W 437, which as you can see, is one of the least offensive weapons out there. All it is is a black 637 but nope, apparently its too unsafe.

        Smith & Wesson J-Frame revolvers have had your back since 1950. These small revolvers were designed to fire a full power round and are as simple and easy to use as t

        Comment

        • TruOil
          Senior Member
          • Jul 2017
          • 1929

          I suspect that there have been no updates since nothing has happened. Although state courts are required to issue their decisions within 90 days of oral argument, no such rule applies in the federal court system. The Ninth is the busiest circuit in the nation, and thus decisions are rarely issued with any particular promptness. Plus, as I said above, it might be sitting on the case until the California Supreme Court decides the NSSF appeal, as a dismissal of that case as the State requests would be dispositive.

          Comment

          • abinsinia
            Veteran Member
            • Feb 2015
            • 4077

            Originally posted by TruOil
            I suspect that there have been no updates since nothing has happened. Although state courts are required to issue their decisions within 90 days of oral argument, no such rule applies in the federal court system. The Ninth is the busiest circuit in the nation, and thus decisions are rarely issued with any particular promptness. Plus, as I said above, it might be sitting on the case until the California Supreme Court decides the NSSF appeal, as a dismissal of that case as the State requests would be dispositive.
            I'm not sure how the NSSF case would effect this one. This case was very much argued as if that one didn't matter. Either way microstamping or no, the roster is an illegal gun ban.

            Comment

            • aBrowningfan
              Senior Member
              • Jan 2014
              • 1475

              Originally posted by conquestking
              Still waiting on this; all I want is a S&W 437, which as you can see, is one of the least offensive weapons out there. All it is is a black 637 but nope, apparently its too unsafe.

              https://www.budsgunshop.com/catalog/...P+1.8+COMBAT+5
              I would like to be able to purchase a Sig P225A1.... No high cap magazine, or anything that is otherwise objectionable other than that it is not on the list. Mechanical features on the P225A1 are what are on listed Sigs, but because the P225A1 is not 'listed', I can't purchase. Such a crock of s**t.

              Comment

              • numpty
                CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                CGN Contributor
                • Jul 2012
                • 2090

                Originally posted by aBrowningfan
                I would like to be able to purchase a Sig P225A1.... No high cap magazine, or anything that is otherwise objectionable other than that it is not on the list. Mechanical features on the P225A1 are what are on listed Sigs, but because the P225A1 is not 'listed', I can't purchase. Such a crock of s**t.
                Duh! It's not enough, not unsafe.
                The thief does not come except to steal, and to kill, and to destroy. I have come that they may have life, and that they may have it more abundantly.
                John 10:10


                iTrader: https://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/....php?t=1888351

                Comment

                • cire raeb
                  Senior Member
                  • Feb 2013
                  • 1049

                  Originally posted by numpty
                  Duh! It's not enough, not unsafe.


                  So say Gavin Newsom who might end up blowing his balls off.


                  Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

                  Comment

                  • LEAD LAUNCHER
                    Senior Member
                    • Oct 2013
                    • 1938

                    Originally posted by Paladin
                    My guess is we'll have a decision sometime between 2018 Jan 01 and Sept 01.
                    .............

                    Why the guess of this time period?


                    I'm honestly skeptical at this point that the roster will ever go away in my lifetime, and my 17 year old will almost certainly have got the hell out of Dodge before it's gone.

                    He's itchin' to escape this craphole and explore other states.


                    ..

                    Comment

                    • Paladin
                      I need a LIFE!!
                      • Dec 2005
                      • 12378

                      Originally posted by LEAD LAUNCHER
                      Why the guess of this time period?
                      Orals were back in March. My guess is 9 months to a year and a half after that is when the 3-judge panel will most likely release its decision.

                      Originally posted by LEAD LAUNCHER
                      I'm honestly skeptical at this point that the roster will ever go away in my lifetime, and my 17 year old will almost certainly have got the hell out of Dodge before it's gone.

                      He's itchin' to escape this craphole and explore other states.

                      ..
                      I know you didn't say I said we'd win, but I just want to make sure I did not give anyone that impression.
                      Last edited by Paladin; 10-29-2017, 8:31 PM.
                      240+ examples of CCWs Saving Lives.

                      Comment

                      • Junkie
                        Veteran Member
                        • Aug 2007
                        • 4848

                        Originally posted by conquestking
                        Still waiting on this; all I want is a S&W 437, which as you can see, is one of the least offensive weapons out there. All it is is a black 637 but nope, apparently its too unsafe.

                        https://www.budsgunshop.com/catalog/...P+1.8+COMBAT+5
                        There's no reason that S&W couldn't get that on the roster if they thought it was worth it.
                        Originally posted by aBrowningfan
                        I would like to be able to purchase a Sig P225A1.... No high cap magazine, or anything that is otherwise objectionable other than that it is not on the list. Mechanical features on the P225A1 are what are on listed Sigs, but because the P225A1 is not 'listed', I can't purchase. Such a crock of s**t.
                        What's so special about the P225A1? I picked up a P225 a while ago, don't think I spent all that much on it but I forget the exact amount. It's a good gun, but nothing that special IMO.
                        Originally posted by CSACANNONEER
                        A real live woman is more expensive than a fleshlight. Which would you rather have?

                        Comment

                        • Solidsnake87
                          Veteran Member
                          • Jun 2006
                          • 4399

                          Im surprised that there has been no activity on this in 7 months time.
                          Replying to craigslist for casual encounters is like pokemon with STDs. Gotta catch em all
                          If Hell ever needed a operations manual all it would need is a copy of California's laws
                          .

                          Comment

                          • JackRydden224
                            Calguns Addict
                            • Aug 2011
                            • 7224

                            9-12mo is my guess as well

                            Right now I'm holding off on all off roster purchase no matter how badly I want them. If we don't get anything by March 2018 I'll buy a few things.

                            Originally posted by Paladin
                            Orals were back in March. My guess is 9 months to a year and a half after that is when the 3-judge panel will most likely release its decision.

                            Comment

                            • JoelHugo1985
                              Junior Member
                              • Nov 2017
                              • 4

                              I really can't believe how long that these cases take to flush out. If it were taxes that you owed the Fed you would be in some pretty deep doo-doo for being late to pay, but since it's your freedoms, ya know...

                              Comment

                              • kemasa
                                I need a LIFE!!
                                • Jun 2005
                                • 10706

                                There is no incentive for the government to rush to do anything. If the law was put on hold until it was shown to be Constitutional by ALL the courts, then you would see a much different response.
                                Kemasa.
                                False signature edited by Paul: Banned from the FFL forum due to being rude and insulting. Doing this continues his abuse.

                                Don't tell someone to read the rules he wrote or tell him that he is wrong.

                                Never try to teach a pig to sing. You waste your time and you annoy the pig. - Robert A. Heinlein

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1