Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

CALGUNS FOUNDATION SUES LOS ANGELES COUNTY, SHERIFF LEE BACA (3/9/12)

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • choprzrul
    Calguns Addict
    • Oct 2009
    • 6535

    SLOSD requires it, ask me how I know....

    ....but since SLO county is the most corrupt county west of the Mississippi, who is really surprised?

    .

    Comment

    • zokoz
      Junior Member
      • Feb 2014
      • 31

      Originally posted by choprzrul
      SLOSD requires it, ask me how I know....

      ....but since SLO county is the most corrupt county west of the Mississippi, who is really surprised?

      .
      At least he gives CCWs. Santa Barbara will not give any unless you are apart of his private air force or a Supper Citizen of some sort. Santa Maria is just as bad. I can't wait for the elections and vote Bill Brown OUT!!! Chief from Santa Maria spent all of his law enforcement career in LA county... Surprise he doesn't give them out...

      Comment

      • ronlglock
        CGN/CGSSA Contributor
        CGN Contributor
        • May 2011
        • 2670

        Originally posted by Gray Peterson
        San Mateo requests it but as far as I've been told, they do not require it as of a month ago.

        If that's changed and you have an example, let me know.
        I went though my local PD and am sitting at about 45 days from my prints being pulled. Sgt Corpus left a VM for me asking if I heard anything from San Bruno - not sure what I am supposed to be hearing from them...
        sigpic

        NRA/USCCA/DOJ instructor, NRA CRSO, Journalist

        Comment

        • Paladin
          I need a LIFE!!
          • Dec 2005
          • 12382

          Originally posted by Paladin
          Originally posted by Paladin
          [1] Am I correct in assuming the appeals deadline has passed (6 weeks later now)?

          [2] Has LA appealed?
          Originally posted by CG of MP
          As of tonight the Merced County website STILL requires applicants to go through their local PD first. [3] By any chance can CGF put some pressure on them to do the right thing and follow the law as written?

          http://www.co.merced.ca.us/index.aspx?NID=1918
          Bump for answers to the 3 questions above....

          ...

          After all, acc to the stats Librarian got from CA9's FAQs page and put in post #14 of his locked Peruta 2nd A Litigation sticky, Peruta and/or Richards may be stuck in CA9 limbo for 2 more years! (and then after that, SCOTUS...) Why not attack on another front while we're waiting?
          Giving this another bump re. those 3 Qs I posed.
          Last edited by Paladin; 04-11-2014, 8:43 PM.
          240+ examples of CCWs Saving Lives.

          Comment

          • CG of MP
            Senior Member
            • Sep 2002
            • 681

            Merced County is a 'wobbler' liberal county with the UC there. The ROOTS of the county are however very conservative and most of the cops I have met there are very pro 2a.

            It would be really nice if the CGF or the NRA could put some time and effort into tipping Merced County into the virtual shall-issue camp. It is a logical next advancement.

            It borders Santa Clara and IMHO is the next logical step in the freedom advance toward SF.

            So what about it CGF/NRA any interest in another victory - one that would be a lot easier and would help to pave the way toward the real serious battles?

            Edited: Map deleted -4-13-14 - but the point still stands. Merced county stands out in a sea of other counties with vsi policies.
            Last edited by CG of MP; 04-13-2014, 8:28 AM.
            Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them.
            Miranda vs. Arizona
            The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes...
            District of Columbia vs. Heller
            sigpic

            Comment

            • jakep
              Junior Member
              • Sep 2013
              • 52

              Orange County and San Diego county need to be updated on that map.

              Comment

              • Paladin
                I need a LIFE!!
                • Dec 2005
                • 12382

                Originally posted by CG of MP
                Where'd you dig up that ol' map?

                It is now seriously out of date.

                Solano pretty much has accepted self-defense as GC for about a year (IOW light green).

                San Joaquin now officially accepts self-defense as GC (IOW dark green).

                Riverside, acc to what it says on its .pdf policy, does NOT issue because of fear or for convenience (i.e., for SD) (IOW yellow at best).

                Ventura is now like Orange is: accepting SD as GC, but may switch back if Peruta is shot down (IOW both dark green for now)

                Then we have San Mateo, Santa Clara, and San Diego which are all taking apps w/SD = GC, but are holding them pending the order being issued in Peruta.

                Bottom line: best not to post that map anymore lest you confuse folks about what's what.
                Last edited by Paladin; 04-13-2014, 8:56 AM.
                240+ examples of CCWs Saving Lives.

                Comment

                • CG of MP
                  Senior Member
                  • Sep 2002
                  • 681

                  Edited orig post.
                  Deleted the old map.

                  Spent 20 min looking for an updated map - but I do not see that there is one anyplace.

                  My original premise is even more valid however with the changes you describe. Merced County, an arguably rural county stands out like a sore thumb and would be the next logical place to get VSI challenged. (Not counting Yolo as Baker is in progress.)
                  Last edited by CG of MP; 04-13-2014, 8:49 AM.
                  Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them.
                  Miranda vs. Arizona
                  The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes...
                  District of Columbia vs. Heller
                  sigpic

                  Comment

                  • Paladin
                    I need a LIFE!!
                    • Dec 2005
                    • 12382

                    Originally posted by CG of MP
                    Edited orig post.
                    Deleted the old map.
                    I'm leaving my copy up since I've got updated info re. it in the same post -- they make sense together, not separately.

                    Originally posted by CG of MP
                    Spent 20 min looking for an updated map - but I do not see that there is one anyplace.
                    Several months ago I contacted the person who made & updated that map and they said they're not updating it anymore and so removed it from where they were hosting it.

                    Originally posted by CG of MP
                    My original premise is even more valid however with the changes you describe. Merced County, an arguably rural county stands out like a sore thumb and would be the next logical place to get VSI challenged. (Not counting Yolo as Baker Richards is in progress.)
                    Fixed it for you.
                    Merced will stand out even more if Peruta is finalized as law since Santa Clara (as well as San Mateo and San Diego), has said they'll accept SD as GC at that time and (like those other 2), are accepting and holding apps w/SD as GC until that time. Among those 3, that will be another 4.5M Californians liberated!
                    240+ examples of CCWs Saving Lives.

                    Comment

                    • Warrior King
                      Senior Member
                      • Jan 2011
                      • 828

                      Originally posted by Harrison_Bergeron
                      If he still gets to decide what constitutes a good cause, then what does a win here accomplish?
                      Not much but getting the Sheriff to at least follow the existing law should mean later he will need to follow other laws and rulings which is what the Sheriff of Orange County was forced to do after Peruta.

                      It is disgusting that they have that much contempt for the public that they cant even respect the existing laws and regulations.
                      sigpic

                      Comment

                      • taperxz
                        I need a LIFE!!
                        • Feb 2010
                        • 19395

                        Originally posted by Paladin
                        Where'd you dig up that ol' map?

                        It is now seriously out of date.

                        Solano pretty much has accepted self-defense as GC for about a year (IOW light green).

                        San Joaquin now officially accepts self-defense as GC (IOW dark green).

                        Riverside, acc to what it says on its .pdf policy, does NOT issue because of fear or for convenience (i.e., for SD) (IOW yellow at best).

                        Ventura is now like Orange is: accepting SD as GC, but may switch back if Peruta is shot down (IOW both dark green for now)

                        Then we have San Mateo, Santa Clara, and San Diego which are all taking apps w/SD = GC, but are holding them pending the order being issued in Peruta.

                        Bottom line: best not to post that map anymore lest you confuse folks about what's what.
                        San Mateo will issue for a reasonable good cause. If you want to only use "self defense" as a good cause, they will hold the application.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        UA-8071174-1