NAGR v. San Jose [ORAL Arguments set for , see post #134]

[abinsinia]

I think it's possible the judge grants the motion to dismiss, she's corrupt and it's clear from the PI that she's not going to decide based on Bruen.

[curtisfong]

I think it's possible the judge grants the motion to dismiss, she's corrupt and it's clear from the PI that she's not going to decide based on Bruen.

Beth Freeman (who doesn't deserve the title "Judge") clearly thinks NSRPA v Bruen isn't binding, because her personal bias takes precedent over law.

Given this, it is likely she will copy/paste the order as is, unmodified.

Beth thinks that is her job.

[opw678w]

Since I posted this comment, I did the Real ID application. With an appointment, and pre-approved documents, I was in and out of the DMV in 8 minutes.

Imagine a PPT/DROS, which uses the same documents, being completed that fast.

Yeah, that was blind luck! I did the same thing and had a much different result. I walked into the DMV with not one but two VALID (non-REAL) drivers licenses to get my REAL ID. Had all my stuff in order for an address I've been at for 25 years. The lady takes my stuff, validates it and tell me to go over and get in line for a photo and a test. A TEST? (WTF?). I had a valid license through 2026. Nobody could figure it out. A hour later I had a new drivers license.

Just yesterday I go it to get a smog waiver (since my son has the car away at school) and none of them had seen a smog waiver form before. How dumb can they be? And of course none of them are allowed to give you stickers anymore, that has to come from "inventory" which is an altogether different window. Another 90min.

[Silence Dogood]

STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to extend time to respond to motion to dismiss, to vacate dates and to set a case management conference filed by National Association for Gun Rights, Inc., Mark Sikes, City of San Jose, Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Graham, Jeremiah) (Filed on 2/28/2023) Modified on 3/1/2023 (cjl, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 02/28/2023)

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.391018/gov.uscourts.cand.391018.100.0.pdf

[Silence Dogood]

ORDER GRANTING 100 STIPULATION RE MOTION TO DISMISS BRIEFING AND CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 3/1/2023. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2023) (Entered: 03/01/2023)

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.391018/gov.uscourts.cand.391018.101.0.pdf

[abinsinia]

OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re 95 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Consolidated Second Amended Complaint Under Rules 12(b) and 12(b)(6) ) HJTA's Opposition to City's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint filed byGeorge Arrington, James Barry, Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, Silicon Valley Public Accountability Foundation, Silicon Valley Taxpayers Association, Inc.. (Bittle, Timothy) (Filed on 3/16/2023) (Entered: 03/16/2023)

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.391018/gov.uscourts.cand.391018.102.0.pdf

[abinsinia]

OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re 95 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Consolidated Second Amended Complaint Under Rules 12(b) and 12(b)(6) ) filed byNational Association for Gun Rights, Inc., Mark Sikes. (Dhillon, Harmeet) (Filed on 3/16/2023) (Entered: 03/16/2023)

From the docket. This is a second opposition brief from NARG. The first one in post #81 is from the tax association. It appears they were allowed two different briefs.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.391018/gov.uscourts.cand.391018.103.0.pdf

[abinsinia]

REPLY (re 95 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Consolidated Second Amended Complaint Under Rules 12(b) and 12(b)(6) ) filed byCity Of San Jose, City of San Jose City Council, Jennifer Maguire. (Prevost, Tamarah) (Filed on 3/30/2023) (Entered: 03/30/2023)

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.391018/gov.uscourts.cand.391018.104.0.pdf

[rational_behavior]

1) Did I read this right -- are the defendants seriously arguing that because the city of San Jose is not YET impounding firearms and levying fines for non-payment of the tax, that the plaintiffs don't have standing?
2) Why do so many of these court documents have multiple font styles and weights?

[Silence Dogood]

STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to continue hearing on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF # 95) filed by National Association for Gun Rights, Inc., Mark Sikes. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Graham, Jeremiah) (Filed on 4/14/2023) (Entered: 04/14/2023)

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.391018/gov.uscourts.cand.391018.105.0.pdf

[Silence Dogood]

Two more months. Just pushing back the next hearing “currently set for June 15, 2023, at 9:00 a.m. be continued to August 24, 2023, at 9:00 am.”

[abinsinia]

ORDER DENYING 105 REQUEST TO CONTINUE HEARING AND VACATING HEARING. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 4/17/2023. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2023) (Entered: 04/17/2023)

Hmmm. I feel a ripple in the force .. I think the judge is going to dismiss.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.391018/gov.uscourts.cand.391018.106.0.pdf

[librarian72]

Beth Freeman (who doesn't deserve the title "Judge") clearly thinks NSRPA v Bruen isn't binding, because her personal bias takes precedent over law.

Given this, it is likely she will copy/paste the order as is, unmodified.

Beth thinks that is her job.

Straight from her official bio:

https://cand.uscourts.gov/judges/freeman-beth-l-blf/

Appointed by Obama, 2014. Judges appointed in Obamas second term, prior to Republican takeover of the senate are more biased than any group I could have ever imagined.

if we are lucky she will copy paste the order as is.

[cz74]

Hmmm. I feel a ripple in the force .. I think the judge is going to dismiss.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/re...1018.106.0.pdf

So the judge is likely to agree with the defendant's (City of San Jose) motion to dismiss without hearing further oral arguments?

[abinsinia]

So the judge is likely to agree with the defendant's (City of San Jose) motion to dismiss without hearing further oral arguments?

It seems likely, but who knows I'm just guessing.