Nguyen vs Becerra 2020-Dec: USDC SDCA: challenge new 1 in 30

[TruOil]

It's addressed in the following entries,

Entry #4
Entry #9
Entry #46

#4 stay requested, #9 stay was granted, #46 stay reversed.

My keyboard has developed an aversion to typing 5s, 6s, 7s and 8s. That should have been Entry 46. With no stay in place, the 1 in 30 rule is presently unenforceable.

[Elgatodeacero]

9th Circuit strikes down 1-30 gun rationing law.

https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2025/06/20/24-2036.pdf

[abinsinia]

now we wait for the inevitable En Banc request.

[Elgatodeacero]

Probably, but I predict the request for en banc hearing will be denied.

[abinsinia]

The opinion also makes AB-1078 (i.e. 3 guns a month) illegal. The opinion never says anything other than "multiple guns". I think it also makes 1-in-30 on PPT illegal.

[garand1945]

Big win. We continue to chip away at gun bans. Too slowly but we still can celebrate this. Kudos to all who made this possible.

[Sputnik]

Probably, but I predict the request for en banc hearing will be denied.

But that’ll ruin their “perfect� record on the 2nd. Can they live with that?

[Dvrjon]

The opinion also makes AB-1078 (i.e. 3 guns a month) illegal. The opinion never says anything other than "multiple guns". I think it also makes 1-in-30 on PPT illegal.

I agree…from the ruling.

IMG_0817.jpg

IMG_0548.jpg

“Metering� the exercise of constitutional rights and the lack of a cousin for the 1-in-30. I doubt they’ll find traction for en banc or for the 3-in-30.

[The Gleam]

Essentially, this could also kill the restriction of the number of PPT sales per year of being limited to 6 as it resembles the same common perspective. Hoping it does.

So long as it's law-abiding, what difference does it make.

I realize there is an impression on the limitation of sales by frequency as to not also be considered a dealer buying and flipping guns in high volume, regarding the way ATF sees it, however, if it took me 40 years to accumulate 400 firearms, and I'm in my early 80s, with maybe 5 to 10 years to live, how could I ever legally sell them within that time without resorting to someone else having their hand in the pot? (an auction house, gun store, etc.).

---

[ProfChaos]

https://youtu.be/pMNry2ylyJ0

[riderr]

\
I realize there is an impression on the limitation of sales by frequency as to not also be considered a dealer buying and flipping guns in high volume, regarding the way ATF sees it,

If you could run PPT in the shady parking lot with no papers, the limitation hawks could probably bring it up. However, you transfer the guns through FFL, with all the necessary (and not) background checks, paperwork, fees, etc. What difference does it make if you have your own FFL license or not? That doesn't make any sense to me, really.
Why in the hell I can't sell my own property without the government hassle?

[The Gleam]

If you could run PPT in the shady parking lot with no papers, the limitation hawks could probably bring it up. However, you transfer the guns through FFL, with all the necessary (and not) background checks, paperwork, fees, etc. What difference does it make if you have your own FFL license or not? That doesn't make any sense to me, really.
Why in the hell I can't sell my own property without the government hassle?

I agree - but THAT is NEVER going to materialize in California, so it's a wasted talking point. Focusing on what is as is when fighting such bills at hand requires staying within that as is frame.

---

[The Gleam]

The opinion also makes AB-1078 (i.e. 3 guns a month) illegal. The opinion never says anything other than "multiple guns". I think it also makes 1-in-30 on PPT illegal.

The fact that they are trying to put forth a 3-gun per month concession as an alternative to the 1-gun per month tyranny, proves they full well know that any such limit has no merit, for any reason they concoct, and guts their arguments entirely.

Goldilocks nonsense.

Whether I buy 1, 3, or 30 guns per month implies nothing about criminality, application, intention, or use any different than the fact I have 9 cars, and 2 of which I bought in the same month as each other - with a perfect driving record and no accidents in over 25 years. Haven't used any to rob a liquor store or intentionally run down any anti-ICE obstuctionists and insurectionists... yet.

If I buy 5 gallons of gas or 50 gallons of gas at the same stop, I only need a pint of gas to burn down a school or make a Molotov cocktail - so are they going to limit me to 1 pint of gas a month?

The justifications were always outrageous stupidity.


----