Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

2019 Fouts/Tolentino v Becerra: 10-17-22 Vacated and Remanded

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Sputnik
    Senior Member
    • May 2011
    • 2120

    They took their time with the Rhode appeal, too. They know the 9th has their back so no big hurry.

    Comment

    • abinsinia
      Veteran Member
      • Feb 2015
      • 4124

      Originally posted by Sputnik
      They took their time with the Rhode appeal, too. They know the 9th has their back so no big hurry.
      But meanwhile we have billy club freedom. They must not think this is a very dangerous ruling.

      Comment

      • AlmostHeaven
        Veteran Member
        • Apr 2023
        • 3808

        Originally posted by abinsinia
        But meanwhile we have billy club freedom. They must not think this is a very dangerous ruling.
        Even the California DOJ brief only argues that billy clubs cause "unwarranted injuries," instead of advancing the usual rhetoric about saving lives.
        A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

        The Second Amendment makes us citizens, not subjects. All other enumerated rights are meaningless without gun rights.

        Comment

        • EM2
          Calguns Addict
          • Jan 2008
          • 5005

          Am I understanding this correctly?
          Looks like Judge Benitez stayed his judgement.


          I do not have an account and am not buying one, so I am just going off what the summary says.
          Timeline as best I can determine, most current on top:
          Feb-28-2024 - order to stay89 signed by Judge Benitez
          Feb-27-2024 - a joint motion to stay is filed
          Feb-26-2024 - bonta appeals
          Feb-23-2024 - Judge decision, cannot enforce 22210 as it applies to a billy.
          "duck the femocrats" Originally posted by M76

          If violent crime is to be curbed, it is only the intended victim who can do it. The felon does not fear the police, and he fears neither judge nor jury. Therefore what he must be taught to fear is his victim. Col. Jeff Cooper

          Originally posted by SAN compnerd
          It's the flu for crying out loud, just stop.

          Comment

          • abinsinia
            Veteran Member
            • Feb 2015
            • 4124

            Originally posted by EM2
            Am I understanding this correctly?
            Looks like Judge Benitez stayed his judgement.


            I do not have an account and am not buying one, so I am just going off what the summary says.
            Timeline as best I can determine, most current on top:
            Feb-28-2024 - order to stay89 signed by Judge Benitez
            Feb-27-2024 - a joint motion to stay is filed
            Feb-26-2024 - bonta appeals
            Feb-23-2024 - Judge decision, cannot enforce 22210 as it applies to a billy.
            No. It's a response to docket entry 89,

            Joint MOTION to Stay attorney fees motion by Russell Fouts, Tan Miguel Tolentino. (Beck, Alan)

            He stayed something related to attorney's fees.

            Comment

            • EM2
              Calguns Addict
              • Jan 2008
              • 5005

              Originally posted by abinsinia
              No. It's a response to docket entry 89,

              Joint MOTION to Stay attorney fees motion by Russell Fouts, Tan Miguel Tolentino. (Beck, Alan)

              He stayed something related to attorney's fees.
              OK, that makes sense.

              So, as far as we know the ruling stands, a billy is now legal in CA.
              "duck the femocrats" Originally posted by M76

              If violent crime is to be curbed, it is only the intended victim who can do it. The felon does not fear the police, and he fears neither judge nor jury. Therefore what he must be taught to fear is his victim. Col. Jeff Cooper

              Originally posted by SAN compnerd
              It's the flu for crying out loud, just stop.

              Comment

              • MajorSideburns
                Senior Member
                • May 2013
                • 1596

                Does an expanding baton qualify as a billy? Are they legal too?

                Comment

                • abinsinia
                  Veteran Member
                  • Feb 2015
                  • 4124

                  Originally posted by EM2
                  OK, that makes sense.

                  So, as far as we know the ruling stands, a billy is now legal in CA.
                  As far as I know right now.

                  Comment

                  • nosuchagency
                    Senior Member
                    • Jan 2008
                    • 1113

                    jack pointed this out a few posts up - state's appeal specifically identifies asp batons being included in the section of law that was struck down. that's about as straight forward as it gets...

                    however, from personal perspective, a separate point to bear in mind (especially as batons were previously a wobbler); because Judge didn't include language in his injunction ordering state to notify all lea's of decision, it would seem prudent to keep a copy of injunction on phone for duration of case.
                    Last edited by nosuchagency; 03-02-2024, 5:56 PM.
                    Originally posted by Graybeard
                    Seriously the quality of some of the posts on here has gone waaaaayyyyyy down
                    Originally posted by cannon
                    You have not been here long enough to see how low they can really go.

                    Comment

                    • AlmostHeaven
                      Veteran Member
                      • Apr 2023
                      • 3808

                      Originally posted by nosuchagency
                      jack pointed this out a few posts up - state's appeal specifically identifies asp batons being included in the section of law that was struck down. that's about as straight forward as it gets...

                      however, from personal perspective, a separate point to bear in mind (especially as batons were previously a wobbler); because Judge didn't include language in his injunction ordering state to notify all lea's of decision, it would seem prudent to keep a copy of injunction on phone for duration of case.
                      I wonder why Judge Benitez failed to include such a provision. He did so in Rhode v. Bonta quite recently.
                      A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

                      The Second Amendment makes us citizens, not subjects. All other enumerated rights are meaningless without gun rights.

                      Comment

                      • wolfwood
                        Senior Member
                        • Mar 2012
                        • 1371

                        The Freedom Fighters Foundation is hosting a class to help raise money to pay for the costs of the appeal. The class is in San Diego. Please email them if you are interested in attending for the precise location


                        You are invited to attend our Fundamentals of Low Light / No Light Shooting Techniques Fundraiser. Saturday March 30, 2024, 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.

                        Freedom Fighters Foundation is hosting the fundraiser to support Alan Alexander Beck, an attorney dedicated to fighting for your Second Amendment Rights. Alan has become a rising star in the Second Amendment Community with two recent wins.

                        In February Alan won a case in front of Federal District Judge Benitez regarding a ban on "Billy Clubs" in California Fouts v. Bonta.

                        In August of last year Alan took a case Teter v. Lopez to the 9th Circuit Court and a three judge panel ruled unanimously that the butterfly knife ban in the State of Hawaii was unconstitutional.

                        Politicians have been eroding your rights incrementally over many years. Now we have to do the same and win them back one case at a time. The State of California is appealing Judge Benitez' decision to the 9th Circuit Court. Freedom Fighters Foundation believes Alan has a very good chance of winning this case and we are asking for your your support to help Alan. Filing cases at the 9th Circuit Court cost time and money with court fees, travel, and accommodations.

                        We would like to raise $5,000 to assist Alan with his fight for your Rights. If you would like help this cause, we are hosting the Low Light / No Light fundraiser. If you cannot attend the course but would like to contribute, please donate below.



                        Fundamentals of Low-Light / No-Light Shooting
                        Description:
                        Featuring the proper use of hand-held and weapon-mounted lighting systems. Limited to no more than 25 participants.

                        Skills Covered:
                        Firearms safety rules review.
                        Physiology of the human eye and natural night vision.
                        Use of weapon mounted flashlights.
                        Use of hand held flashlights.
                        Threat identification and target discrimination.
                        Tactical concepts of operating in low light conditions.
                        One hand shooting while deploying a flashlight.
                        Threat assessment and area scanning.
                        Movement off the line of force and lateral displacement.
                        Dominating the weapon, threat and visual areas.
                        Engagement and displacement drills.
                        "He who controls the light shall control the darkness!"

                        Equipment Requirements:
                        Bring whatever you got:
                        Carbine, rifle, shotgun or pistol
                        Weapon-mounted or handheld flashlights
                        Holsters and slings encouraged but not required
                        Lasers and red dots if you got 'em
                        Ballistic Eye Protection (non-tinted lenses for night use)
                        Ear Protection
                        Spare Magazines
                        Mag Pouches or shell carriers for pistol, rifle or shotgun
                        Sufficient Batteries for all your equipment
                        Seasonally appropriate clothing suited to strenuous activity (no shorts, sandals, etc)
                        Rain gear / cold weather gear (seasonal)
                        Snacks, Energy Drinks, etc.
                        200 rounds of ammo per firearm

                        Goals:
                        Increase your knowledge and experience in low light / no light shooting situations.
                        Encourage proficient low-light weapons handling skills and safety.
                        This 3-hour event will be held on Saturday, March 30, 2024, from 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.
                        A $100 tax deductible donation to Freedom Fighters Foundation is requested.
                        If you would like to attend this event, reply to this email with your confirmation and contact info. Contributions can be made here or for more information please send an e-mail to: info@freedomfightersfoundation.org

                        Let Freedom Ring
                        Last edited by wolfwood; 03-16-2024, 10:17 AM.

                        Comment

                        • Drivedabizness
                          Veteran Member
                          • Dec 2009
                          • 2610

                          Where is the class, Counselor?
                          Proud CGN Contributor
                          USMC Pistol Team Alumni - Distinguished Pistol Shot
                          Owner of multiple Constitutionally protected tools

                          Comment

                          • wolfwood
                            Senior Member
                            • Mar 2012
                            • 1371

                            Originally posted by Drivedabizness
                            Where is the class, Counselor?
                            The class is in San Diego. Please email them if you are interested in attending for the precise location

                            Comment

                            • Rickybillegas
                              Senior Member
                              • Nov 2022
                              • 1537

                              The problem is if you buy one now (legally) then if the injunction is reversed (a likely possibility), your extendable baton is no longer carriable.

                              Unlike the high capacity magazine ban, if you bought it when it was legal, you can carry it. But with the baton, not. You gotta wait for a final positive judgement if and when that ever occurs.

                              I'd like to get one, but hesitate for that reason.

                              I like Benitez illustration of the little girl in the ghetto.

                              Comment

                              • AlmostHeaven
                                Veteran Member
                                • Apr 2023
                                • 3808

                                Originally posted by Rickybillegas
                                The problem is if you buy one now (legally) then if the injunction is reversed (a likely possibility), your extendable baton is no longer carriable.

                                Unlike the high capacity magazine ban, if you bought it when it was legal, you can carry it. But with the baton, not. You gotta wait for a final positive judgement if and when that ever occurs.

                                I'd like to get one, but hesitate for that reason.

                                I like Benitez illustration of the little girl in the ghetto.
                                I find it absurd that the State of California insists on defending the ban on possessing extendable batons, even for concealed weapons licenseholders, but of course, arms control laws never make any sense.
                                A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

                                The Second Amendment makes us citizens, not subjects. All other enumerated rights are meaningless without gun rights.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1