Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Miller v. Bonta 9th Ckt "assault weapons": Held for Duncan result 1-26-24

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • flyer898
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2009
    • 2014

    Originally posted by abinsinia
    The AWB covers some handguns, for example ones with threaded barrels.
    Yes, like the Whitney Woverine.
    Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference. So said somebody but not Mark Twain
    "One argues to a judge, one does not argue with a judge." Me
    "Never argue unless you are getting paid." CDAA
    "I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it." George Bernard Shaw

    Comment

    • Drivedabizness
      Veteran Member
      • Dec 2009
      • 2610

      My hope is that when Judge Benitez writes his opinion he does so in very clear language, destroying the State's ridiculous arguments one by one.
      Proud CGN Contributor
      USMC Pistol Team Alumni - Distinguished Pistol Shot
      Owner of multiple Constitutionally protected tools

      Comment

      • Bhobbs
        I need a LIFE!!
        • Feb 2009
        • 11848

        Comment

        • BAJ475
          Calguns Addict
          • Jul 2014
          • 5066

          I agree. Force the 9th to grant a stay.

          Comment

          • SpudmanWP
            CGN/CGSSA Contributor
            CGN Contributor
            • Jul 2017
            • 1156

            He only did that the 1st time because of the proclivity of the 9th to use the 2-step test. That is no longer an option, especially given the GVRs in Duncan and Bianchi.

            Comment

            • Bhobbs
              I need a LIFE!!
              • Feb 2009
              • 11848

              Originally posted by SpudmanWP
              He only did that the 1st time because of the proclivity of the 9th to use the 2-step test. That is no longer an option, especially given the GVRs in Duncan and Bianchi.
              It's always an option. Some judge used the two step analysis in a recent case. There really is no consequence to them using it.

              Comment

              • SpudmanWP
                CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                CGN Contributor
                • Jul 2017
                • 1156

                Originally posted by Bhobbs
                It's always an option. Some judge used the two step analysis in a recent case. There really is no consequence to them using it.
                They can try, but that will just make overturning it even easier.

                Comment

                • chris
                  I need a LIFE!!
                  • Apr 2006
                  • 19447

                  Originally posted by Bhobbs
                  It's always an option. Some judge used the two step analysis in a recent case. There really is no consequence to them using it.
                  He chose to ignore the NYSPRA ruling. As Spudman said it will be easier to overturn.
                  http://govnews.ca.gov/gov39mail/mail.php
                  sigpic
                  Thank your neighbor and fellow gun owners for passing Prop 63. For that gun control is a winning legislative agenda.
                  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6Dj8tdSC1A
                  contact the governor
                  https://govnews.ca.gov/gov39mail/mail.php
                  In Memory of Spc Torres May 5th 2006 al-Hillah, Iraq. I will miss you my friend.
                  NRA Life Member.

                  Comment

                  • Bhobbs
                    I need a LIFE!!
                    • Feb 2009
                    • 11848

                    It took 14 years for SCOTUS to overturn the two step analysis.

                    Comment

                    • SpudmanWP
                      CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                      CGN Contributor
                      • Jul 2017
                      • 1156

                      They have weighed in on the 2nd Circuits BS treatment of the stay so they have already put the Circuits on notice that they are watching.

                      The process takes time to work its way through the steps.

                      Comment

                      • robertfchew
                        Member
                        • Apr 2018
                        • 263

                        Originally posted by SpudmanWP
                        They have weighed in on the 2nd Circuits BS treatment of the stay so they have already put the Circuits on notice that they are watching.

                        The process takes time to work its way through the steps.

                        Where exactly are we at with this? I had surgery earlier this week so not really paying attention

                        Comment

                        • Sgt Raven
                          Veteran Member
                          • Dec 2005
                          • 3806

                          Originally posted by Bhobbs
                          It took 14 years for SCOTUS to overturn the two step analysis.

                          Maybe Trump appointing 3 new Justices had something to do with ending the delays. The Bruen 5 know some of them are getting up there in age, so they may have a short window to rule on these cases. They know Roberts is Squishy and could vote either way.
                          sigpic
                          DILLIGAF
                          "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity, but don't rule out malice"
                          "Once is Happenstance, Twice is Coincidence, Thrice is Enemy Action"
                          "The flak is always heaviest, when you're over the target"

                          Comment

                          • Sgt Raven
                            Veteran Member
                            • Dec 2005
                            • 3806

                            Originally posted by robertfchew
                            Where exactly are we at with this? I had surgery earlier this week so not really paying attention

                            IIRC, Monday is the end of the 30+30+10 day period, but is a holiday. So it moves to Tuesday. Then we have to wait for Judge Benitez to write his opinion.
                            sigpic
                            DILLIGAF
                            "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity, but don't rule out malice"
                            "Once is Happenstance, Twice is Coincidence, Thrice is Enemy Action"
                            "The flak is always heaviest, when you're over the target"

                            Comment

                            • NorCalBusa
                              Senior Member
                              • Dec 2006
                              • 1497

                              Originally posted by robertfchew
                              Where exactly are we at with this? I had surgery earlier this week so not really paying attention
                              You haven't missed anything substantive, just us in the peanut gallery kibitzing...
                              If you don't know where you are going, any road will take you there

                              Comment

                              • Bhobbs
                                I need a LIFE!!
                                • Feb 2009
                                • 11848

                                Watching is irrelevant. The circuits will respond when there are consequences.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1