Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Miller v. Bonta 9th Ckt "assault weapons": Held for Duncan result 1-26-24

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • newbieLA
    Senior Member
    • Jul 2018
    • 575

    How long after the trail date should we expect Judge Benitez to deliver his ruling?

    Comment

    • CGZ
      Senior Member
      • Nov 2014
      • 990

      Originally posted by newbieLA
      How long after the trail date should we expect Judge Benitez to deliver his ruling?
      I would wager it taking no longer than one month.

      Comment

      • bwiese
        I need a LIFE!!
        • Oct 2005
        • 27616

        Originally posted by BAJ475
        Wonder if they will be able to get their convictions reversed on Habeas after the AW ban is declared unconstitutional?
        I will note at least several of these individuals were also convicted of mfg,
        possibly multiple counts - not just simple AW possession. Esp the dudes
        at gun show(s) doing on video - assembly/disassembly cycles.

        Only simple AW possession (and likely single count) treatable as wobbler.

        In theory an illegal AW possessor charged/convicted of felony AW possession:
        • and having an otherwise clean record;
        • including being 'clean' from time of conviction onward;
        • after some time
        • with agreement from (or at least lack of opposition) from DA office;
        ... can apply for a "17(b)" motion to re-sentence to misdemeanor which
        then allows full civil rights recovery.

        This is also assuming that at original trial defense tried to go for an AB2728 resolition (nuisance charge, $300 fine and surrender of gun).

        Bill Wiese
        San Jose, CA

        CGF Board Member / NRA Benefactor Life Member / CRPA life member
        sigpic
        No postings of mine here, unless otherwise specifically noted, are
        to be construed as formal or informal positions of the Calguns.Net
        ownership, The Calguns Foundation, Inc. ("CGF"), the NRA, or my
        employer. No posts of mine on Calguns are to be construed as
        legal advice, which can only be given by a lawyer.

        Comment

        • newbieLA
          Senior Member
          • Jul 2018
          • 575

          Originally posted by CGZ
          I would wager it taking no longer than one month.
          good! and a permanent injunction to go along with the ruling would make it a truly happy new year

          Comment

          • homelessdude
            CGN/CGSSA Contributor
            CGN Contributor
            • Aug 2013
            • 2053

            It's only permanent until it gets to the 9th for appeal. Thats where the real fun and GAMES start. JMO

            Comment

            • JiuJitsu
              Member
              • Dec 2020
              • 345

              Comment

              • ritter
                Senior Member
                • May 2011
                • 805

                You're entirely correct, IMHO. With luck, we can then appeal that stay to SCOTUS who might say "take as much time as you like, but enjoined during that time period." Might being the key word.

                Comment

                • newbieLA
                  Senior Member
                  • Jul 2018
                  • 575

                  Originally posted by homelessdude
                  It's only permanent until it gets to the 9th for appeal. Thats where the real fun and GAMES start. JMO
                  unfortunately I think you're right. Even though an emergency stay by the 9th is supposed to be "rare and unusual"

                  Comment

                  • curtisfong
                    Calguns Addict
                    • Jan 2009
                    • 6893

                    Originally posted by newbieLA
                    unfortunately I think you're right. Even though an emergency stay by the 9th is supposed to be "rare and unusual"
                    As "rare" as an en banc....
                    The Rifle on the WallKamala Harris

                    Lawyers and their Stockholm Syndrome

                    Comment

                    • Sputnik
                      Senior Member
                      • May 2011
                      • 2105

                      Does anyone know the percentages for non-2A en bancs? I feel like my view point is likely skewed because I really only follow 2A cases but en banc is obviously not the exception in these cases (because guns).

                      Comment

                      • abinsinia
                        Veteran Member
                        • Feb 2015
                        • 4069

                        Originally posted by Sputnik
                        Does anyone know the percentages for non-2A en bancs? I feel like my view point is likely skewed because I really only follow 2A cases but en banc is obviously not the exception in these cases (because guns).
                        I looked at the En Banc cases once, and besides 2A cases the other cases (or some of them) were immigration cases where the En Banc was used to prevent a deportation or something like that.

                        Comment

                        • newbieLA
                          Senior Member
                          • Jul 2018
                          • 575

                          Originally posted by abinsinia
                          I looked at the En Banc cases once, and besides 2A cases the other cases (or some of them) were immigration cases where the En Banc was used to prevent a deportation or something like that.
                          so pretty much all politically motivated

                          Comment

                          • abinsinia
                            Veteran Member
                            • Feb 2015
                            • 4069

                            Originally posted by newbieLA
                            so pretty much all politically motivated
                            Yeah, that's what I thought at time.

                            Comment

                            • abinsinia
                              Veteran Member
                              • Feb 2015
                              • 4069

                              NOTICE of Appearance by Kevin James Kelly on behalf of Xavier Becerra (Kelly, Kevin)Attorney Kevin James Kelly added to party Xavier Becerra(pty:dft) (Entered: 11/30/2022)
                              Bonta is changing attorneys. This Kevin James Kelly has also been assigned to the Duncan case.

                              Comment

                              • bwiese
                                I need a LIFE!!
                                • Oct 2005
                                • 27616

                                Originally posted by abinsinia
                                Bonta is changing attorneys. This Kevin James Kelly has also been assigned to the Duncan case.
                                This may or may not have terrible significance; DOJ is a large agency with state employees entering into holiday season. Many other fairly ordinary staff scheduling/reallocation activities may occur as well.

                                Bill Wiese
                                San Jose, CA

                                CGF Board Member / NRA Benefactor Life Member / CRPA life member
                                sigpic
                                No postings of mine here, unless otherwise specifically noted, are
                                to be construed as formal or informal positions of the Calguns.Net
                                ownership, The Calguns Foundation, Inc. ("CGF"), the NRA, or my
                                employer. No posts of mine on Calguns are to be construed as
                                legal advice, which can only be given by a lawyer.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1