Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Young v. Hawaii (CA9); Dismissed with predjudice 12-16-22

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MarCat
    Member
    • Feb 2013
    • 138

    I definitely care and appreciate you both. It was a great article, and I am damn proud there are Americans like you that step up and keep fighting. Just outstanding.

    Thank you, sir.

    Comment

    • CCWFacts
      Calguns Addict
      • May 2007
      • 6168

      Originally posted by wolfwood
      here is a fuller body picture of George in full uniform. George is the real deal. He spent 21 years in the infantry. I also included a picture of his counsel wearing a younger man's uniform
      A lifetime of service to America in uniform and out. Thank you both!
      "Weakness is provocative."
      Senator Tom Cotton, president in 2024

      Victoria "Tori" Rose Smith's life mattered.

      Comment

      • Paladin
        I need a LIFE!!
        • Dec 2005
        • 12374

        Originally posted by wolfwood
        here is a fuller body picture of George in full uniform. George is the real deal. He spent 21 years in the infantry. I also included a picture of his counsel wearing a younger man's uniform
        Ranger and Marine!

        Go get 'em!
        240+ examples of CCWs Saving Lives.

        Comment

        • Robotron2k84
          Senior Member
          • Sep 2017
          • 2013

          State of Hawaii's motion to intervene and requesting en banc hearing:

          Comment

          • SPGuy
            Member
            • May 2011
            • 145

            I guess it’s time to start getting ready for the Supreme Court Mr Beck

            Comment

            • Robotron2k84
              Senior Member
              • Sep 2017
              • 2013

              Hawaii is acting in their own self-interest, but is far from the only anti player on the board. This could still be denied to limit fallout should it be appealed to SCOTUS on en banc reversal.

              Denying the motion wound alllow for permitted open-carry, where an en banc reversal and appeal to SCOTUS could open permit-less constitutional open-carry.
              Last edited by Robotron2k84; 08-19-2018, 3:17 PM.

              Comment

              • Chewy65
                Calguns Addict
                • Dec 2013
                • 5026

                Is this the standard way the game is being played. As in Peruta, the state declines to participate until a panel holds state law invalid. Then it cries that it has to be allowed to appeal en banc to defend state law, since the county is not an agency of the state.

                Comment

                • Peaceful John
                  Member
                  • Apr 2008
                  • 312

                  Originally posted by Robotron2k84
                  Denying the motion wound alllow for permitted open-carry, where an en banc reversal and appeal to SCOTUS could open permit-less constitutional open-carry.
                  Layman here, requesting clarification. Does this mean that if en banc ratifies Young, the entire 9th Circuit will become permitted open-carry?

                  But if en banc rules against Young and SCOTUS ratifies, then all of America becomes constitutional open-carry?

                  Comment

                  • Robotron2k84
                    Senior Member
                    • Sep 2017
                    • 2013

                    Reading tea leaves is not a scientific endeavor. However, should the motion be denied or en banc convened and uphold the panel's findings, it would solidify the opinion to where Nichols could proceed. It would then be up to the 9th, CA appeal, en banc cycle again to settle Nichols. If Nichols is upheld at the ninth, then CA would be compelled to find some avenue to permit open carry (loaded?).

                    That would have to go through the legislative process and may not adhere to any ruling in Nichols, where another round of lawsuits would ensue. It could take another 5-6 years post-Young, in the best case, to get California to comply.

                    As for SCOTUS, if any of these cases are appealed and granted cert., it could very well lead to shall-issue or permit-less open-carry based on their interpretation of how 2A and 10A interact. Or, they could simply uphold whatever finding the 9th produced.

                    The other unknown is how SCOTUS might grant a case cert. in order to overcome any circuit splits should CA9 reverse the panel's decision.

                    There are no certainties, it's all game theory at this point.

                    Comment

                    • sfpcservice
                      Senior Member
                      • Jan 2009
                      • 1879

                      Originally posted by Robotron2k84
                      State of Hawaii's motion to intervene and requesting en banc hearing:

                      http://michellawyers.com/wp-content/...28-USC_138.pdf
                      Cool, lets go to scotus.
                      sigpic


                      John 14:6

                      Comment

                      • homelessdude
                        CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                        CGN Contributor
                        • Aug 2013
                        • 2056

                        Does anyone know anything about Neal Kumar Katyal from the Washington DC law firm named in the motion It appears the state went and got some help. Does that firm have any history of gun rights cases?

                        Comment

                        • Robotron2k84
                          Senior Member
                          • Sep 2017
                          • 2013



                          Obama solicitor general, has argued numerous SCOTUS cases, including Obamacare, general Dem crusader and clerked for Roberts before he became Chief Justice. Nothing good for our side, it would appear.

                          Comment

                          • homelessdude
                            CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                            CGN Contributor
                            • Aug 2013
                            • 2056

                            Thanks

                            Comment

                            • SPGuy
                              Member
                              • May 2011
                              • 145

                              I know worst case scenario and game theory can be fun to play as well as keeping hopes down/realistic...However sometimes I feel like the anti-2A groups look at eachother when they get into a pickle and say, “How do we get the f—- out of this? You know what let’s go over to Cal Guns and see what they come up with, they might even give us a better idea and they will do the homework for us. Hell we could even copy the argument word for word!!”
                              Last edited by SPGuy; 08-20-2018, 7:57 AM.

                              Comment

                              • Drivedabizness
                                Veteran Member
                                • Dec 2009
                                • 2610

                                Originally posted by wolfwood
                                here is a fuller body picture of George in full uniform. George is the real deal. He spent 21 years in the infantry. I also included a picture of his counsel wearing a younger man's uniform
                                Semper Fi, Counselor!
                                Proud CGN Contributor
                                USMC Pistol Team Alumni - Distinguished Pistol Shot
                                Owner of multiple Constitutionally protected tools

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1