The Urban Survival Chick - Official Website

[kaligaran]

That question was skirted, I agree.

Now address womens place on the front line - and skip the white-wash. Oh, that was my question. You still haven't directly addressed it.

I really am looking forward to hear an honest reply why women think they need to stand a battle line?

Thoughts?

I never said that I think women should stand on the battle line or not.
Nor do I wish to get into that as it's OT material and beat to death.

Why are you trying to force that discussion and how is that relevant the 'Urban Survival Chicks' site?

[sdkevin]

.. ya know what..

Why do I care? You will never go to war (I don't mean pretend keyboard stuff), your "war" is SF.

A very tough challenge.

[speedrrracer]

Because Zimmerman was white, racist, and a member of a militia? Fail. The only part you got right was that he's a male.

Read it slowly, and maybe, just maybe, you'll have a chance at comprehending. I doubt it, but it's really your only chance

she'd.be.dismissed.as != ( she is | he is )

That should keep you busy for a few years

[madoka]

The OP posted a link to a site. Then some people start talking about women in the military or in combat. How are those two things connected at all?

What I have learned in a short amount of time is that if problemchild and sdkevin are not the same guy posting with two accounts, then they are soul mates.

[bigguns85]

Sure a 110 lb gal isn't going to hump a squad LMG but neither is a 110 lb guy either.

Thats my brothers weight and guess what that was his weapon when he was in. He's also 6'2 and pure muscle.

Women have less muscle mass period its just how they were designed. They dont produce large amount of testotrone which build muscles. If I have a choice between a man or a woman to fight besides me I would chose a man as he can drag or carry my ***** out of trouble good luck with a woman that aint on roids. I never said women should be in the military I just said they shouldnt fight in it. Sure women can shoot just as well as men if trained but that is not what qualifys someone to fight in the military its alot more physicaly demanding besides being able to shoot straight. but this is all beating a dead horse as I stated before because of the liberals agenda its considred sexist even though its basic to how women are built lol

[82fb]

Thats my brothers weight and guess what that was his weapon when he was in. He's also 6'2 and pure muscle.

6'2"
110 lbs
pure muscle


Pick any two, but definitely all not three...

[bigguns85]

6'2"
110 lbs
pure muscle

Pick any two, but definitely all not three...

lol he has almost no body fat. When he was in boot camp they had him on tripple rations to try to bulk him up. Ofcourse he gained weight like 10 or 15 pounds but it was pure muscle. He has a very high metabolism its just how hes built, so I pick all 3 lol

[bob7122]

To those who say women should not fight in war.. I point out that they serve in many armies already and do just fine. Most modern weapon systems do not need brawn or fast reflexes to use and firefights mostly see both sides firing in the general direction of the enemy..rarely actually sighting in on someone in some sort of fast drawn encounter. Where women may be at a disadvantage is in close range combat..clearing rooms and what not..still if they can pass the training they can do the job.

serving and actually hold a combat MOS are two different things.

and cool site, i'll pass it on to my female coworkers.

[Sonic_mike]

Welp I know how imma spend my Saturday night now.




Reading her beautiful blog of course.

[section31]

http://loadoutroom.com/2456/women-to-play-in-the-nfl/

Pirates have seized the thread. I join them.