Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
BODY ARMOR: The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly
Collapse
X
-
Out of all the things that are wrong with our country they choose to go after body armor.... -
Wouldn't outlawing possession by those law abiding citizens amount to an unconstitutional "taking" by the government that would require compensation?
I don't know if I have a problem with anyone unable to own a firearm also being prohibited from owning body armor. Outlawing felons from possession won't stop posession but will give prosecutors another charge /enhancement when trying to put filth away in our permissive criminal justice system.
This proposed legislation is arbitrary and unlawful under the public law.Leave a comment:
-
Mike, there's concealable, and then there's "concealable." Until such time as we get ballistic roll-on, there will always be an issue with the necessary thickness required for center fire rifle rounds. The most concealable rifle plate carrier I have seen is the older DBT low-vis carrier. I would give them a call and see if they still have them available. They are BALCS soft armor compatible, which will take care of the side-wrap.Leave a comment:
-
Are any of the concealable plate carriers actually concealable? I like look like I got my hockey pads on under my shirt with my current carrier. Looking for one ideally that holds side plates as well. Doesn't help I'm 240lbs.Leave a comment:
-
I don't know if I have a problem with anyone unable to own a firearm also being prohibited from owning body armor. Outlawing felons from possession won't stop posession but will give prosecutors another charge /enhancement when trying to put filth away in our permissive criminal justice system.Leave a comment:
-
Leave a comment:
-
Great thread! Lots of good info...
To make sure I understand, the general rule of thought is:
All around set-up:
Carrier with plates, backers and spall mitigation - can be worn with with just backers or complete
Plates - L3,L3+,L4 depending on need and desire
- materials, steels, ceramics and UHMWPE all good with pro/cons for each
- Line-X coating on steel plates (as example) works as spall mitigation along as well as corrosion (to be used in conjuction with additional spall mitigation such as backers)
Backers - L3A (best option)
- Materials - avoid all except woven aramids (kevlar etc)
Am I missing anything - on the basic level? Is this something that would be good and versatile for nearly all situations as it is adaptable?
Last question - backers ran alone - just as effective as soft armor vest (given same level pro?)
The best choice for an all-around use is a low profile overt carrier (that can be concealed if need be without pouches) utilizing a plate such as the FM-STX and soft armor backers/cummerbunds. Soft armor backers are just as effective as full-size vest panels when worn alone.Leave a comment:
-
Great thread! Lots of good info...
To make sure I understand, the general rule of thought is:
All around set-up:
Carrier with plates, backers and spall mitigation - can be worn with with just backers or complete
Plates - L3,L3+,L4 depending on need and desire
- materials, steels, ceramics and UHMWPE all good with pro/cons for each
- Line-X coating on steel plates (as example) works as spall mitigation along as well as corrosion (to be used in conjuction with additional spall mitigation such as backers)
Backers - L3A (best option)
- Materials - avoid all except woven aramids (kevlar etc)
Am I missing anything - on the basic level? Is this something that would be good and versatile for nearly all situations as it is adaptable?
Last question - backers ran alone - just as effective as soft armor vest (given same level pro?)Leave a comment:
-
The goal of this bill is to stop all armor that is able to defeat "law enforcement ammunition." I will ignore WTF is law enforcement ammunition, and stay on point. LVL IIIA is able to stop just about every pistol round there is. Most Law enforcement uses 9mm, and everything in current production can stop that. Even IIA (the worst armor in regards to stopping power) can stop 40s and 45ACP.
So... what is the point of this bill again?Last edited by arslin; 08-08-2014, 4:02 PM.Leave a comment:
-
This article doesn't cover any technical details regarding armor, but it does touch on the potential future legality of it.
Leave a comment:
-
Guy I know is offering to sell a set of velocity systems ULV plates for $600. This seems to be too good of a deal. Any issues with them? They're steel so it's not like they can be broken right?Leave a comment:
-
-
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,854,845
Posts: 25,000,078
Members: 353,086
Active Members: 5,839
Welcome to our newest member, kylejimenez932.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 15214 users online. 73 members and 15141 guests.
Most users ever online was 65,177 at 7:20 PM on 09-21-2024.
Leave a comment: