Two things about all that.
I think it was Carl Sagan who said, "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." Homes get broken into all the time, it's a very common event. If you claim to witness such an event it may or may not be true, but based on the sheer known quantity of break ins your story would certainly be plausible and worthy of investigation. The story told by the Oathkeepers was both shallow (lacking in detail) and fairly extraordinary, and wasn't worth more than casual consideration in my mind. Extraordinary events do happen, and to be considered credible they require more than "Hey man, my cousin Billy-Bob saw X and X doing X." At least that's how I try to weed out the potential BS.
Second, any organization that makes bold accusations against the government, and uses those accusations to garner support, should feel a moral responsibility to do their best to pass on true things and weed out false things. Obviously, the Oathkeepers didn't did that. Glad they owned up to it.
We have enough "real" reasons to be unhappy about the state of our government, we don't need made-up reasons thrown into the mix just to stir the pot.
I think it was Carl Sagan who said, "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." Homes get broken into all the time, it's a very common event. If you claim to witness such an event it may or may not be true, but based on the sheer known quantity of break ins your story would certainly be plausible and worthy of investigation. The story told by the Oathkeepers was both shallow (lacking in detail) and fairly extraordinary, and wasn't worth more than casual consideration in my mind. Extraordinary events do happen, and to be considered credible they require more than "Hey man, my cousin Billy-Bob saw X and X doing X." At least that's how I try to weed out the potential BS.
Second, any organization that makes bold accusations against the government, and uses those accusations to garner support, should feel a moral responsibility to do their best to pass on true things and weed out false things. Obviously, the Oathkeepers didn't did that. Glad they owned up to it.
We have enough "real" reasons to be unhappy about the state of our government, we don't need made-up reasons thrown into the mix just to stir the pot.
Comment