Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

80% polymer reviews

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mitch1
    Member
    • Aug 2016
    • 421

    80% polymer reviews

    I have built Ar lowers out of aluminum and wanted to try out polymers.
    I like the polymer products that I use in my everyday work so I first tried out the 80% Glock.
    I am very happy with it and so far it seems to be holding up.

    Alright so for this month I ordered and received a Polymer 80 , Genesis 80, and a EP Armory lower. Next month I will review the Tennessee Arms and James Madison lowers.
    I am not a professional but I am very mechanically inclined. I am using a tabletop drill press and mostly common tools. I also use some uncommon tools like fixed reamers, dial calipers, depth micrometers , and a x-y vise. Really the only necessities are the drill press and the x-y vise.

    I will list what I liked and what I don't like, these are just my opinions.

    First up is the EP Armory lower. It is very inexpensive($29), it uses stickers in place of jigs and it does not include mill or drill bits. The magazine well is nicely beveled and it will accept magpul gen3 mags along with everything else I have. I milled this in a little over an hour. I tapped the grip hole even though it is not recommended. It was drilled all the way thru so you can use a trigger adjuster. The trigger guard is fixed and is large enough to use with gloves. The sidewalls are not flimsy but they are also not reinforced. I used a standard mil-spec lower parts kit and everything fit and functioned well.
    Bottom line, yes I would buy another.

    Next is the Polymer80 Phoenix. It is also very reasonably priced($59), comes with a very good one time use jig, and includes all the mill and drill bits. The magazine well is beveled and all my magazines fit. Again it took me a little over an hour to mill this. The grip is held on with a square nut in a recess so you cannot use a trigger adjuster.The trigger guard is fixed and is large enough to use with gloves.The sidewalls are reinforced all the way from front to back and it feels extremely sturdy. I used a standard mil-spec lower parts kit with the exception of the bolt release pin. Polymer 80 gives you a pin and setscrew instead of the roll pin. Again everything fit and functioned well.
    Bottom line, Yes I would buy another and so far it would be my first pick.

    Next is the Genesis 80%. It is reasonably priced($59), comes with a good one time use jig, and includes the mill and drill bits. The magazine well is beveled but will not accept the magpul gen 3 magazines. This is because the trigger guard is oversized. I was initially pleased with the brass inserts for the buffer tube and grip but upon inspection the grip screw is like a 8-32 instead of the mil std 1/4-28. Also you cannot use a trigger adjuster with this receiver. I was going to use a mil-spec lower parts kit but I am unable to complete this lower. The bottom of the trigger pocket is hollow and the floor is less than 1/16" thick after milling to 1.25". I understand that things can go wrong with injection molding and this one is just not useable. Next problem is the bolt catch pin. The supplied pin is a 3/32" pin that is threaded on the end. If they had used rolled threads instead of cut threads it would be great. instead we have a pin that has smaller diameter threads than the body. Totally useless. Next is customer service. I have emailed and telephoned the manufacturer with no response after two weeks.
    Bottom line, No I would not buy another and I would not suggest anyone else buy either

    I have mated the EP Armory and Polymer 80 to standard ar uppers, both fit well, no problems. The Genesis lower misses the rear takedown hole by .025". I have run 20 mags thru the EP Armory and Polymer 80 and I have seen no problems.
    As a afterthought I did change both of these to non rotating pins, this was done for my convenience.
    Last edited by mitch1; 09-04-2016, 9:34 PM. Reason: additions
  • #2
    edgerly779
    CGN/CGSSA Contributor
    CGN Contributor
    • Aug 2009
    • 19871

    How to legally engrave a polymer lower is the question. Looks like a metal plate must be imbedded properly to accept the engraving. Anyone have more info on this. I won't touch one myself.

    Comment

    • #3
      TMB 1
      Calguns Addict
      • Dec 2012
      • 7153

      Originally posted by edgerly779
      How to legally engrave a polymer lower is the question. Looks like a metal plate must be imbedded properly to accept the engraving. Anyone have more info on this. I won't touch one myself.
      Why does it have to have a metal plate imbedded if it didn't originally have one?
      sigpic

      Comment

      • #4
        92greenyj
        Member
        • Dec 2011
        • 96

        Originally posted by edgerly779
        How to legally engrave a polymer lower is the question. Looks like a metal plate must be imbedded properly to accept the engraving. Anyone have more info on this. I won't touch one myself.
        Same way you would a metal lower? Hell it should be easier since it's a softer material. I was thinking the letter/number punch kit from harbor freight should get it done no problem.
        Household Arsenal:
        Mossberg 500 .410, Mossberg 500 12 gauge (2 of em), Mossberg 100 ATR .270 caliber, Armalite AR-7 .22lr, Savage 93 .17HMR, Marlin Lever Action Colt 45 rifle, Beretta revolver 45 Colt, Ruger P90T in 45 ACP
        Smith & Wesson 22A

        Comment

        • #5
          JAE
          Member
          • Nov 2013
          • 267

          Originally posted by TMB 1
          Why does it have to have a metal plate imbedded if it didn't originally have one?
          It's what all other manufacturers have been forced to do when selling 100% lowers so it's the accepted way of serializing them. If there's an alternate method that's legal I'd like to hear about it. Not sure what's going to happen to all the home built polymer lowers and pistol frames if the laws go through. No more polymer in Kalifornia? Give them up like the magazines? Bunch of nonsense. One step closer to Oregon....

          Comment

          • #6
            mnichols
            Veteran Member
            • Jul 2013
            • 2625

            Info here for new firearm identification requirements :

            https://www.activejunky.com/invite/132380
            Mr.Rebates sign-up referral link: http://www.mrrebates.com?refid=1034188

            Comment

            • #7
              mitch1
              Member
              • Aug 2016
              • 421

              This review is for the Tennessee 80% lower.
              This one was the highest price, retail $109 with jig and bits. The magazine well is beveled and will accept all my mags. I do not like how much slop there is in the mag release button area. I mean the button sits at a slight angle and is clunky , not smooth. Lower parts fit and work well, the overall thickness of the receiver is less than the other receivers. I am using K and S pins and I had to shorten them by .04 and I had to add a plastic shim for the safety selector. The uppers I have all fit and they fit very snug. The sidewalls do not have reinforcements but it does feel pretty strong, no flex. The polymer/plastic milled very nicely and it felt just like the polymer 80 material. The other nice things about this, brass buffer tube and pistol grip screw inserts, nice stops and safe/fire markings for the safety selector and the integral trigger guard is well designed. If you wanted to use a trigger stop you cant because the grip screw insert is not open and I would not want to try drilling thru the brass.

              Bottom line, the slop in the mag release is too much as is. I will most likely jb weld and file to fit. Overall It is nice but I recommend the polymer 80 first, the Ep armory second, the TN Arms third, and Genesis not at all.
              Next month I will review the James Madison reciever

              Also a thank you to oldaudionerd for sending me his 80%

              Comment

              • #8
                edgerly779
                CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                CGN Contributor
                • Aug 2009
                • 19871

                I am talking about legal engraving per atf not for ca regs. polymer 80% lowers no way to engrave. waste of money.

                Comment

                • #9
                  mitch1
                  Member
                  • Aug 2016
                  • 421

                  Update, the Tennessee upper is not working out for me. The upper receiver lug fits very tightly in the lower(the manufacturer says this is on purpose). I had to sand down the reliever lug pocket on the left side for clearance when I noticed the pocket for the takedown pin retainer (right side)is cracked and paper thin. Another for the scrap pile. I will contact TN arms and see what they
                  have to say.

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    OldAudioNerd
                    Member
                    • Feb 2016
                    • 130

                    Sorry to hear the Tennessee lower didn't work out for you. I was really hoping they'd be a nice option

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      greensoup
                      Senior Member
                      • Jun 2014
                      • 737

                      Sounds like we need to find a permanent adhesive or epoxy that only releases under heat and a material for a plate that is pry resistant.

                      I'd assume that if you uses locktite with fasteners and epoxy to attach a small metal plate you'd essentially destroy a polymer lower getting it off.

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        mitch1
                        Member
                        • Aug 2016
                        • 421

                        This review is for the James Madison 80%.
                        I like it, the polymer material mills very nicely, magazine fit is good.
                        It was as expensive as the Genesis and that was a POS.
                        Overall, I would buy another if I needed one and if the polymer 80 was not available.
                        As for the TNarms lower I talked to ttheir service rep and they asked me to send it in for them to inspect.
                        I will send it in and hopefully the replacement will be better.

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          bigcim
                          Junior Member
                          • Jun 2009
                          • 27

                          Thank you for sharing your findings.

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            mitch1
                            Member
                            • Aug 2016
                            • 421

                            Update:
                            Well I received another one today, same problem. Takedown pin retaining hole is to close to the inside.
                            I spoke with TN arms and they told me that they are retooling their mold because of this problem.
                            They sent me a replacement with no new jig, I asked why when on their own website it clearly states it is a one time use, Answer :TS
                            The new mold will not be ready until the second or third quarter of this year.
                            I asked if they are still sending the bad ones out and of course they are.
                            I am on the waiting list for the revised product
                            I stand by my original findings,
                            Polymer80 ,pretty good
                            Ep armory, not bad
                            Genesis, POS
                            TN ARMS, POS
                            Last edited by mitch1; 01-03-2017, 1:53 PM. Reason: typo

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              edgerly779
                              CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                              CGN Contributor
                              • Aug 2009
                              • 19871

                              Must embed 3.7 ounce stainless plate permanently for engraving. No one knows how to do that. Stay away from 80% polymers.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1