I disliked the .40 for quite a while. Shot one one time and thought it was too snappy. One big advantage though is that the ammo is incredibly plentiful, so that is a big advantage.
I think its easy to see how the .40 has a leg up on the 9. The 9 will shoot a 147gr bullet at just under 1000 ft a second, and the 40 will shoot a 180 gr bullet around 1000 ft a second.
I decided to give the 40 another chance. I bought a Glock 22 and shot it last night. The 180 gr loads were actually very comfortable. The 155 and 165 definitely performed to the 'snappy' description of the cartridge. The 180 gr load is not only quite manageable to shoot, but I think its an excellent HD/SD option.
9mm will always be more comfortable to shoot, but the .40 allows you a heavier, wider bullet, traveling a bit quicker.
That being said, I definitely would not feel undergunned with a 9
I think its easy to see how the .40 has a leg up on the 9. The 9 will shoot a 147gr bullet at just under 1000 ft a second, and the 40 will shoot a 180 gr bullet around 1000 ft a second.
I decided to give the 40 another chance. I bought a Glock 22 and shot it last night. The 180 gr loads were actually very comfortable. The 155 and 165 definitely performed to the 'snappy' description of the cartridge. The 180 gr load is not only quite manageable to shoot, but I think its an excellent HD/SD option.
9mm will always be more comfortable to shoot, but the .40 allows you a heavier, wider bullet, traveling a bit quicker.
That being said, I definitely would not feel undergunned with a 9




Comment