I bought a Redding Dual Ring sizer for my .45ACP loads. The concept of a "no compromise" sizing die really appealed to me. I load mixed headstamps, some with vastly different brass thickness. I thought the Redding DS should allow me to load these mixed headstamps with more consistent results.
I do like the die, but in fact, it too is just a compromise. In fact, the fixed dual rings actually deliver less adjustability and for instance mine will not sufficiently size thinner brass like Remington enough to load .451" jacketed with proper neck tension.
Frankly the $100+ price tag for the Redding DR sizer would be better spent in other areas for most loaders.
I think for most people loading straight walled handgun, using sizer die brands that err on the smaller size, while resulting in more "coke bottle" shapes, will at least ensure you are getting sufficient neck tension across the spectrum of once fired brass you may be using to make you happy.
Sorry for the hijack, just thought people should get one person's opinion of a very expensive die.
I do like the die, but in fact, it too is just a compromise. In fact, the fixed dual rings actually deliver less adjustability and for instance mine will not sufficiently size thinner brass like Remington enough to load .451" jacketed with proper neck tension.
Frankly the $100+ price tag for the Redding DR sizer would be better spent in other areas for most loaders.
I think for most people loading straight walled handgun, using sizer die brands that err on the smaller size, while resulting in more "coke bottle" shapes, will at least ensure you are getting sufficient neck tension across the spectrum of once fired brass you may be using to make you happy.
Sorry for the hijack, just thought people should get one person's opinion of a very expensive die.

Comment