Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Help Identify Ammo

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #16
    jimbo74
    Veteran Member
    • Mar 2014
    • 2923

    No, this is new stuff. I have over 300 rds of this for sure. I bought it within the last couple years, from either PSA, or a similar company. This is not ammo that was Fuego Centro whatever from 50 years ago.
    "It is currently CA legal to modify a double-action revolver into a single-action revolver and modify a single-action revolver into a double-action revolver.

    CA DOJ BOF stance on modifying handguns only applies to dimensionally compliant bolt-action single-shot pistols and dimensionally compliant break-open single-shot pistols.
    ^It does not apply to revolvers, manually operated repeating pistols, and semi-auto pistols." ~~ Quiet

    Comment

    • #17
      Mayor McRifle
      Calguns Addict
      • Dec 2013
      • 7765

      It looks like it was manufactured in 2015.
      Anchors Aweigh

      sigpic

      Comment

      • #18
        SVT-40
        I need a LIFE!!
        • Jan 2008
        • 12907

        Ammo made in 1975 isn't really that old. It will be fine to shoot.
        Poke'm with a stick!


        Originally posted by fiddletown
        What you believe and what is true in real life in the real world aren't necessarily the same thing. And what you believe doesn't change what is true in real life in the real world.

        Comment

        • #19
          kcheung2
          Veteran Member
          • Aug 2012
          • 4387

          Originally posted by pacrat
          The short and quick of the tell is the DATE stamp. Commercial 223 has none. Just as commercial pistol and other rifle calibers don't. Like 9mm and 308.

          Mil-surp is dated.

          The crimped primer is also a semi tell. But some commercial ammo is crimped. So not a definitive indicator.
          Also the red sealant. That's typical of military ammo. And it will be either 55, 62, or 77 grains. You can pretty much rule out 77 grains because Mk262 is not cheap nor particularly common, so it's not like you'll accidentally stumble onto it and order it at the regular M193 price. The same is true to a lesser extent with 62 grain ammo. M855 usually has a green tip but not always. But it will cost more than 55 grain, so if you bought M855 thinking it was a good price for M193 then you really need to up your shopping skills. So that just leaves 55 grain.

          I could be completely wrong and it's commercial ammo in some random weight like 52 grains or 68 grains, but that stuff is pretty uncommon and expensive, so it comes back to the reasoning similar to Mk262; you have to be specifically looking for ammo in that weight, you don't just accidentally order it.
          Last edited by kcheung2; 01-17-2020, 10:06 AM.
          ---------------------
          "There is no "best." If there was, everyone here would own that one, and no other." - DSB

          Comment

          • #20
            eaglemike
            CGN/CGSSA Contributor - Lifetime
            CGN Contributor - Lifetime
            • Jan 2008
            • 3956

            Looks like commercial reload. 5.56 case, but who knows what it's loaded with. Did you buy some from a gun show, or a shop that sells "remanufactured" ammunition? The FC would be Federal Cartridge. That's who made the case.
            There are some people that it's just not worth engaging.

            It's a muzzle BRAKE, not a muzzle break. Or is your muzzle tired?

            Comment

            • #21
              Dave Hoback
              Banned
              • Feb 2015
              • 656

              Originally posted by jimbo74
              No, this is new stuff. I have over 300 rds of this for sure. I bought it within the last couple years, from either PSA, or a similar company. This is not ammo that was Fuego Centro whatever from 50 years ago.

              Comment

              • #22
                jtv3062
                Veteran Member
                • Oct 2005
                • 2770

                Originally posted by Rogerbutthead
                Has anyone actually seen a gun damaged by firing a 5.56 in a 223 Rem marked weapon?

                Andrew of Lucky Gunner Labs explores the differences between .223 Remington and 5.56mm NATO ammunition - and the results may surprise you!


                Just wondering. I don't think I have been very careful about what I shoot out of what - in terms of 223/5.56 weapons.
                I wonder how many of those barrels marked .223 Rem are really Wylde or NATO?
                Do not fear the enemy, for your enemy can only take your life. It is far better that you fear the media, for they will steal your Honour
                Let's pray for Obama Psalm 109:8






                159

                Comment

                Working...
                UA-8071174-1