I had a brief conversation with a webmaster for a site that I visit. He told me that since AI was added to search engines, especially Google, visits to his site has dropped off a cliff. Well over 80% of his site traffic is gone.
I don't use Google for most of my searches but I know that most people do use Google. I gave it a try and sure enough, the AI answer for searches is the top result on all searches. I was surprised that most of the time the AI answer is correct. I understand why site visits are down now. Pre-AI integration a person would enter search terms in a search engine then would have to visit the resulting links to find the answer. When the AI just gives you the answer right away, there is no longer a reason to visit the sites.
This has some deep implications. The first and immediate one is that a large number of sites are going to go off line in the near future. Reduced site visits directly translates to reduced revenue generation from advertisements.
I believe there is also a large ethical questions here, especially for Google. Google have both the most used search engine and the largest advertisement network on the Internet. Google trained its AI by scraping sites on the Internet. That is how Google's AI can provide answers quickly and accurately. By placing the AI answers at the top of the search results, Google is suppressing site visits and reducing how much it pays out in ad revenue to the same sites that it scraped to train its AI.
I have seen news stories of intellectual property owners suing AI companies for using their IP to train the AI. This recent realization of what is happening across the Internet has convinced me that these AI companies do owe IP owners payment for the training using other people's IP. Additionally, I believe that these search engines that use AI owe the sites that they scraped payment each time an AI answer is given based on the scraped data.
I don't use Google for most of my searches but I know that most people do use Google. I gave it a try and sure enough, the AI answer for searches is the top result on all searches. I was surprised that most of the time the AI answer is correct. I understand why site visits are down now. Pre-AI integration a person would enter search terms in a search engine then would have to visit the resulting links to find the answer. When the AI just gives you the answer right away, there is no longer a reason to visit the sites.
This has some deep implications. The first and immediate one is that a large number of sites are going to go off line in the near future. Reduced site visits directly translates to reduced revenue generation from advertisements.
I believe there is also a large ethical questions here, especially for Google. Google have both the most used search engine and the largest advertisement network on the Internet. Google trained its AI by scraping sites on the Internet. That is how Google's AI can provide answers quickly and accurately. By placing the AI answers at the top of the search results, Google is suppressing site visits and reducing how much it pays out in ad revenue to the same sites that it scraped to train its AI.
I have seen news stories of intellectual property owners suing AI companies for using their IP to train the AI. This recent realization of what is happening across the Internet has convinced me that these AI companies do owe IP owners payment for the training using other people's IP. Additionally, I believe that these search engines that use AI owe the sites that they scraped payment each time an AI answer is given based on the scraped data.

Comment