IIRC the real guy at Firefox was ousted in some Me Too type coup. IIRC he didn't actually "do anything" to anyone, he just said something and didn't beg. So of course he gets replaced by some not really a programmer woman to "manage" the project. Basically an HR person, not a computer person.
Does anyone know exactly to what level of ID they are selling the data? I've heard other cases where they claim its only stuff that isn't about "you" per say, just stuff like how many hits their total users give a website, or patterns, etc. But unless all that is also Open Source AND your EUA allows people to sue their asses for violations, it means nothing.
Pretty sure any MS EUA have fine print that says "we can do anything, you can do nothing", so any claims, statements, promises, "policy" about "respecting your privacy" and "only to Law Enforcement on request" and "we publish how many LE requests we get and how many we reject" besides that are meaningless and they are perfectly legally able to just plain lie about stuff....EXCEPT for the fact they are noticeably NOT in the EUA.
Its like when a DA or AG makes some big statement on the court house steps. They are Govt Officials and "Officers of the Court" but ain't Under Oath so they can and do tell any lies they want, including about the "Facts of the Case".
Does anyone know exactly to what level of ID they are selling the data? I've heard other cases where they claim its only stuff that isn't about "you" per say, just stuff like how many hits their total users give a website, or patterns, etc. But unless all that is also Open Source AND your EUA allows people to sue their asses for violations, it means nothing.
Pretty sure any MS EUA have fine print that says "we can do anything, you can do nothing", so any claims, statements, promises, "policy" about "respecting your privacy" and "only to Law Enforcement on request" and "we publish how many LE requests we get and how many we reject" besides that are meaningless and they are perfectly legally able to just plain lie about stuff....EXCEPT for the fact they are noticeably NOT in the EUA.
Its like when a DA or AG makes some big statement on the court house steps. They are Govt Officials and "Officers of the Court" but ain't Under Oath so they can and do tell any lies they want, including about the "Facts of the Case".
Comment