The more i read about what the expectation is of protection and the methods that would be required, I can't help but see this as the beginning of the end of the internet as we know it.
Burden of policing placed on ISPs
Authoritarian control over ISPs' networks by government
Where will this lead?
Cable Television 2.0 I'm not sure how many users here actually understand how DNS works but those of you that do - doesn't this bill basically start the ball rolling towards 100% self contained "networks" ?
DNS had huge suggestive exploits for years because it works via consensus. Now, if you have some systems which "don't see" a website but others that do - thats the easy part. What will happen rather quickly is some domains may resolve to one address while another "ISP" may resolve it to another - because instead of allowing this consensus process, they now have to police their own DNS records, and "to err on legal safety" they will likely no longer run DNS on a consensus model but instead a true, whitelist.
Whitelisting will be cumbersome, cost money in maintenance and will ultimately (through the process of design and improvement) become propriety whitelist(s) and as such, the end user is no longer "surfing the internet" but instead "flipping through the cyber channels alotted to their subscription"
Is anyone else seeing this as the entertainment industry's goal ? Maybe it's just me but here's "the TL
R" version of above:
Because of how this bill places responsibility of the DNS hide and seek game on the ISP - the ISP will evolve (devolve? ) into no longer using a DNS system but simply a whitelist. Am I mistaken? If so then how/why?
thanks
edit: to expand on this - the "holy wtf slopfest" that im worried about comes not from the ISPs or the end user but from the middle man - the website caught in this. Will websites have to pay a "listing fee" with ISPs to have their site listed? What if a site resolves one site with one ISP but another with another? The mess this could create, legally, is insane
Burden of policing placed on ISPs
Authoritarian control over ISPs' networks by government
Where will this lead?
Cable Television 2.0 I'm not sure how many users here actually understand how DNS works but those of you that do - doesn't this bill basically start the ball rolling towards 100% self contained "networks" ?
DNS had huge suggestive exploits for years because it works via consensus. Now, if you have some systems which "don't see" a website but others that do - thats the easy part. What will happen rather quickly is some domains may resolve to one address while another "ISP" may resolve it to another - because instead of allowing this consensus process, they now have to police their own DNS records, and "to err on legal safety" they will likely no longer run DNS on a consensus model but instead a true, whitelist.
Whitelisting will be cumbersome, cost money in maintenance and will ultimately (through the process of design and improvement) become propriety whitelist(s) and as such, the end user is no longer "surfing the internet" but instead "flipping through the cyber channels alotted to their subscription"
Is anyone else seeing this as the entertainment industry's goal ? Maybe it's just me but here's "the TL
R" version of above: Because of how this bill places responsibility of the DNS hide and seek game on the ISP - the ISP will evolve (devolve? ) into no longer using a DNS system but simply a whitelist. Am I mistaken? If so then how/why?
thanks
edit: to expand on this - the "holy wtf slopfest" that im worried about comes not from the ISPs or the end user but from the middle man - the website caught in this. Will websites have to pay a "listing fee" with ISPs to have their site listed? What if a site resolves one site with one ISP but another with another? The mess this could create, legally, is insane


Comment