Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Computer Upgrades

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #16
    Nose Nuggets
    Calguns Addict
    • Apr 2008
    • 6801

    Originally posted by HK4113
    Me too, but the comparison system on the site is difficult to work with, because the two cpu's I am trying to compare were from different years and it doesn't seem to let you do that type of comparison.
    if you go to charts it should list multiple years.
    Last edited by Nose Nuggets; 09-27-2011, 10:09 AM.


    "It is to secure our rights that we resort to government at all." -Thomas Jefferson

    Comment

    • #17
      HK4113
      Senior Member
      • Dec 2008
      • 1296

      Originally posted by Nose Nuggets
      if you go to charts it should list multiple years.
      It does list multiple years, however it wont let me compare processors from multiple years on one graph if I click both of the select boxes and click compare. Unless I am doing it wrong which is entirely possible.

      If you know how to, let me know because that would be neat to be able to do.

      Comment

      • #18
        Merc1138
        I need a LIFE!!
        • Feb 2009
        • 19742

        Originally posted by HK4113
        It does list multiple years, however it wont let me compare processors from multiple years on one graph if I click both of the select boxes and click compare. Unless I am doing it wrong which is entirely possible.

        If you know how to, let me know because that would be neat to be able to do.
        We've run thousands of CPU benchmarks on all new and older Intel and AMD CPUs and ranked them.

        Comment

        • #19
          HK4113
          Senior Member
          • Dec 2008
          • 1296

          That is helpful in terms of a strict which is better, but this is not what Nose was looking for in terms of the individual benchmark tests.

          Indeed, this hierarchy chart is useful as a general guideline, but certainly not as a one-size-fits-all CPU comparison resource. For that, we recommend you check out our CPU Performance Charts.

          Comment

          • #20
            Merc1138
            I need a LIFE!!
            • Feb 2009
            • 19742

            Originally posted by HK4113
            That is helpful in terms of a strict which is better, but this is not what Nose was looking for in terms of the individual benchmark tests.
            So then look up the individual benchmark tests. I don't see what the issue is. Open one benchmark in one browser window, open the other benchmark in another.

            Comment

            • #21
              snypr
              Senior Member
              • Jan 2006
              • 1142

              what about the 580 or 590? not worth it for a small bump in performance?
              Originally posted by Lone_Gunman
              American stormed the beaches of Normandy, not Europeans. Americans invented the airplane, personal computer, telephone, radio, TV, GPS, the DVR, automatic transmission, laser, and f'ing bubble gum. EUROPEANS DIDN"T. So until you asshats start providing the world with more innovation than Americans do how about you STFU about us?

              Comment

              • #22
                HK4113
                Senior Member
                • Dec 2008
                • 1296

                Originally posted by Merc1138
                So then look up the individual benchmark tests. I don't see what the issue is. Open one benchmark in one browser window, open the other benchmark in another.
                I was trying to post it here like the one I did earlier, I can view them perfectly fine for myself in separate windows.

                Comment

                • #23
                  ibanezfoo
                  I need a LIFE!!
                  • Apr 2007
                  • 12038

                  Originally posted by snypr
                  what about the 580 or 590? not worth it for a small bump in performance?
                  vindicta inducit ad salutem?

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  UA-8071174-1