Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Planck time question

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #16
    brohymn
    Senior Member
    • Jun 2014
    • 509

    Originally posted by Richmond10mm
    Struggling......

    I watched a reality is a sim vid and they mentioned that the speed of light has not been measured exactly....but when I look at the damnable internet and it says meters/second in a perfect vacuum is EXACTLY 299,792,458 (I am amazed that it is a round number....) well then that sounds like a constant?

    So.......if the speed of light isn't exact and we are just approximating, how can a unit of Planck time based on the speed of light be a constant?

    So how can I buy into the idea that Time is unitized, digitalized, pixelated, step by step, frame by frame, Planck unit by Planck unit, if the basic measurement has analog properties? Confused to say the least.
    As mentioned before, it's exactly that value as it is defined as such in SI. In reality it's not exactly that value.



    "After centuries of increasingly precise measurements, in 1975 the speed of light was known to be 299,792,458 m/s (186,282 mi /s) with a measurement uncertainty of 4 parts per billion. In 1983, the metre was redefined in the International System of Units (SI) as the distance travelled by light in vacuum in 1/299792458 of a second. As a result, the numerical value of c in metres per second is now fixed exactly by the definition of the metre.[6]"

    In terms of order of magnitude, we knew the value to 1 part in one hundred million (since the uncertainty was on the order of 1 part in per billion) and truncated the rest for convenience of the SI definition.

    This is not unlike pretty much any other physical constant, in that we only know them to a certain accepted level of uncertainty (e.g., Avogadro's Number, Universal Gravitational Constant, and Planck's constant).

    The way this is handled in practice would be to use the accepted values as a best estimate and then perform the appropriate error propagation calculations to then place an uncertainty / error value on the quantity calculated.
    Last edited by brohymn; 08-02-2017, 3:41 PM.

    Comment

    Working...
    UA-8071174-1