Okay so I legally own quite a few high caps that I purchased long before any ban. I already know the legality of these.
Is it right to say tat effectively California has zero control over high caps for anyone that wants any? I mean, there are a proliferation of vendors who will sell high caps for....ahem....repair purposes (wink wink). I know people who have flown to another state and fedexed themselves high caps as well.
So what's the deal? Again, I am fully aware of what the law says, but since you are not required to present LEOs with receipts or proof you had the magazines before the ban, what stops people from buying these today and stating you had 'em before the ban?
I'm trying to figure this out but am coming to the conclusion that the high cap magazine thing is totally, completely unenforceable in practice. Agreements?
Is it right to say tat effectively California has zero control over high caps for anyone that wants any? I mean, there are a proliferation of vendors who will sell high caps for....ahem....repair purposes (wink wink). I know people who have flown to another state and fedexed themselves high caps as well.
So what's the deal? Again, I am fully aware of what the law says, but since you are not required to present LEOs with receipts or proof you had the magazines before the ban, what stops people from buying these today and stating you had 'em before the ban?
I'm trying to figure this out but am coming to the conclusion that the high cap magazine thing is totally, completely unenforceable in practice. Agreements?
Comment