I figure it like this. Most (I know, I'm generalizing) folks dressed out in operator gear at a public range are city folks that weren't raised around firearms. Not to matter, though. They have discovered firearms a little later in life, but these guys finally got the chance to go shooting, & they really like it. They eat, sleep, & breathe guns, optics, ammo, & anything that goes with shooting sports. Range trips, gun shows, books, magazines, internet forums, these guys have enthusiasm off the charts for it all. But don't be hatin' on these serious hobby type shooters because they could be the true enthusiast among us; they really love guns.
Because these folks love their hobby & their guns so much, this group is much more politically active than country boys like me that grew up with guns around. I feel that guns are ok & are a part of life, but I don't love 'em. Folks like me are part to blame because we took the freedoms of the 2nd amendment for granted & didn't open our eyes or care enough to see that the gov was taking our freedoms one increment at a time. It sounded ok to lots of complacent gun owners in the 60's & 70's when laws were being passed with words like Safe Handgun Roster. Hey, that sounds great, right? Who in their right mind wants an unsafe gun. If it can save only 1 life! Never dawned on us at the time the gov was using the roster to keep handguns out of the hands of minorities & the poor. And who needs an AR or AK? Just the soldier of fortune types. Every hunter knows a 30.06 or 270 model 70 Winchester is a better deer rifle.
Too much ground was lost before shooters back then finally started to figure out the true motives behind these legislators & these laws that had innocent titles that took our freedoms bit by bit. I think people are more aware, & are waking up to acknowledge that the 2nd amendment is about much more than hunting or target shooting. My opinion is the newer shooter/serious hobby types that love guns & are politically aware are folks we should welcome to our fold. They may dress different, be younger, but we need their enthusiasm, numbers, & dollars if we have any hope for our cause.
Because these folks love their hobby & their guns so much, this group is much more politically active than country boys like me that grew up with guns around. I feel that guns are ok & are a part of life, but I don't love 'em. Folks like me are part to blame because we took the freedoms of the 2nd amendment for granted & didn't open our eyes or care enough to see that the gov was taking our freedoms one increment at a time. It sounded ok to lots of complacent gun owners in the 60's & 70's when laws were being passed with words like Safe Handgun Roster. Hey, that sounds great, right? Who in their right mind wants an unsafe gun. If it can save only 1 life! Never dawned on us at the time the gov was using the roster to keep handguns out of the hands of minorities & the poor. And who needs an AR or AK? Just the soldier of fortune types. Every hunter knows a 30.06 or 270 model 70 Winchester is a better deer rifle.
Too much ground was lost before shooters back then finally started to figure out the true motives behind these legislators & these laws that had innocent titles that took our freedoms bit by bit. I think people are more aware, & are waking up to acknowledge that the 2nd amendment is about much more than hunting or target shooting. My opinion is the newer shooter/serious hobby types that love guns & are politically aware are folks we should welcome to our fold. They may dress different, be younger, but we need their enthusiasm, numbers, & dollars if we have any hope for our cause.


Comment