Looks like a good time! Keep the updates coming...
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHOT Show 2014
Collapse
X
-
And now to end the speculation.
I spent a fair bit of time today speaking to Kevin Reid from Ruger.
He is a Vice President and General Counsel for Ruger.
Here is the word from the source:
Ruger is NOT making a concerted effort to allow guns to drop off roster.
They are continuing to submit firearms to CA for testing, they pass all the testing however DoJ has told the testing lab that if they do not have microstamping don't bother to send the test results over.
The problem lies in what DoJ considers to a 'change'.
We all know that the identical firearm with a different colorant added to the polymer frame is seen as an entirely different firearm and has to be certified on it's own.
Ruger makes changes to improve manufacturing and their firearms, they are told by CA DoJ that those changes make it a 'new model' that has to meet the new requirement.
In the case of the SR-22 they changed the breech block was originally forged, when they changed to a MiM breech block CA DoJ said it was a material change that required new testing and certification.
The models that are falling off the roster this year have had minor changes to their manufacturing or design that Cal DoJ says requires microstamping to re-certify.
I asked Kevin point blank, 'Is their an intentional move to allow handguns to fall off the roster and/or stop selling pistols in California?'
He was adamant that Ruger is committed to selling handguns in California but they are convinced that Cal DoJ is using microstamping as a means to create a defacto ban that will eventually mean no pistols are legal to sell in California.
He said that in cases where no changes that Cal DoJ says requires new testing and certification have been made they will maintain them on the roster. However with constant updates and improvements to design and manufacturing processes there's not many that are going to be able to stay static.
That's the real story on Ruger.sigpic NRA Benefactor Life Member / CRPA Life Member / SAF Life Member
Calguns.net an incorported entity - President.
The Calguns Shooting Sports Assoc. - Vice President.
The California Rifle & Pistol Assoc. - Director.
DONATE TO NRA-ILA, CGSSA, AND CRPAF NOW!
Opinions posted in this account are my own and unless specifically stated as such are not the approved position of Calguns.net, CGSSA or CRPA.Comment
-
Kes, Ivan and Lorax out of town? Let the OT games begin!Comment
-
Geeze. Good thing what the Government/Cal DOJ is doing isn't unconstitutional or anything... SheeshAnd now to end the speculation.
I spent a fair bit of time today speaking to Kevin Reid from Ruger.
He is a Vice President and General Counsel for Ruger.
Here is the word from the source:
Ruger is NOT making a concerted effort to allow guns to drop off roster.
They are continuing to submit firearms to CA for testing, they pass all the testing however DoJ has told the testing lab that if they do not have microstamping don't bother to send the test results over.
The problem lies in what DoJ considers to a 'change'.
We all know that the identical firearm with a different colorant added to the polymer frame is seen as an entirely different firearm and has to be certified on it's own.
Ruger makes changes to improve manufacturing and their firearms, they are told by CA DoJ that those changes make it a 'new model' that has to meet the new requirement.
In the case of the SR-22 they changed the breech block was originally forged, when they changed to a MiM breech block CA DoJ said it was a material change that required new testing and certification.
The models that are falling off the roster this year have had minor changes to their manufacturing or design that Cal DoJ says requires microstamping to re-certify.
I asked Kevin point blank, 'Is their an intentional move to allow handguns to fall off the roster and/or stop selling pistols in California?'
He was adamant that Ruger is committed to selling handguns in California but they are convinced that Cal DoJ is using microstamping as a means to create a defacto ban that will eventually mean no pistols are legal to sell in California.
He said that in cases where no changes that Cal DoJ says requires new testing and certification have been made they will maintain them on the roster. However with constant updates and improvements to design and manufacturing processes there's not many that are going to be able to stay static.
That's the real story on Ruger.
sigpicComment
-
CalDOJ is just doing the bidding of the Brady's, nothing new.And now to end the speculation.
I spent a fair bit of time today speaking to Kevin Reid from Ruger.
He is a Vice President and General Counsel for Ruger.
Here is the word from the source:
Ruger is NOT making a concerted effort to allow guns to drop off roster.
They are continuing to submit firearms to CA for testing, they pass all the testing however DoJ has told the testing lab that if they do not have microstamping don't bother to send the test results over.
The problem lies in what DoJ considers to a 'change'.
We all know that the identical firearm with a different colorant added to the polymer frame is seen as an entirely different firearm and has to be certified on it's own.
Ruger makes changes to improve manufacturing and their firearms, they are told by CA DoJ that those changes make it a 'new model' that has to meet the new requirement.
In the case of the SR-22 they changed the breech block was originally forged, when they changed to a MiM breech block CA DoJ said it was a material change that required new testing and certification.
The models that are falling off the roster this year have had minor changes to their manufacturing or design that Cal DoJ says requires microstamping to re-certify.
I asked Kevin point blank, 'Is their an intentional move to allow handguns to fall off the roster and/or stop selling pistols in California?'
He was adamant that Ruger is committed to selling handguns in California but they are convinced that Cal DoJ is using microstamping as a means to create a defacto ban that will eventually mean no pistols are legal to sell in California.
He said that in cases where no changes that Cal DoJ says requires new testing and certification have been made they will maintain them on the roster. However with constant updates and improvements to design and manufacturing processes there's not many that are going to be able to stay static.
That's the real story on Ruger.Comment
-
I am surprised that a lawsuit hasn't come forward. Is there plans from Calguns or the NRA to challenge this?Calguns Contributor
NRA Benefactor Member
CRPA Member
San Diego County Gun Owners Patriot Member
What have you done for 2A lately?

Comment
-
Yep.
War is when your Government tells you who the enemy is......
Revolution is when you figure it out for yourself.Comment
-
Was Colion Noir at the NRA booth or just wandering the show?sigpic
Join the discussion at www.utahguns.net
Isaiah 41:10Originally posted by HP911sweet jesus, the subject matter experts are 97!
So do not fear, for I am with you;
do not be dismayed, for I am your God.
I will strengthen you and help you;
I will uphold you with my righteous right hand.Comment
-
sub60% of the time, it works every time.Comment
-
Hey, did you see "Expertish" (aka Jason Veraldi) - up there?
I heard he has a booth; and taking orders on Mosins.-----------------------------------------------
Originally posted by LibrarianWhat compelling interest has any level of government in knowing what guns are owned by civilians? (Those owned by government should be inventoried and tracked, for exactly the same reasons computers and desks and chairs are tracked: responsible care of public property.)
If some level of government had that information, what would they do with it? How would having that info benefit public safety? How would it benefit law enforcement?Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,865,686
Posts: 25,133,741
Members: 355,945
Active Members: 3,886
Welcome to our newest member, glocksource.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 6513 users online. 41 members and 6472 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 10:39 PM on 02-14-2026.


Comment