Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

SHOT Show 2014

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #31
    Ferrum
    Janitors Mop
    CGN Contributor - Lifetime
    • Aug 2011
    • 4431

    Looks like a good time! Keep the updates coming...

    Comment

    • #32
      daphonz
      Senior Member
      • Aug 2012
      • 593

      Is it just me or does that Remington R51 remind anyone else of the original Lazer Tag guns?

      Comment

      • #33
        SNCaliber
        Veteran Member
        • Mar 2012
        • 3222

        thanks for the previews, I dig that bufferless .22 AR pistol!
        -Sang

        Comment

        • #34
          engi
          Senior Member
          • Nov 2010
          • 1080

          Was there yesterday and today with cal.bar. Too bad we didn't link up. Had to leave today so keep those pictures coming.
          sigpic

          Comment

          • #35
            Kestryll
            Head Janitor
            • Oct 2005
            • 21584

            And now to end the speculation.

            I spent a fair bit of time today speaking to Kevin Reid from Ruger.
            He is a Vice President and General Counsel for Ruger.

            Here is the word from the source:
            Ruger is NOT making a concerted effort to allow guns to drop off roster.
            They are continuing to submit firearms to CA for testing, they pass all the testing however DoJ has told the testing lab that if they do not have microstamping don't bother to send the test results over.

            The problem lies in what DoJ considers to a 'change'.
            We all know that the identical firearm with a different colorant added to the polymer frame is seen as an entirely different firearm and has to be certified on it's own.
            Ruger makes changes to improve manufacturing and their firearms, they are told by CA DoJ that those changes make it a 'new model' that has to meet the new requirement.

            In the case of the SR-22 they changed the breech block was originally forged, when they changed to a MiM breech block CA DoJ said it was a material change that required new testing and certification.
            The models that are falling off the roster this year have had minor changes to their manufacturing or design that Cal DoJ says requires microstamping to re-certify.

            I asked Kevin point blank, 'Is their an intentional move to allow handguns to fall off the roster and/or stop selling pistols in California?'
            He was adamant that Ruger is committed to selling handguns in California but they are convinced that Cal DoJ is using microstamping as a means to create a defacto ban that will eventually mean no pistols are legal to sell in California.

            He said that in cases where no changes that Cal DoJ says requires new testing and certification have been made they will maintain them on the roster. However with constant updates and improvements to design and manufacturing processes there's not many that are going to be able to stay static.

            That's the real story on Ruger.
            sigpic NRA Benefactor Life Member / CRPA Life Member / SAF Life Member
            Calguns.net an incorported entity - President.
            The Calguns Shooting Sports Assoc. - Vice President.
            The California Rifle & Pistol Assoc. - Director.
            DONATE TO NRA-ILA, CGSSA, AND CRPAF NOW!
            Opinions posted in this account are my own and unless specifically stated as such are not the approved position of Calguns.net, CGSSA or CRPA.

            Comment

            • #36
              cabinetguy
              Release the Cabinets!
              CGN Contributor - Lifetime
              • Sep 2010
              • 12659

              Kes, Ivan and Lorax out of town? Let the OT games begin!

              Comment

              • #37
                JWHuey
                Senior Member
                • Jun 2011
                • 2300

                Originally posted by Kestryll
                And now to end the speculation.

                I spent a fair bit of time today speaking to Kevin Reid from Ruger.
                He is a Vice President and General Counsel for Ruger.

                Here is the word from the source:
                Ruger is NOT making a concerted effort to allow guns to drop off roster.
                They are continuing to submit firearms to CA for testing, they pass all the testing however DoJ has told the testing lab that if they do not have microstamping don't bother to send the test results over.

                The problem lies in what DoJ considers to a 'change'.
                We all know that the identical firearm with a different colorant added to the polymer frame is seen as an entirely different firearm and has to be certified on it's own.
                Ruger makes changes to improve manufacturing and their firearms, they are told by CA DoJ that those changes make it a 'new model' that has to meet the new requirement.

                In the case of the SR-22 they changed the breech block was originally forged, when they changed to a MiM breech block CA DoJ said it was a material change that required new testing and certification.
                The models that are falling off the roster this year have had minor changes to their manufacturing or design that Cal DoJ says requires microstamping to re-certify.

                I asked Kevin point blank, 'Is their an intentional move to allow handguns to fall off the roster and/or stop selling pistols in California?'
                He was adamant that Ruger is committed to selling handguns in California but they are convinced that Cal DoJ is using microstamping as a means to create a defacto ban that will eventually mean no pistols are legal to sell in California.

                He said that in cases where no changes that Cal DoJ says requires new testing and certification have been made they will maintain them on the roster. However with constant updates and improvements to design and manufacturing processes there's not many that are going to be able to stay static.

                That's the real story on Ruger.
                Geeze. Good thing what the Government/Cal DOJ is doing isn't unconstitutional or anything... Sheesh
                sigpic

                Comment

                • #38
                  Ford8N
                  Banned
                  • Sep 2002
                  • 6129

                  Originally posted by Kestryll
                  And now to end the speculation.

                  I spent a fair bit of time today speaking to Kevin Reid from Ruger.
                  He is a Vice President and General Counsel for Ruger.

                  Here is the word from the source:
                  Ruger is NOT making a concerted effort to allow guns to drop off roster.
                  They are continuing to submit firearms to CA for testing, they pass all the testing however DoJ has told the testing lab that if they do not have microstamping don't bother to send the test results over.

                  The problem lies in what DoJ considers to a 'change'.
                  We all know that the identical firearm with a different colorant added to the polymer frame is seen as an entirely different firearm and has to be certified on it's own.
                  Ruger makes changes to improve manufacturing and their firearms, they are told by CA DoJ that those changes make it a 'new model' that has to meet the new requirement.

                  In the case of the SR-22 they changed the breech block was originally forged, when they changed to a MiM breech block CA DoJ said it was a material change that required new testing and certification.
                  The models that are falling off the roster this year have had minor changes to their manufacturing or design that Cal DoJ says requires microstamping to re-certify.

                  I asked Kevin point blank, 'Is their an intentional move to allow handguns to fall off the roster and/or stop selling pistols in California?'
                  He was adamant that Ruger is committed to selling handguns in California but they are convinced that Cal DoJ is using microstamping as a means to create a defacto ban that will eventually mean no pistols are legal to sell in California.

                  He said that in cases where no changes that Cal DoJ says requires new testing and certification have been made they will maintain them on the roster. However with constant updates and improvements to design and manufacturing processes there's not many that are going to be able to stay static.

                  That's the real story on Ruger.
                  CalDOJ is just doing the bidding of the Brady's, nothing new.

                  Comment

                  • #39
                    Danodog
                    CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                    CGN Contributor
                    • May 2013
                    • 2531

                    I am surprised that a lawsuit hasn't come forward. Is there plans from Calguns or the NRA to challenge this?
                    Calguns Contributor
                    NRA Benefactor Member
                    CRPA Member
                    San Diego County Gun Owners Patriot Member
                    What have you done for 2A lately?

                    Comment

                    • #40
                      jaymz
                      CGSSA Associate
                      • Oct 2006
                      • 6298

                      Originally posted by Danodog
                      I am surprised that a lawsuit hasn't come forward. Is there plans from Calguns or the NRA to challenge this?
                      Yep.

                      War is when your Government tells you who the enemy is......

                      Revolution is when you figure it out for yourself.

                      Comment

                      • #41
                        BakoJ
                        top poster @ utahguns.net
                        CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                        • Dec 2012
                        • 2293

                        Was Colion Noir at the NRA booth or just wandering the show?
                        sigpic
                        Join the discussion at www.utahguns.net

                        Originally posted by HP911
                        sweet jesus, the subject matter experts are 97!
                        Isaiah 41:10
                        So do not fear, for I am with you;
                        do not be dismayed, for I am your God.
                        I will strengthen you and help you;
                        I will uphold you with my righteous right hand.

                        Comment

                        • #42
                          h0use
                          Calguns Addict
                          • Jul 2009
                          • 5783

                          Originally posted by bako88fan
                          Was Colion Noir at the NRA booth or just wandering the show?

                          Yesterday he was at the NRA booth

                          Comment

                          • #43
                            Echo5Hotel
                            Junior Member
                            • Apr 2013
                            • 34

                            sub
                            60% of the time, it works every time.

                            Comment

                            • #44
                              The Gleam
                              I need a LIFE!!
                              • Feb 2011
                              • 12407

                              Hey, did you see "Expertish" (aka Jason Veraldi) - up there?

                              I heard he has a booth; and taking orders on Mosins.
                              -----------------------------------------------
                              Originally posted by Librarian
                              What compelling interest has any level of government in knowing what guns are owned by civilians? (Those owned by government should be inventoried and tracked, for exactly the same reasons computers and desks and chairs are tracked: responsible care of public property.)

                              If some level of government had that information, what would they do with it? How would having that info benefit public safety? How would it benefit law enforcement?

                              Comment

                              • #45
                                SuperSet
                                Calguns Addict
                                • Feb 2007
                                • 9048

                                Originally posted by The Gleam
                                Hey, did you see "Expertish" (aka Jason Veraldi) - up there?

                                I heard he has a booth; and taking orders on Mosins.
                                Too soon, man, too soon.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1