Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

80% transfered to son ??

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #16
    readysetgo
    CGSSA Coordinator
    • Aug 2011
    • 8694

    Originally posted by CSACANNONEER
    A receiver is not a long gun no matter how it is transfered or what the intentions are so, one needs to be 18 to own one or 21 to purchase one.
    Wait... citations?

    CA wise I don't see why no bare receiver.
    Fed, I'm thinking "licensee" are restricted from transfering the "other" but only thing I see about gifting to under 18 by non-licensee (parent) is "No Handgun" [18 usc 922 x].

    What am I missing? Fed restriction, right? Donde esta?
    Stand up and be counted, or lay down and be mounted... -Mac

    Comment

    • #17
      Mssr. Eleganté
      Blue Blaze Irregular
      CGN Contributor - Lifetime
      • Oct 2005
      • 10401

      Originally posted by CSACANNONEER
      ...A receiver is not a long gun no matter how it is transfered or what the intentions are so, one needs to be 18 to own one or 21 to purchase one.
      There is no age restiction on owning an "other" like a stripped AR lower. In California you have to be 18 to own a handgun, but there is no age restriction for owning non-handguns (outside of "assault weapon" restrictions).
      __________________

      "Knowledge is power... For REAL!" - Jack Austin

      Comment

      • #18
        Sunday
        Calguns Addict
        • Jan 2010
        • 5574

        I thought you son built it.
        California's politicians and unionized government employees are a crime gang that makes the Mexican drug cartels look like a Girl Scout Troop in comparison.

        Comment

        Working...
        UA-8071174-1