I serve on the board of the California Association of Bicycling Organizations, and am a member of several firearms organizations.
I have the 2012 edition of the excellent reference California Gun Laws.
In Chapter 6 section IV B 2 it discusses Transporting Handguns in Vehicles. Most of the discussion is around motor vehicles, and addressing motorcycles and boats specifically.
A bicycle in California is not a vehicle (CVC 670 and 231), though a bicyclist on a highway (a.k.a. public street) has all the rights and duties of the driver of a vehicle (CVC 21200) with respect to traffic law.
Does a person in possession of a handgun while traveling by bicycle on a highway also have the same rights and duties as the driver of a vehicle with respect to firearms laws?
Specifically, are the issues about locked containers, accessibility by the operator, safe passage through "gun-free school zones", etc. the same for a bicyclist as for, say, a motorcyclist or automobile driver?
In traffic law, much hinges on whether the code specifies "motor vehicle" (in which case it applies narrowly only to motor vehicles and their operators) or "vehicle" (in which case it also applies to bicycles and their operators).
In firearms law, is there such a distinction between "motor vehicle" and "vehicle"? Which wording is used in the codes relevant to these questions?
I'm asking specifically about handguns because it's unlikely any of our members would wish to transport a long gun (rifle or shotgun) via bicycle on a highway, because of their weight and cumbersome size, though those answers would be interesting as well.
For my own application, I wish to find the lightest weight and least bulky way to lawfully transport a handgun and its ammunition on both a motorcycle and a bicycle.
My motorcycle's attached cases are rigid, locked closed, and locked to the vehicle; but my bicycle's luggage is fabric, not locked closed, and not locked to the bicycle.
I anticipate I might find different answers for those two applications.
Thanks for any insights!
I have the 2012 edition of the excellent reference California Gun Laws.
In Chapter 6 section IV B 2 it discusses Transporting Handguns in Vehicles. Most of the discussion is around motor vehicles, and addressing motorcycles and boats specifically.
A bicycle in California is not a vehicle (CVC 670 and 231), though a bicyclist on a highway (a.k.a. public street) has all the rights and duties of the driver of a vehicle (CVC 21200) with respect to traffic law.
Does a person in possession of a handgun while traveling by bicycle on a highway also have the same rights and duties as the driver of a vehicle with respect to firearms laws?
Specifically, are the issues about locked containers, accessibility by the operator, safe passage through "gun-free school zones", etc. the same for a bicyclist as for, say, a motorcyclist or automobile driver?
In traffic law, much hinges on whether the code specifies "motor vehicle" (in which case it applies narrowly only to motor vehicles and their operators) or "vehicle" (in which case it also applies to bicycles and their operators).
In firearms law, is there such a distinction between "motor vehicle" and "vehicle"? Which wording is used in the codes relevant to these questions?
I'm asking specifically about handguns because it's unlikely any of our members would wish to transport a long gun (rifle or shotgun) via bicycle on a highway, because of their weight and cumbersome size, though those answers would be interesting as well.
For my own application, I wish to find the lightest weight and least bulky way to lawfully transport a handgun and its ammunition on both a motorcycle and a bicycle.
My motorcycle's attached cases are rigid, locked closed, and locked to the vehicle; but my bicycle's luggage is fabric, not locked closed, and not locked to the bicycle.
I anticipate I might find different answers for those two applications.
Thanks for any insights!



Comment