Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

ATF Binary Exploding Targets ruling BATFE

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #76
    wildhawker
    I need a LIFE!!
    • Nov 2008
    • 14150

    Originally posted by jj805
    If he was convicted a few years ago, and with the availability of Tannerite today, the and the BATFE letter dated 05/29/12, Do you think he would stand a chance at an appeal?
    That case is over and, in any case, the BATFE letter doesn't do a thing for California law except, perhaps, support the theory that the material is an explosive.

    -Brandon
    Brandon Combs

    I do not read private messages, and my inbox is usually full. If you need to reach me, please email me instead.

    My comments are not the official position or a statement of any organization unless stated otherwise. My comments are not legal advice; if you want or need legal advice, hire a lawyer.

    Comment

    • #77
      LBDamned
      I need a LIFE!!
      • Feb 2011
      • 19040

      Originally posted by Hoop
      There has been a calgunner who got convicted for Tannerite. Bwiese mentioned something about it last year. Just because you don't want to hear it doesn't make it 'Fud'.
      I don't advocate the use (in CA), but...

      "A" CalGunner convicted vs many, many, many that apparently have used and not convicted makes me wonder if there wasn't more to the lone calgunner's situation?
      "Kamala is a radical leftist lunatic" ~ Donald J. Trump

      Comment

      • #78
        wildhawker
        I need a LIFE!!
        • Nov 2008
        • 14150

        Originally posted by LBDamned
        I don't advocate the use (in CA), but...

        "A" CalGunner convicted vs many, many, many that apparently have used and not convicted makes me wonder if there wasn't more to the lone calgunner's situation?
        There wasn't.

        The number is greater than 1.

        -Brandon
        Brandon Combs

        I do not read private messages, and my inbox is usually full. If you need to reach me, please email me instead.

        My comments are not the official position or a statement of any organization unless stated otherwise. My comments are not legal advice; if you want or need legal advice, hire a lawyer.

        Comment

        • #79
          LBDamned
          I need a LIFE!!
          • Feb 2011
          • 19040

          Originally posted by wildhawker
          There wasn't.

          The number is greater than 1.

          -Brandon
          10-4... I figured the mention of "A" Calgunner" and "The" case is over, indicated a solos occurrence.
          "Kamala is a radical leftist lunatic" ~ Donald J. Trump

          Comment

          • #80
            Fjold
            I need a LIFE!!
            • Oct 2005
            • 22848

            My personal philosophy is never give them Probable Cause.
            Frank

            One rifle, one planet, Holland's 375




            Life Member NRA, CRPA and SAF

            Comment

            • #81
              Capybara
              CGSSA Coordinator
              CGN Contributor
              • Feb 2012
              • 15185

              Not worth going to prison over.
              NRA Certified Metallic Cartridge Reloading Instructor, Shotgun Instructor and Range Safety Officer

              sigpic

              Comment

              • #82
                jlbflyboy172
                Senior Member
                • Feb 2007
                • 625

                Originally posted by Hoop
                There has been a calgunner who got convicted for Tannerite. Bwiese mentioned something about it last year. Just because you don't want to hear it doesn't make it 'Fud'.

                Evidence please. Without it sure sounds like FUD to me. It is one thing to say do it at your own risk because there is no really clear known ruling. It is another thing to declare it illegal with the absence of that ruling from the CA DOJ.

                Comment

                • #83
                  wildhawker
                  I need a LIFE!!
                  • Nov 2008
                  • 14150

                  Originally posted by jlbflyboy172
                  Evidence please. Without it sure sounds like FUD to me. It is one thing to say do it at your own risk because there is no really clear known ruling. It is another thing to declare it illegal with the absence of that ruling from the CA DOJ.
                  Yep, the leaders of California gun rights who deal with criminal defenses of firearms issues on a regular basis and run a [the] Hotline are all saying something happened - it must be FUD.



                  -Brandon
                  Brandon Combs

                  I do not read private messages, and my inbox is usually full. If you need to reach me, please email me instead.

                  My comments are not the official position or a statement of any organization unless stated otherwise. My comments are not legal advice; if you want or need legal advice, hire a lawyer.

                  Comment

                  • #84
                    bwiese
                    I need a LIFE!!
                    • Oct 2005
                    • 27621

                    Originally posted by jlbflyboy172
                    Evidence please. Without it sure sounds like FUD to me. It is one thing to say do it at your own risk because there is no really clear known ruling. It is another thing to declare it illegal with the absence of that ruling from the CA DOJ.
                    Hey, sonny, I was the one that brought this up.

                    The individual is a good Calgunner that has done much for the movement.
                    The drama was in SoCal, and took $15+K of lawyering to get felony down to misdemeanor with 18 month firearms prohibition. And that option is not even really clearly presented in the law.

                    [The individual was in fact quite afraid of missing a possible OLL 'time window' back in 2006 in case that closed before his 18mos was up.]

                    The law is pretty clear, despite your apparent failure to read. And lack of a ruling by DOJ has nothing to due with legality.

                    Bill Wiese
                    San Jose, CA

                    CGF Board Member / NRA Benefactor Life Member / CRPA life member
                    sigpic
                    No postings of mine here, unless otherwise specifically noted, are
                    to be construed as formal or informal positions of the Calguns.Net
                    ownership, The Calguns Foundation, Inc. ("CGF"), the NRA, or my
                    employer. No posts of mine on Calguns are to be construed as
                    legal advice, which can only be given by a lawyer.

                    Comment

                    • #85
                      odysseus
                      I need a LIFE!!
                      • Dec 2005
                      • 10407

                      Originally posted by jlbflyboy172
                      It is one thing to say do it at your own risk because there is no really clear known ruling. It is another thing to declare it illegal with the absence of that ruling from the CA DOJ.
                      58 DA's.
                      "Just leave me alone, I know what to do." - Kimi Raikkonen

                      The moment the idea is admitted into society, that property is not as sacred as the laws of God, and that there is not a force of law and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence.' and that `Property is surely a right of mankind as real as liberty.'
                      - John Adams

                      http://www.usdebtclock.org/

                      Comment

                      • #86
                        wildhawker
                        I need a LIFE!!
                        • Nov 2008
                        • 14150

                        Originally posted by bwiese
                        And lack of a ruling by DOJ has nothing to due with legality.
                        Exactly. Especially when you consider that the previous and current AG's will not issue legal opinions on firearms, materials, and devices at all.

                        -Brandon
                        Brandon Combs

                        I do not read private messages, and my inbox is usually full. If you need to reach me, please email me instead.

                        My comments are not the official position or a statement of any organization unless stated otherwise. My comments are not legal advice; if you want or need legal advice, hire a lawyer.

                        Comment

                        • #87
                          Quiet
                          retired Goon
                          • Mar 2007
                          • 30241

                          FWIW...
                          From talking to the Riverside County DA Investigator assigned to my work, the Riverside County DA's Office will prosecute possession of tannerite as a destructive device.


                          Penal Code 18720
                          Every person who possesses any substance, material, or any combination of substances or materials, with the intent to make any destructive device or any explosive without first obtaining a valid permit to make that destructive device or explosive, is guilty of a felony, and is punishable by imprisonment pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170 for two, three, or four years.
                          sigpic

                          "If someone has a gun and is trying to kill you, it would be reasonable to shoot back with your own gun." - Dalai Lama (Seattle Times, 05-15-2001).

                          Comment

                          • #88
                            LBDamned
                            I need a LIFE!!
                            • Feb 2011
                            • 19040

                            Originally posted by Quiet
                            FWIW...
                            From talking to the Riverside County DA Investigator assigned to my work, the Riverside County DA's Office will prosecute possession of tannerite as a destructive device.


                            Penal Code 18720
                            Every person who possesses any substance, material, or any combination of substances or materials, with the intent to make any destructive device or any explosive without first obtaining a valid permit to make that destructive device or explosive, is guilty of a felony, and is punishable by imprisonment pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170 for two, three, or four years.
                            the issue is whether or not Tannerite meets those definitions... I'm not stating an opinion - but your post is not a revelation, but in fact what the controversy is over.
                            "Kamala is a radical leftist lunatic" ~ Donald J. Trump

                            Comment

                            • #89
                              LBDamned
                              I need a LIFE!!
                              • Feb 2011
                              • 19040

                              Originally posted by bwiese
                              Hey, sonny, I was the one that brought this up.

                              The individual is a good Calgunner that has done much for the movement.
                              The drama was in SoCal, and took $15+K of lawyering to get felony down to misdemeanor with 18 month firearms prohibition. And that option is not even really clearly presented in the law.

                              [The individual was in fact quite afraid of missing a possible OLL 'time window' back in 2006 in case that closed before his 18mos was up.]

                              The law is pretty clear, despite your apparent failure to read. And lack of a ruling by DOJ has nothing to due with legality.
                              just curious... why is this the "one" example always referenced?...

                              I'm not a proponent of the use (in CA)... but I do understand opposition's flak since there isn't more evidence of convictions... I've seen/read this same example in almost every Tannerite thread... but other than this reference there has only been loose mention of others (never specifics or even remote details)...

                              Again, I'm not suggesting Tannerite is legal, should be legal or will be legal in CA... I'm simply expressing a seemingly obvious concern that some imply factual examples, but only ever reference one.
                              Last edited by LBDamned; 06-02-2012, 3:13 AM.
                              "Kamala is a radical leftist lunatic" ~ Donald J. Trump

                              Comment

                              • #90
                                760knox
                                Senior Member
                                • Dec 2010
                                • 1394

                                Originally posted by tyrist
                                California state laws are far more restrictive than federal laws.
                                Tell that to all of the pot smokers....
                                YouTube:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSS...ms0ymGBQt_Jtdw

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1