Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NFA MP5 for $60k in Reno
Collapse
X
-
-
Not all republicans are pro 2A and certainly even less are true PotG. But there are definitely more pro 2A republicans than there are 2A democrats so pick you political party poison as you see fit.
Our Republican controlled ATF and DOJ is actively fighting to make pistol braces illegal and enforce SBR rules and when they had the chance to pass the Hearing Protection Act they completely neutered it and instead of legalizing suppressors all they did was lower the price of the registration and paperwork to $0. So if that's the best we can get with Republican controlled government I think we are screwed when the other side takes over. I wish you were right but I don't see it happening. We are never getting these rights back.
I don't know that there was enough support in the senate to overcome a filibuster on the HEAR act. That was a real impediment, and not just because of RINOs.
That said, if we get SBRs and suppressors into common usage via a $0 tax this sets us up for a common usage SCOTUS case that can finally expose the 1934 NFA as the unconstitutional infringement that it really is.
This is a long-term perpetual war that is not going to be won with one president or one court decision. Never forget that most people (republican or democrat) are not invested in the 2A like we are. Even less of them are true People of the Gun.
We win this by getting things into common usage. That helps us court-wise and election wise, and by the reality that once these things exist and are widely distributed there s no law or policy that is going to magically make them go away.
Comment
-
Do we really want anyone to buy guns in the USA or just covered citizens?Comment
-
Wonder how many HERE have $60K to spend like that....A few??
I do know that there are some very wealthy individuals on the site living in multimillion dollar near the ocean homes.Comment
-
I personally feel like that we ALL have an inherent natural right to keep and bear arms but only US citizens should have the the legal right to do so within the USA. People who want to exercise that right need to be citizens IMO. There is inherent danger to firearms and even more inherent danger to allowing foreigners to possess them.
👍 2Comment
-
Absolutely agree
I personally feel like that we ALL have an inherent natural right to keep and bear arms but only US citizens should have the the legal right to do so within the USA. People who want to exercise that right need to be citizens IMO. There is inherent danger to firearms and even more inherent danger to allowing foreigners to possess them.Comment
-
That is why you move to Nevada. If your fortunate your pulling in a California income and paying lower Nevada expenses, and no state income tax. Even with higher gas, your still not driving much compared to California. Your keeping alot of your earnings.
Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,864,200
Posts: 25,116,408
Members: 355,945
Active Members: 4,578
Welcome to our newest member, glocksource.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 7196 users online. 135 members and 7061 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 10:39 PM on 02-14-2026.

Comment