any changes in the 10rd limit law?

[DirtyLaundry]

I am still very excited to hear what his plan is...

I'd bet money it has him setting up a armored security car company or contracting with an existing company to sell magazine in state via the armored security exemption.

Based on the law this is the only legal way to sell high capacity magazines to civilians in state.

[TheThousands]

I'd bet money it has him setting up a armored security car company or contracting with an existing company to sell magazine in state via the armored security exemption.

Based on the law this is the only legal way to sell high capacity magazines to civilians in state.

But we would still have to abide by the assault weapons ban right? So I would need a featureless AR to use the legally acquired 30 rounders.

Still would be awesome

[repubconserv]

I'd bet money it has him setting up a armored security car company or contracting with an existing company to sell magazine in state via the armored security exemption.

Based on the law this is the only legal way to sell high capacity magazines to civilians in state.

I doubt it. Gene has said this about the topic

The reason no one has bought or started an armored car company is that there is a better way to invalidate the law. We've already laid the groundwork for that other way.

-Gene

Bill said this in the same thread

Robert,

The armored car exemption is useful but not equipped that well for continuing volume sales in a hostile political environment.

Amongst the issues:
-requires real armored cars;
-requires being in the armored car biz already with variety of legit customers and ongoing business & revenue flow.
-relevant employee(s) need the right certification
-rational attempt to make money in that biz and not just be an
exploit for magazines
-the exemption involved could be mooted in one legislative session
-requires major effort in setting up such a business - instead of
doing gunrights

The path we are getting to:
-is irrelevant to CA laws if path is followed
-can't be voided by legislature
-far lower initial setup cost, somewhat borne by increased mag costs
-eventual substantial 'paper backing' like we had on OLLs

from this thread

[DirtyLaundry]

But we would still have to abide by the assault weapons ban right? So I would need a featureless AR to use the legally acquired 30 rounders.

Still would be awesome

Yes, you' still have to comply with all applicable laws. The AW laws are independent of the magazine importation/manufacture/sale law.

I doubt it. Gene has said this about the topic

Bill said this in the same thread

from this thread

Thanks for the link. Interesting, I wonder what they have cooked up?
From what I've read of the law it doesn't leave much latitude for sale outside the armored security company or LEO exemptions. I'll take another look at the law.

[repubconserv]

Yes, you' still have to comply with all applicable laws. The AW laws are independent of the magazine importation/manufacture/sale law.



Thanks for the link. Interesting, I wonder what they have cooked up?
From what I've read of the law it doesn't leave much latitude for sale outside the armored security company or LEO exemptions. I'll take another look at the law.

If you find something that would be amazing. I have read and re-read that law so many times trying to figure out what the heck they could possibly do and I cant find anything (maybe I'm just stupid... that is totally possible).

I am guessing it is something outside of that particular law. Or some law when taken in conjunction with that law will make another, better work around.

[Fishslayer]

any law suits currently going on for removing the ban on "high cap" mags? seems to be a really pointless law since 10 rounds can easily do as much damage as 10+ rounds...by reloading...

You think our gun laws have anything to do with public safety.

You're new here. You have much to learn.