Just started watching this, its about the Remington 700 and all the controversy about the trigger.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remington Under Fire on Netflix
Collapse
X
-
I thought it was done pretty well. It's hard to argue with the creator of the 700. Remington has rebuttal videos. But there counter argument is weak at best. I don't think a 95 year old man has much to prove by talking honestly about hit rifle and the defects it had.
Most in the gun community hate the video, cause it sheds a bad light on one of the cornerstone American gun manufacturers. Personally I dont care what the company is, if they are putting out a defective product it should be called out.Last edited by pacifico23; 03-24-2012, 7:49 AM.Comment
-
Watching it. Plays like a hit piece so far. I dont watch TV, maybe this is just what TV journalism looks like these days.Comment
-
-
Originally posted by TeddyBallgamemaybe I'm wrong, but, if a $50.00 investment can help me a bit, i'll just have to go a day without the hookers and blow to cover it
Originally posted by ir0nclash86I would wipe it off for the simple fact of not wanting to get sprayed in the face with it during the first few rounds.Originally posted by Ride MadoneIt does not matter.An AR is the very best and safest weapon to use for home defence.Comment
-

Im watching it right now, pretty good video.Comment
-
I have seen the program and not knowing all the facts, it just seems like a case where the bean counters figured it is cheaper to settle a few law suites than redesign and suffer the ramifications of how wide spread the replacement cost of new and old alike may cost them after additional lawsuits, litigation, etc. Just a knee jerk response.Comment
-
Wow, I just watched the Remington response video and that certainly tells a different story.Comment
-
If this were a real problem, then we'd know about it. There are more than enough 700s out there in the hands of people who pull them out once a year for deer season to showcase any design flaw.
If you mess with the internals of a gun, you're going to create problems. I'd bet dollars to donuts that these rifles all had triggers that were "improved" by someone who knew little of what they were doing.For Sale: Off Roster Handgun Moving Sale
For Sale: Off Roster CZ, Browning, PTR 91 Moving Sale
Originally posted by KWalkerMeh why bring logic into this, that makes too much sense... besides when you have bested a fool, you have accomplished nothing and he is a fool.Comment
-
must look it upComment
-
Hahah! My dad called me once, obviously worked up after watching this piece and insisted that I get rid of my brand new 700 rifle. I would bet that most non gun people would feel the same after watching this, and much fewer would bother to watch the Remington response to this. If you believe what the big R says, not a single one of the rifles sent to them could be made to malfunction, and were X-Rayed as they came to check for sear engagement.
I'm sure the reason behind guns that have actually gone off by themselves is the same as why everybody hates the new X-Mark/Pro and loves the original 700 trigger - you can tune the old trigger, including reducing sear engagement which if done wrong will eventually lead to the gun not staying cocked, or the striker falling off of the sear at the slightest provocation.
I think it has to do with people tinkering with the trigger. The new X-Mark/Pro has all of its setscrews glued to dissuade this practice.Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,868,477
Posts: 25,171,077
Members: 357,642
Active Members: 5,354
Welcome to our newest member, Lvnfreenez_62.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 12173 users online. 130 members and 12043 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 10:39 PM on 02-14-2026.

Comment