I've attached a thread from a forum pretty much dedicated to the "handrifles" of which I have about 20 - it's a pretty contentious issue to the point the moderator posted a sticky.
If a firearm is manufactured as a rifle it is illegal to convert that firearm from a rifle to a handgun. The ease with which that can be accomplished is not a factor. If you purchased your Encore as a rifle it is illegal to mount a less than 16" bbl on that frame even when configured with a handgun stock.
The often cited Supreme Court case won by T/C did not address this issue, it addressed the subject of manufacturing and the legality of a kit offered for sale by T/C in which one of the items that could be assembled was a short barreled rifle. Since other legal configurations could be made T/C prevailed.
ATF, at the time, took the position of conversion to an extreme and it may well be their current position. Their position was that if you purchase an Encore handgun frame and subsequently mount a rifle barrel and rifle stock you can not legally convert it back to handgun status - once it's a rifle it must remain a rifle. Again, I do not know if that is their current position.
But if your Encore frame left the factory as a rifle it can not be configured as a handgun. Since Encore rifles were sold in CA for many years before the hangun was allowed in, I'd suspect there are alot of rifle frames with handgun barrels on them. I've not heard of ATF or DOJ going after someone on this alone, but if there were another reason for them to have an interest in someone I suppose they'd toss this charge in also given the opportunity.
And yes, the correct approach would be to sell it as a rifle. I think if you walked into a gun store and sold it as a handgun with a handgun barrel on it you could (again, in theory) be documenting your own violation of federal law. You could sell it frame only as a rifle.
If a firearm is manufactured as a rifle it is illegal to convert that firearm from a rifle to a handgun. The ease with which that can be accomplished is not a factor. If you purchased your Encore as a rifle it is illegal to mount a less than 16" bbl on that frame even when configured with a handgun stock.
The often cited Supreme Court case won by T/C did not address this issue, it addressed the subject of manufacturing and the legality of a kit offered for sale by T/C in which one of the items that could be assembled was a short barreled rifle. Since other legal configurations could be made T/C prevailed.
ATF, at the time, took the position of conversion to an extreme and it may well be their current position. Their position was that if you purchase an Encore handgun frame and subsequently mount a rifle barrel and rifle stock you can not legally convert it back to handgun status - once it's a rifle it must remain a rifle. Again, I do not know if that is their current position.
But if your Encore frame left the factory as a rifle it can not be configured as a handgun. Since Encore rifles were sold in CA for many years before the hangun was allowed in, I'd suspect there are alot of rifle frames with handgun barrels on them. I've not heard of ATF or DOJ going after someone on this alone, but if there were another reason for them to have an interest in someone I suppose they'd toss this charge in also given the opportunity.
And yes, the correct approach would be to sell it as a rifle. I think if you walked into a gun store and sold it as a handgun with a handgun barrel on it you could (again, in theory) be documenting your own violation of federal law. You could sell it frame only as a rifle.


Comment