Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

$54 LACS Weapon seizure fee

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • pogo
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2005
    • 588

    $54 LACS Weapon seizure fee

    This is news to me, and may spell a trend with departments in California. Hopefully this will never effect anyone here, but all it takes is a vindictive ex who wants to cause you trouble, and a substantial collection X 54 could really add up.


    -------------------------------------------------------


    County to charge $54 fee when returning seized guns

    By Alison Shackelford Hewitt
    Copley News Service

    The Sheriff's Department gained approval from the county Board of Supervisors on Tuesday to begin charging $54 to people who want to reclaim seized guns.

    A new state law allows the fee to be collected so that law enforcement agencies can recoup the costs of gun seizure and storage. With about 500 guns annually in Los Angeles County eligible to be returned to their owners, the program could bring $27,000 a year.

    Most confiscated guns are not eligible for return, having been taken from people who stole them or used them in a crime. Those guns are held as evidence and then usually destroyed, said Glen Dragovich of the Sheriff's Department.

    But some guns are seized temporarily, such as when the owner is arrested for domestic violence. Other guns are simply found and stored until the owners come forward. Still others are taken as part of search warrants, or from the mentally impaired, and are ordered to be returned by a judge.

    "Once we verify ownership and ensure that it's OK to return it, we will charge the fee," Dragovich explained. "It's like an impound fee for recovering your car."

    If a stolen gun is confiscated and can be returned to the real owner, however, the original owner will not have to pay, he said.
    Last edited by pogo; 11-23-2005, 11:44 PM.
  • #2
    Gnote
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2005
    • 876

    That is such a crock. I mean $27k may sound like a lot but if you look at the overall annual budget for the Sheriff's Department, it probably doesn't amount to much. I guess every little bit helps.

    Comment

    • #3
      artherd
      Calguns Addict
      • Oct 2005
      • 5038

      Extortion WHAT?! Deprived of property WHAT?!
      - Ben Cannon.
      Chairman, CEO -
      CoFounder - Postings are my own, and are not formal positions of any other entity, or legal advice.

      Comment

      • #4
        stealthmode
        Member
        • Oct 2005
        • 242

        crock is an understatement

        Comment

        • #5
          jnojr
          Calguns Addict
          • Oct 2005
          • 8074

          Originally posted by pogo
          -------------------------------------------------------


          County to charge $54 fee when returning seized guns

          By Alison Shackelford Hewitt
          Copley News Service

          The Sheriff's Department gained approval from the county Board of Supervisors on Tuesday to begin charging $54 to people who want to reclaim seized guns.

          A new state law allows the fee to be collected so that law enforcement agencies can recoup the costs of gun seizure and storage. With about 500 guns annually in Los Angeles County eligible to be returned to their owners, the program could bring $27,000 a year.
          Sheriffs Departments could make a lot more by going shall-issue on CCWs...


          San Diego FFLs | San Diego ranges
          I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it. --Thomas Jefferson
          ** I had my San Diego County CCW... you can, too!

          Comment

          • #6
            esskay
            Senior Member
            • Oct 2005
            • 2304

            Originally posted by pogo
            "Once we verify ownership and ensure that it's OK to return it..." Dragovich explained.
            How do they go about "Verifying Ownership" if official agencies are not supposed to be retaining information about firearms transfers? What if it was a C&R longgun FTF transfer, which has no paperwork requirement? What if it was a gun you owned for 30 years, prior to transfer paperwork? Oy vey.

            This reminds me... I think this is the reason that I started keeping record of all the DROS #s for my firearms transfers. Just in case I get dragged through this BS.
            WTS: Ewbank AKM & NDS-4 AK receivers, Custom Chief AJ Ruger Mini-14

            WTS: Oakley SI Shoes

            WTS KAC rail panels

            WTS: MGI Hydra Modular AR Lower

            Comment

            • #7
              delloro
              Senior Member
              • Oct 2005
              • 549

              then sue the ex for the money.

              this is not surprising at all in our post-Prop 13 world.
              .
              click HERE to see scantily-clad women with guns

              Comment

              • #8
                CaliTheKid
                Senior Member
                • Oct 2005
                • 546

                yep

                Originally posted by jnojr
                Sheriffs Departments could make a lot more by going shall-issue on CCWs...
                x1. I agree 100%.

                Comment

                • #9
                  delloro
                  Senior Member
                  • Oct 2005
                  • 549

                  no no no, the bajillions that would be spent to staunch the rivers of blood that would inexorably follow would far outweigh any benefit, after all, look at what happened everywhere else CCWs are granted as a matter of right....
                  .
                  click HERE to see scantily-clad women with guns

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  UA-8071174-1