Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Weapon permanently inoperable ???

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #16
    MudCamper
    Veteran Member
    • Mar 2007
    • 4595

    Originally posted by bdsmchs
    ATF says that 3 torch cuts that each remove a minimum of 1/4" material is sufficient to permanently de-mill any receiver.
    Originally posted by bdsmchs
    That would definitely still be considered a firearm according to the BATFE.

    3 torch cuts, each removing AT LEAST 1/4" of material.
    Originally posted by Cokebottle
    ATF says torch with missing material. Sawcut wouldn't do the job unless maybe it's a dado blade.

    Easily... and it would probably work just fine.
    But the OP's question is not in relation to ATF rules. It's for purposes of California assault weapons law.

    Comment

    • #17
      EBR Works
      Vendor/Retailer
      • Dec 2007
      • 10492

      Originally posted by 45DAVID1
      Looks like road rash
      or rug rash..


      Check out our e-commerce site here:

      www.ebrworks.com

      Serving you from Prescott, AZ

      Comment

      • #18
        kermit315
        Calguns Addict
        • Sep 2007
        • 5928

        Originally posted by Caiman
        The OP didn't specify what he was making inopertable. It could be a pistol for that matter or a non-seperating rifle. Making inopertable is not the same as destoying. One could take an AW whatever and weld everything closed, open or whatever was needed so that the parts don't move, can't fire, plainly just not function and still keep the receiver intact. That would make it inopertable in California's eyes. Mudcamper got it right. This is a CA section.

        If on the other hand you were to destroy the receiver than BDSMCHS is correct as well as yourself as you each are quoting BATFE guildlines.
        Doesnt matter, as the serialized part is the firearm, and on almost all guns, thats the reciever. So, to make the firearm inoperable, you almost always have to do something to the reciever. I dont even think plugging it would work, because that is reversible.

        Comment

        • #19
          tuolumnejim
          I need a LIFE!!
          • Jun 2008
          • 11100

          Originally posted by HKROB
          What does render the weapon permanently inoperable mean ??


          12285(b)(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), no assault weapon possessed pursuant to this section may be sold or transferred on or after January 1, 1990, to anyone within this state other than to a licensed gun dealer, as defined in subdivision (c) of Section 12290, or as provided in Section 12288. Any person who (A) obtains title to an assault weapon registered under this section or that was possessed pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (f) of Section 12280 by bequest or intestate succession, or (B) lawfully possessed a firearm subsequently declared to be an assault weapon pursuant to Section 12276.5, or subsequently defined as an assault weapon pursuant to Section 12276.1, shall, within 90 days, render the weapon permanently inoperable, sell the weapon to a licensed gun dealer, obtain a permit from the Department of Justice in the same manner as specified in Article 3 (commencing with Section 12230) of Chapter 2, or remove the weapon from this state. A person who lawfully possessed a firearm that was subsequently declared to be an assault weapon pursuant to Section 12276.5 may alternatively register the firearm within 90 days of the declaration issued pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 12276.5.
          Means it was made by Raven.
          In a state where corruption abounds, laws must be very numerous.
          Publius Cornelius Scipio

          Tyranny is defined as that which is legal for the government but illegal for the citizenry.
          ― Thomas Jefferson

          Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.
          John Adams

          Comment

          • #20
            Mickey D
            Veteran Member
            • Jun 2007
            • 3502

            Originally posted by Vin496
            What's up with that dude's leg?
            He ripped his panty hose.
            ***Honesty is the Foundation of One's Character***

            *** In comparing the virtues of various calibers, using hollow point ammo: it is absolutely undeniable that, while a 9 mm or .40 S&W may or may not expand, a .45 will never shrink. ***

            ***Mature Up***

            Comment

            • #21
              bohoki
              I need a LIFE!!
              • Jan 2006
              • 20825

              Originally posted by bdsmchs
              That would definitely still be considered a firearm according to the BATFE.

              3 torch cuts, each removing AT LEAST 1/4" of material.

              but which piece would be the firearm if you sold them to 2 different people

              or did i just sell 2 firearms?

              Comment

              • #22
                CHS
                Moderator Emeritus
                CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                • Jan 2008
                • 11338

                Originally posted by bohoki
                but which piece would be the firearm if you sold them to 2 different people
                The part with the serial number still attached.

                If you cut the serial number, then you have just unlawfully obliterated a serial number. A felony in this state and federally, if I remember correctly.

                If you're serious about destroying a receiver, Do the 3rd cut on the serial number, so that the 1st and 2nd cuts don't end up making you a criminal by obliterating part of the serial number. That way, if the 3rd cut obliterates the serial number, you're covered because it no longer matters as the receiver has been lawfully destroyed.
                Please read the Calguns Wiki
                Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes...Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.
                --Cesare, Marquis of Beccaria, "On Crimes and Punishment"

                Comment

                • #23
                  bohoki
                  I need a LIFE!!
                  • Jan 2006
                  • 20825

                  there is the funny case of the nylon 66 i had one and it worked just fine without the reciever

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  UA-8071174-1