Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

FN 5.7 or Ruger 5.7?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #16
    Quiet
    retired Goon
    • Mar 2007
    • 30242

    Originally posted by Glock23SD
    PSA 5.7 is not legal in CA. I would have jumped on it.
    The standard PSA 5.7 Rock is a CA legal off-Roster pistol.
    ^Because it is a CA legal off-Roster handgun, a CA FFL dealer can only legally transfer if via an exemption.
    ~The standard magazines for it are considered large capacity magazines, so unless exempt, the magazines need to be permanently altered to 10 rounds prior to being imported to CA.

    PSA does offer a threaded barrel variant of their 5.7 Rock, which is a CA illegal (assault weapon) off-Roster pistol.
    Last edited by Quiet; 11-20-2022, 5:50 PM.
    sigpic

    "If someone has a gun and is trying to kill you, it would be reasonable to shoot back with your own gun." - Dalai Lama (Seattle Times, 05-15-2001).

    Comment

    • #17
      Burbur
      Senior Member
      • Sep 2010
      • 1258

      $1250 is a decent price on a Ruger 57. I'd get that one, becuase obtaining an FN is easier and normally more expensive.

      Comment

      • #18
        Glock23SD
        Junior Member
        • Nov 2022
        • 23

        Originally posted by Burbur
        $1250 is a decent price on a Ruger 57. I'd get that one, becuase obtaining an FN is easier and normally more expensive.
        Thanks for the positive feedback, just what i needed. I just went in and purchased it but was kinda thinking if I made a bad decision or not. Now seeing your post, makes me feel much better. Waiting on the background check to clear. I will post some pics and my opinion of this firearm soon.

        Comment

        • #19
          Burbur
          Senior Member
          • Sep 2010
          • 1258

          Originally posted by Glock23SD
          Thanks for the positive feedback, just what i needed. I just went in and purchased it but was kinda thinking if I made a bad decision or not. Now seeing your post, makes me feel much better. Waiting on the background check to clear. I will post some pics and my opinion of this firearm soon.
          If you ever need someone to tell you to "just buy it" I'm always available.

          Comment

          • #20
            GW
            I need a LIFE!!
            • May 2004
            • 16078

            I have the Ruger 57 and think its a great gun. A lot of (expensive) fun to shoot and with 500+ rounds through it I've had zero issues with 27 and 49 gr ammo.
            sigpicNRA Benefactor Member

            Comment

            • #21
              Grumpyoldretiredcop
              Calguns Addict
              • Sep 2008
              • 6437

              I've shot the FN offering. Nice, accurate pistol with a weird safety. Passed it up for the Ruger 57. More conventional layout, very fun to shoot, accurate and I've not had any problems with any of the FN or American Eagle loadings.
              I'm retired. That's right, retired. I don't want to hear about the cop who stopped you today or how you didn't think you should get a ticket. That just makes me grumpy!

              Comment

              • #22
                Glock23SD
                Junior Member
                • Nov 2022
                • 23

                proud owner of a ruger 57! came with 2 (20rd) mags!
                i wasnt expecting the 5.7x28 ammo to be this tiny tho!

                Last edited by Glock23SD; 12-02-2022, 6:47 PM.

                Comment

                • #23
                  32spoke
                  Member
                  • Jan 2019
                  • 368

                  Originally posted by Grumpyoldretiredcop
                  I've shot the FN offering. Nice, accurate pistol with a weird safety. Passed it up for the Ruger 57. More conventional layout, very fun to shoot, accurate and I've not had any problems with any of the FN or American Eagle loadings.

                  Thank you for your observation on the ammo. I picked up 2k of the federal and 1k of the FN SS197

                  Comment

                  • #24
                    k1dude
                    I need a LIFE!!
                    • May 2009
                    • 15573

                    I would consider the PSA 5.7 or the new FN 5.7 MRD. The old FN 5.7 I wouldn't consider.
                    "Show me a young conservative and I'll show you a man without a heart. Show me an old liberal and I'll show you a man without a brain." - Sir Winston Churchill

                    "I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue!" - Senator Barry Goldwater

                    Comment

                    • #25
                      nitroxdiver
                      Calguns Addict
                      • Aug 2009
                      • 6979

                      VIDEO LINK HERE: https://youtu.be/YQCkldaodgY ***Trial report + documents at the end of article***Many have said that the NATO PDW trials were a way for arming rear echelon Western-European troops in defense of Russian paratrooper invasions. Today we are here to challenge current ideas on the NATO PDW trials… ideas that were based on rumors passed down. We obtained the actual NATO Army Armaments Group (NAAG) trial report from 2002, and our friend, fellow youtuber Oxide helped us run tests on so

                      Comment

                      • #26
                        32spoke
                        Member
                        • Jan 2019
                        • 368

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        UA-8071174-1