Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

What is rationale for limitations on threaded barrels?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • lanzador49
    Member
    • Jun 2016
    • 167

    What is rationale for limitations on threaded barrels?

    My understanding is that a threaded barrel on an semi-automatic pistol with a detachable magazine turns the gun into an illegal assault weapon the possession of which is treated as a felony under PC 30515(a)(4)(A)

    I know that there is typically no rhyme or reason when it comes to California gun laws, and that laws often arise out of compromise language that results in widespread confusion and crippling ambiguity...but if anyone can shed some light: what is the concern about a threaded barrel on a semi-automatic handgun with a detachable magazine? Why is a "flash suppressor" or "silencer" such a concern?

    This is a theoretical question - just trying to understand...

    Thanks to all.
  • #2
    lastinline
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2014
    • 2364

    There is no rationale. This is California; that says everything you need to know.

    Comment

    • #3
      bugsy714
      Senior Member
      • Mar 2011
      • 2418

      Presumably that they feel a threaded barrel facilitates the attachment of a silencer


      Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
      dictated but not read

      Voice typing will butcher whatever I was trying to say

      Comment

      • #4
        G-forceJunkie
        Calguns Addict
        • Jul 2010
        • 6340

        Can't put those evil silencers and flash hiders on

        Comment

        • #5
          SkyHawk
          I need a LIFE!!
          • Sep 2012
          • 23518

          The same rationale that bans nunchucks and throwing stars: someone watched too many Steven Seagal movies and got scured that ninjas and other assassins would be wildin in the streets of CA
          Click here for my iTrader Feedback thread: https://www.calguns.net/forum/market...r-feedback-100

          Comment

          • #6
            lanzador49
            Member
            • Jun 2016
            • 167

            Originally posted by lastinline
            There is no rationale. This is California; that says everything you need to know.
            That pretty much says it all!

            So, a "silence" or "flash suppressor" makes the firearm more dangerous or lethal?

            Maybe it's this: if people don't hear a gunshot, they won't disperse and a shooter can cause more damage if people remain concentrated instead of running away at the sound of a gunshot?? i.e., the sound alerts people to imminent danger, and if the sound is suppressed, they become easy targets? That's really all I can think of.

            (And about the nunchucks...how is anybody supposed to get skills? I learned long ago from Napoleon that girls only want boyfriends that have great skills...)
            Last edited by lanzador49; 06-06-2022, 10:24 PM.

            Comment

            • #7
              bohoki
              I need a LIFE!!
              • Jan 2006
              • 20816

              if you want it you can't have it

              Comment

              • #8
                lanzador49
                Member
                • Jun 2016
                • 167

                Originally posted by bohoki
                if you want it you can't have it
                Ahhhh, California.

                You're on to me...I only want things I can't have. Just ask my 4th, 5th, and 6th wives...!

                Comment

                • #9
                  M76
                  Calguns Addict
                  • Apr 2014
                  • 5954

                  To suppress our inalienable rights
                  sigpic
                  Originally posted by dunndeal
                  Stop digging.
                  Originally posted by BrassCase
                  I only buy fireworks from Three Finger Willie over at One Eyed Jack's Fireworks.
                  iTrader

                  https://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/....php?t=1884858

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    johncage
                    Banned
                    • Dec 2018
                    • 993

                    Originally posted by lanzador49
                    That pretty much says it all!

                    So, a "silence" or "flash suppressor" makes the firearm more dangerous or lethal?

                    Maybe it's this: if people don't hear a gunshot, they won't disperse and a shooter can cause more damage if people remain concentrated instead of running away at the sound of a gunshot?? i.e., the sound alerts people to imminent danger, and if the sound is suppressed, they become easy targets? That's really all I can think of.

                    (And about the nunchucks...how is anybody supposed to get skills? I learned long ago from Napoleon that girls only want boyfriends that have great skills...)
                    that is one of their rationales because most politicians are braindead and ignorant, they believe silencers act exactly like this scene:

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      RickD427
                      CGN/CGSSA Contributor - Lifetime
                      CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                      • Jan 2007
                      • 9266

                      Originally posted by lanzador49
                      My understanding is that a threaded barrel on an semi-automatic pistol with a detachable magazine turns the gun into an illegal assault weapon the possession of which is treated as a felony under PC 30515(a)(4)(A)

                      I know that there is typically no rhyme or reason when it comes to California gun laws, and that laws often arise out of compromise language that results in widespread confusion and crippling ambiguity...but if anyone can shed some light: what is the concern about a threaded barrel on a semi-automatic handgun with a detachable magazine? Why is a "flash suppressor" or "silencer" such a concern?

                      This is a theoretical question - just trying to understand...

                      Thanks to all.
                      There is nothing in Penal Code section 30515 that makes possession of an Assault Weapon a felony.

                      All that Penal Code section 30515 does is to define an "Evil by Feature" Assault Weapon. It contains no penal provisions. You can't fang anybody for violating PC 30515.

                      The penal provisions governing Assault Weapons are Penal Code sections 30600 for one who "manufactures or causes to be manufactured, distributes, transports, or imports into the state, keeps for sale, or offers or exposes for sale, or who gives or lends any assault weapon" and section 30605 for one who simply possesses an unregistered Assault Weapon.

                      Both PC 30600 and 30605 are felonies, but 30605 carries a lessor penalty and can be alternatively charged as a misdemeanor.

                      There really isn't any clearly explained rationale for the ban on threaded barrels. It's often a mistake to assume that rationality exists in the statutes. But in looking at the context of the statute, it appears to have been included in order to prevent the post-purchase installation if flash hiders and suppressors.
                      If you build a man a fire, you'll keep him warm for the evening. If you set a man on fire, you'll keep him warm for the rest of his life.

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        Capybara
                        CGSSA Coordinator
                        CGN Contributor
                        • Feb 2012
                        • 15367

                        You can never invoke logic or rationale in California gun laws, they are designed to harass and humilate law abiding citizens, nothing more. Same lack of logic as banning grenade launchers on, for instance, a Yugo SKS. Idiotic, like every gun law in this state. Grenades are illegal here, but the morons in Sacramento think if you have a surplus rifle from half a century ago, you're going to pop down to the local grenade emporium and wreak havoc on society.

                        If silencers are illegal in California, why would they care? Flash hiders aren't illegal here, they are only illegal in certain rifle configurations. They double down on the stupidity and paranoia, it's as if most of these supposedly highly educated lawyers and legislators in Sacramento received their firearms and weapons knowledge solely from Chuck Norris and Steven Seagal movies, instead of taking half an hour and learning about the realities of firearms and accessories. Not that it matters, even if they knew anything about firearms, they would still be pushing hard for civilian disarmament every single minute of every day.
                        NRA Certified Metallic Cartridge Reloading Instructor, Shotgun Instructor and Range Safety Officer

                        sigpic

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          Oceanbob
                          I need a LIFE!!
                          • Jun 2010
                          • 12720

                          Funny. In New Zealand where one of my daughterS lives, you can buy a suppressors over the counter for as little as $40 bucks.
                          Gun store people even sell most of their hunting rifles with a surpressor and not having one is considered RUDE AND TOO MUCH NOISE.

                          None are licensed or serial numbered and is as easy as buying a typical cleaning kit.



                          May the Bridges I burn light the way.

                          Life Is Not About Waiting For The Storm To Pass - Its About Learning To Dance In The Rain.

                          Fewer people are killed with all rifles each year (323 in 2011) than with shotguns (356), hammers and clubs (496), and hands and feet (728).

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            SkyHawk
                            I need a LIFE!!
                            • Sep 2012
                            • 23518

                            Originally posted by RickD427
                            But in looking at the context of the statute, it appears to have been included in order to prevent the post-purchase installation if flash hiders and suppressors.
                            Because installing a threaded barrel is so hard. It literally adds 20 seconds to the process...

                            Apparently they thought that would slow down the criminal ninja assassins who are otherwise willing to break any law required shoot someone with a silenced pistol
                            Click here for my iTrader Feedback thread: https://www.calguns.net/forum/market...r-feedback-100

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              CAL.BAR
                              CGSSA OC Chapter Leader
                              • Nov 2007
                              • 5632

                              Originally posted by bugsy714
                              Presumably that they feel a threaded barrel facilitates the attachment of a silencer


                              Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
                              Well, you can't very well attach a silencer WITHOUT threads ( or other specialized mounting attachments).

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1