Could get a ruling on the JT grip

[morrcarr67]

Feel free to move if in the wrong place.

I just saw this on FB. It looks like someone has been arrested in San Diego county and they are calling these AW.

[MountainLion]

Doesn't have to be about the JT grip. Could be about flash hider, or second fore grip, or collapsing stock. It could even be that they were maglocked and had a large capacity mag installed.

[ojisan]

Doesn't have to be about the JT grip. Could be about flash hider, or second fore grip, or collapsing stock. It could even be that they were maglocked and had a large capacity mag installed.

- We can only see one muzzle which has a brake.
- We see only one front grip, it is a angled type and legal under Fed and State law.
- I see telescoping stocks that are likely pinned in their almost longest position.
Why are they likely pinned to this length?
Because they don't collapse so the guy bought a long enough case for them to fit into.
- These appear to be Ca compliant featureless rifles which can legally use a 11+ round mag and don't need a mag lock.
- With Freedom Week on the records, possession of hi-caps is only a nuisance confiscation these days.
- The JT grip could come under scrutiny as the OP says.

If the guy was messing with children, he's up the creek and every charge possible will be made against him, including false ones.

[bugsy714]

Should be interesting to see being as how the DOJ conspicuously did not mention the JT featureless grip in the salt weapon shenanigans about that modified lower


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[sbo80]

I'll point out that "arrested for", in a press release, is not the same thing as "charges filed". So, remains to be seen how it shakes out.

[SkyHawk]

Doesn't have to be about the JT grip. Could be about flash hider, or second fore grip, or collapsing stock. It could even be that they were maglocked and had a large capacity mag installed.

But if I was a betting man, it is the JT grip. Those things are a bust.

[helpfuljack]

I'm guessing this had less to do with the actual configuration of the weapon and more to do with the opportunity to disarm a kiddie porn suspect, even if the grounds for confiscation were pretty dubious.

I'm guessing the firearm charges are the least of his worries at the moment.

[ysr_racer]

But if I was a betting man, it is the JT grip. Those things are a bust.

What's wrong with the jt grip?

[seaweedsoyboy]

I'm guessing this had less to do with the actual configuration of the weapon and more to do with the opportunity to disarm a kiddie porn suspect, even if the grounds for confiscation were pretty dubious.

I'm guessing the firearm charges are the least of his worries at the moment.

Have to assume that. Thousands of people, if not more, are using the JT grip as a compliance device on their featureless builds. If the charges are based on solely the grip, it would be pretty catastrophic if they are not dropped. Either way, I guess we'll find out. In the mean time... brb gotta go swap something out..

[OlderThanDirt]

What's wrong with the jt grip?

[morrcarr67]

My guess is that they will go over every aspect of these rifles. If no prohibited person in possession of an AW charges are added, it's good. If prohibited person in possession of an AW charges are added we'll have to wait to see what characteristics are in violation.

Sent from my BE2026 using Tapatalk

[Uncivil Engineer]

My guess is that they will go over every aspect of these rifles. If no prohibited person in possession of an AW charges are added, it's good. If prohibited person in possession of an AW charges are added we'll have to wait to see what characteristics are in violation.

Sent from my BE2026 using Tapatalk

It really doesn't matter. They are just going to use it as part of a charge stack to get him to accept a plea.

Unless it actually went to court, which almost never happens these days we will never know off it's legal or not.

Sent from my Pixel 4 XL using Tapatalk

[GunnEnvy]

I thought I read a thread somewhere that someone unregistered their AW and submitted pics of his featureless rifle with the JT grips and it was approved. Gotta dig and find it.

[Quiet]

But if I was a betting man, it is the JT grip. Those things are a bust.

What's wrong with the jt grip?

California Code of Regulations Title 11 Division 5 Chapter 39 Article 2 Section 5471

[SharedShots]

There won't be a ruling on the JT grip because there is no benefit to doing so.

10 people are speeding, 75mph in a 50 mph zone. 1 gets popped. 100 people slow down to 40 mph, 9 of them exit to renew their registration, 6 get on the phone to buy insurance, 2 dump their dump their open containers and there is a traffic jam for 6 miles.








.