Winning gun rights with words

[waveslayer]

A "loss" cause? You butchered the idiom along with your horrible arguments for guns. Cars: Need a license to drive. Highly regulated. No constitutional amendment protecting them. Soon they'll ban an entire class of them (ICE) Etc. Etc. I didn't miss anything. You're just over estimating the effectiveness of your "argument"...and butchering an idiom. You're a "loss" cause.

Ha ha ha another Tacticool internet ninja. Ha ha. Say what you want. And I'm sorry you feel like CA is going to allow suppressors, class III ownerships, SBR's, sliding stocks etc... enlighten me where the constitution is going to help with those items that are normal outside of CA and most other states buy dumb libtard places like NY, Hawaii, NJ etc....?

Sorry it's a loss cause. Maybe we'll win to get more handguns on a roaster! Wow. So face Palm to you and you false dreams that CA will ever become a state of actual free gun ownership. Prove me wrong, I welcome it

Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk

[ohsmily]

Ha ha ha another Tacticool internet ninja. Ha ha. Say what you want. And I'm sorry you feel like CA is going to allow suppressors, class III ownerships, SBR's, sliding stocks etc... enlighten me where the constitution is going to help with those items that are normal outside of CA and most other states buy dumb libtard places like NY, Hawaii, NJ etc....?

Sorry it's a loss cause. Maybe we'll win to get more handguns on a roaster! Wow. So face Palm to you and you false dreams that CA will ever become a state of actual free gun ownership. Prove me wrong, I welcome it

Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk

Digging yourself deeper. I maintain you're a "loss" cause. Hint. Look up the idiom. Read a book. Get a clue. Extra points for the "roaster". Your posts are becoming increasingly unintelligible/nonsensical.

[waveslayer]

Digging yourself deeper. I maintain you're a "loss" cause. Hint. Look up the idiom. Read a book. Get a clue. Extra points for the "roaster". Your posts are becoming increasingly unintelligible/nonsensical.

Again prove me wrong, seems you have taken your own bait, your post hasn't even responded... I'm open to an intelligible debate but seems hard for you.

And I curious on moving this thread along when I share an opinion regarding gun terms... seems you are wanting to have a mental circle jerk over debating with a liberal or anti gun emo kid...

You won't change their mind, but if you educate and use simple, because most can't think logically, so you have to put it in simple terms with everyday things that we all can agree on... don't have to like my analogy. My feels aren't hurt by a Cal Guns forum user... sadly this place has gotten more and more users that use this for a sounding board of, "what's the best BBQ, my kids don't listen what do I do, um my LMT isn't fitting on my AR10" it is pretty laughable honestly. Calguns should change their name to exclude gun. It's mostly off topic posts that don't really do anything to progress gun rights gun education or anything gun really. Occasionally an interesting thread pops up, but mostly it's for legal advice on what CA allows and I wish I can have this gun crowd.

For sake of the OP and thread I'll share my opinion just like you have. Welcome to a forum. You may ask why do you even visit the forum then, well my intent is to see if anyone can actually get good advice. But you know my experience, which you have already posted about, PM and maybe I'll share a resume to satisfy you. Again strong words, I'm not impressed. Guess I'll get some sleep now that my movie is over.

Eternals sucked guys if you were wondering. Maybe I'll start a new thread on Calguns about it. [emoji1787][emoji1787][emoji1787][emoji1787]

Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk

[Snoopy47]

So our gun rights were established by word (the Constitution) and kept by using guns (the Revolution).

[Fate]

Guns are bad
>Eff you

People should not own guns
>Eff you

Why do you need a gun?
>Eff you

Get the idea?

[ja308]

Guns are bad
>Eff you

People should not own guns
>Eff you

Why do you need a gun?
>Eff you

Get the idea?

Or how willing would you be to put a tasteful yard sign or window sticker, proclaiming firearms free, now and forever ?

[ja308]

They say :" We'd be better off if no one had guns ."
We say : You can never succeed with that, criminals will always get guns" (Flaw the implication here is that if you could succeed ,it would be a reasonable plan)

We should say: So, you want to institute a system where the weak and elderly are the mercy of the strong , the lone at the mercy of a gang . You want to give violent criminals a government guarantee that citizens are disarmed . Sorry that's unacceptable.
Better we should require every citizen to carry a gun.
Hat tip ,
John Ross

[1911RONIN]

This. Cutesie comebacks are for children.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[-hanko]

Actually it isn't. Guns are highly regulated and you're missing the metaphor , but to each their own. Here in CA it doesn't matter it's a loss cause. I have had several hard conversations with Senators and congressman here, we are doomed. We can win all we want on the federal level but lose on the state level...

It's been a lost cause for more than twenty years.

[waveslayer]

It's been a lost cause for more than twenty years.

I agree 100% no real turning back

Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk