Featureless AR Grip

[200Apples]

Survivor Systems' Option Zero featureless stock. The fin is moulded into the entire stock structure (which includes a spare magwell). LOP is adjusted with the use of spacers. The Option Zero stock (in this case, grey) includes a black pistol grip which mates perfectly to their stock.

If when in a free state, you may simply remove the Option Zero and slide on your old Magpul (or other) adjustable stock and use with this grip.

[Heckler&Coke]

Don't go feature-less pick up an AR Maglock.

[Donny1]

I like these but it won't work with certain stocks because your hand won't go in between, and also you need an extended safety.

But no fin, I hate the fin.

https://resurgentarms.com/ra-featureless-rifle-grip/

[M1NM]

DOJ basically says if the manufacturer calls it a brake it's a brake. They don't have a design spec.

[Garbcollector]

Their's a member on this form that does grip wraps. I've bought a few from him he does good work but I can't remember his name

[ar15barrels]

Their's a member on this form that does grip wraps.
I've bought a few from him he does good work but I can't remember his name

His name is Oliver.
Good guy.

https://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/member.php?u=18113

https://www.fingrips.com

[xrMike]

There is no DOJ test.
There is no DOJ scrutiny.
There is no list of DOJ approved items.
DOJ does NOT give guidance on what is legal.
DOJ only states what is illegal per the laws.

The laws define what is illegal.
Everything that does not meet the definition of "illegal" is therefore legal.

Once again, right on.

[Sparrow Dynamics]

There is no DOJ test.
There is no DOJ scrutiny.
There is no list of DOJ approved items.
DOJ does NOT give guidance on what is legal.
DOJ only states what is illegal per the laws.

The laws define what is illegal.
Everything that does not meet the definition of "illegal" is therefore legal.

Randall wins for the best answer

[OlderThanDirt]

There is no DOJ test.
There is no DOJ scrutiny.
There is no list of DOJ approved items.
DOJ does NOT give guidance on what is legal.
DOJ only states what is illegal per the laws.

The laws define what is illegal.
Everything that does not meet the definition of "illegal" is therefore legal.

[SharedShots]

When you ask if something is legal most of the answers saying no are said just to see if you'll go along with the presumption of authority and not do it.

It's the "Mother May I?" syndrome.

It permeates so many of the questions asked which aren't asked to obtain information but to gain the approval of the groupthink and this is from people who claim to support individual rights. People get conditioned not to do most anything unless they run to ask if they can and they really don't care about the justification just so long as someone says yes they can or no they can't.

[bohoki]

the only one i know that was deemed a non pistol grip was the hammerhead

[SharedShots]

the only one i know that was deemed a non pistol grip was the hammerhead

Deemed by whom?

[ar15barrels]

But, but, but, what about the 58 DAs?
Isn’t that the FUD that the DOJ used to spew when asked if something was legal?

The law is still the law and it plainly spells out what's illegal.
The 58 DAs can charge on whatever they want as long as they can prove that the item being charged for is actually illegal.
That would mean that the DA would have to make the determination since the DOJ won't.

It would make for a a fun court case when 2 separate DA's in different counties determine that the same state law means different things.

[ar15barrels]

Deemed by whom?

[golfish]

I use a Sparrow Dynamics grip for my only featureless rifle.
.

Same here. I've tried the fin grips and didn't like em. Maybe I should have said that I disliked them more the Sparrow.